ABSTRACT- The aquatic and marshy angiospermic plants are most important component of aquatic and wetland ecosystem. They increase productivity of the aquatic ecosystem and help to maintain ecosystem balance. The importance of aquatic diversity for sustainable life support system is an acceptable fact throughout the world. The India has a rich variety of wetlands habitats. Tropical swamp forests once formed an important part of vegetation and extended all along the base of Himalayas from Assam to Jammu Kashmir. Wetlands are one of the most productive ecosystems and thus subjected to human greed which is yet another reason for their extinction is deforestation. Unfortunately these habitats have not been explored from ecological point of view. From this minor study, 59 species of wetland plants belonging to 37 families were recorded to be used. Out of total 59 species, dicot (47%) species and monocot (46%) less numbers are belong to Ptridophytes. In this study we were observed that many common aquatic macro and microflora of wetlands and marshlands of Yamuna nagar like as Aeschyno meneindica, Alternanthera philoxeroides, Alternanthera sessilis, Anagallis arvensis, Ceratophyllum demursum, Chrysopogon zizanioides, Commelina benghalensis, Cyperus alternifolius, Cyanotis axillaris, Cyperus rotundus, Dryopteris filix-mas, Dryopteris sieboldii, Echinochloa colona, Eichhornia crassipes, Hygrophila salicifolia, Ipomoea aquatica, Lemna minor, Ludwigiaad scendens, Polygonum hydropiper, Portulaca oleracea, Potamogeton natans etc. The fresh water wetlands of Yamuna Nagar are under threat due to human interference and other anthropogenic activities.
Key-words- Wetlands, Semi aquatic, Biodiversity, River Yamuna

INTRODUCTION- Wetlands are dynamic ecosystems, continually under-going natural changes due to infilling with sediments and nutrient subsidence and a rise in water levels during heavy floods. They sustain all life forms and perform some useful functions in the maintenance of overall balance of nature Wetlands are distinctive ecosystems and not simply mixture of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems [1]. The biota of wetland is mostly affected by the duration of flooding, the nutrients discharged from number of sources and season and flood regimes also affects the wetland biota.According to the plant response to flooding or water logging areas is described in three distinct adaptations i.e. morphological adaptations, physiological adaptations and other adaptations. Hydrophytes can be defined “large plants’’ (Macrophytes), such as aquatic mosses, liverworts, non-microscopic algae and vascular plants, which grow on a substrate that is at least periodically deficient of oxygen as a result of excessive water content. This term includes both aquatic plants and wetland plants ^[2-3].
Submerged species serve as a food source for native fauna, habitat for invertebrates, and also possess filtration capabilities. For example: Sea grasses, Floating plants cover a large surface area in the wetland. They have small roots and are only found in slow-moving water. They provide food source for avian species for example Water lilies etc.^[4]
Trees and shrubs are forested wetlands generally known as swamps ^[5]. The upper level of these swamps is influenced by high water level, which is negatively affected by dams. For example: Taxodium, mangrove etc. The wetland also supports large number of fauna. Fishes are more dependent on wetland ecosystem than any other type of habitat. Tropical fishes need coral reefs for food and mangroves for hatchery and nursery grounds. Amphibians for example: frog is the most critical amphibian species present in the wetland ^[6]. Wetlands are very useful to us. By producing resources, enabling recreational activities and controlling flood and pollution, they contribute to the national and local economies and environmental consequences. Wetlands provide important and incredible services to society, these services can neither be sold nor do they have the market value and tried to give wetlands an economic value ^[7-10]. However, it is important to note that these studies tried to assign monetary values to the services and functions that are provided by wetlands ^[11-13]. The Moore and Peter ^[14] of this paper agrees with the argument of who confess that economic values are something which must be inevitably used to legal conservation efforts of particular sites and regions; however, assigning monetary value comes with ethical and philosophical issues. India is a hub of biodiversity, encompassing a wide spectrum of habitats from tropical rain forests to alpine vegetation and from temperate forests to coastal wetlands. India contributes significantly to this latitudinal biodiversity trend with mere 2.4% of the world’s area. Wetlands are transitional zones between the terrestrial and aquatic environment [15]. The present work is conducted to study the angiospermic diversity of wetlands in Yamuna Nagar. The research work includes finding the hydrophytes, field photography at its location and studying their habit and habitat. Further survey and intensive studies in different seasons will be helpful in drafting conservational strategies and management sustainable to restore the natural habitats of the Yamuna Nagar wetlands.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Description of study area
The present study has been carried out in the duration of the 1st week, March and till July month ending in the Year 2015 at Department of Environmental Science, Guru Nanak Khalsa College, Yamuna Nagar, India. A thorough survey on the aquatic and wetland angiospermic macrophytes of the Yamuna Nagar dis-trict, Haryana was carried out for duration of six month, 2015 during, which regular excursions were made at short intervals to collect the plants of the area. During these periods of survey aquatic and wetland plants occurring in different aquatic bodies and water saturated areas of the district have been collected Plant species and its photography. The study area Yamuna Nagar is situated at the south-east of the state capital Chandigarh, India. It lies between the parallels of 31° 70’ N latitude and 77° 18’ E longitude and 255m above mean sea level of Haryana, India. It is one of the 21th district of Haryana, India. It occupies an area of 1,756 square kilometers. The climate of the district is sub-tropical and characterized by hot and dry summer in May and June, when temperature raises up to 4°C, south-west monsoon season and a bracing cold season ≥ 5°C in December and January. The majority of rainfall is received in the rainy season (July to September) with the occasional rainfall due to western disturbances in January to February.
The survey was done on the wetlands, within one km area on the both sides of four major roads diverging from Yamuna Nagar to many villages of Kalesar, Ladwa, Thana-chhappar and Kalanaur region were searched for the aquatic and wetland vegetation. The major area belongs to the fertile Indo-Gangetic Plains. The climate of the area is monsoonal and majority of rainfall is received in the rainy season (July to September) with the occasional rainfall due to western disturbances in March to June. The average annual rainfall varies from 1200 to 1300 mm in this region. The main river/streams of the district are Yamuna, Mar-kanda, Giri, Asan, and Bata Nala. The total wetland area in the district is 4893 ha and river/streams contribute 87%. The present work is conducted to the study of the angiospermic diversity of wetlands in Yamuna Nagar, Haryana, India

Fig: 1 Study site of Yamuna Nagar district,
Haryana, India.

The data was collected through secondary sources mainly from the website of Government of Haryana and Ministry Of Environment and Forest, Govt of India and Departmental library, References from research papers; books, articles, and newspaper were taken for interpretation of data.
The present study is based on the extensive surveys on the wetlands representative parts of Yamuna Nagar, Haryana and scrupulous review of the information available on aquatic plants, while conducting the surveys on biodiversity including invasive plants of the above regions, information was also gathered from local inhabitants
The methodology followed during the collection of material was as follows:

Collection: The pictures of the macropytes were taken at their natural environment. It was not possible to collect and preserve them in the herbarium sheets because many hydrophytes have spongy tissues carrying large amount of water and on drying they may even lose their shapes. A few plants have been collected moist areas and placed in the folds of newspaper. All morphological notes observed in the specimen were entered in the field notebook.

Preservation: The collected and preserved specimens were then placed in blotting sheets and placed one above the other in plant press. These blotters, when kept under pressure, remove moisture from the plants and the moisture is absorbed by the blotting sheets. The wet blotting sheets were replaced with dry ones from time to time. The process was completed in a week or more, depending upon the particular plant types, the dry specimens were kept in fresh blotting sheets and sealed in the polythene envelops

Identification: Identification is the process through which a specimen is identified by its characters with the help of standard worldwide or Indian flora viz. [16-19] and others taxon-omist. The specimen were identified by the genus and species keys and compared with full description and illustrations, thereafter it was carefully compared with earlier identified plants of that species or variety as the case may be Literature was consulted and collected from library of Guru Nanak Khalsa College, Yamuna Nagar was consulted. The plants associated with this work have been enumerated according to Bentham and Hooker’s system of classification and Mounting and labeling of some collected and preserved plants were mounted on herbarium sheets and these sheets were labeled with the species names as followed in the description of this work and lastly the presentation of the plant species are presented in tabular form according to their families, botanical names and number of species and percentage wise contribution of different families for aquatic plants.

RESULTS
The present study is based on the extensive survey and study on aquatic and marshy angiosperms and pterido-phytes plants of Yamuna Nagar, Haryana. Aquatic plants, which have been included in the present study are those plants normally found in nature growing in association with running or standing water whose level is at or above the surface of the soil, During the present study Maximum numbers of Aquatic and semi aquatic plants diversity in the present studies were observed during April to July and estimated inventory data that density of aquatic plants was greater during summer supporting the present studies (Table 1-2). From this minor study, 59 species of wetland plants belonging to 37 families were recorded to be used. Out of total 59 species, dicot (47%) species and monocot (46%) less numbers are belong to Pteridophytes (Table 1, Fig 2-15). According to habit wise contribution are is herbs (86%), large herb (5%), and small shrub (7%), shrub (2%) (Table 2, Fig 3-4). Table 1 represented that Poaceae was dominant in density and diversity among all the observed phytoplanktons. The dominancy of Poaceae in the similar physiographic region has also been reported by various workers. Relative approximate abundance of phytoplankton in different wetlands of Yamuna nagar is also investigated. It showed maximum of Poaceae, followed by Malvaceae, Solanacae, Fabaceae, Asteracae Polygonaceae, Cyperaceae, Ameranthacae, Polygonaceae, Pontederiaceae, Scrophulariaceae, Dryopteridaceae, Convolvulaceae, Apocynacae, Commelinaceae, Primulacae, Euphorbiaceae, Hydrochritaceae, Lemnaceae, Equisetaceae and lastly Adiantaceae families. In this study, we were observed that many common aquatic macro and microflora of wetlands and marshlands of Yamunanagar like as Aeschyno meneindica, Alternanthera philoxeroides, Alternanthera sessilis, Anagallis arvensis, Ceratophyllum demursum, Chrysopogon zizanioides, Commelina benghalensis, Cyperus alternifolius, Cyanotis axillaris, Cyperus rotundus, Dryopteris filix-mas, Dryopteris sieboldii, Echinochloa colona, Eichhornia crassipes, Grangeamadera spatana, Hygrophila salicifolia, Ipomoea aquatica, Forsskal, Lemna minor Linn, Lud-wigiaad scendens, Marsile aquadrifolia, Melochia corchorifolia, Nelumbo nucifera, Nymphaea pubescence, Oxalis corniculata, Polygonum hydropiper, Portulaca oleracea, Potamogeton natans, Ranunculus sceleratus, Rumex dentatus, Trapa natans, Typha angustata, Vallisnaria spiralis, Utricularia gibba, Veronica anagalis-aquatica, Xanthium strumariumetc (Fig 4-15). The recorded plants have been enumerated in Table 1 with families have been arranged according to Bentham & Hooker’s (1862-1883) System of classification. However, genera within a family and species within a genus are arranged alphabetically.



Fig 4-15: Some selected Aquatic plants of many Wetlands, Yamunanagar, Haryana, India

Table 1: Aquatic and wetland vascular plants reorded from Yamuna Nagar, Haryana

S. No.	Family	Botanical name	No. of Species
1.	Acanthaceae	Hygrophilas alicifolia (Vahl) Nees	1
2.	Adiantaceae	Adiantum capillus-veneris Linnaeus	1
3.	Amaranthaceae	Alternanther aphiloxeroides (Martius) Griseb. Alternanthe rasessilis (Linnaeus) R. Brown ex DC	2
4.	Araceae	Colocasia esculenta (Linnaeus) Schott Spirodelap olyrrhiza (Linnaeus) Schleiden	2
5.	Asteraceae	Caesulia axillaris Roxburgh Grangeam aderaspatana (Linnaeus) Poiret Xanthium strumarium Linnaeus	3
6.	Brassicaeae	Rorippa indica (Linnaeus) Hiern	1
7.	Ceratophyllaceae	Ceratophyllum demursum Linnaeus	1
8.	Commelinaceae	Commelinaben ghalensis Linnaeus Cyanotis axillaris (Linnaeus) D. Don ex Sweet	2
9.	Convolvulaceae	Ipomoea aquatic Forsskal Ipomoea fistulosa Martius ex Choisy	2
10.	Cyperaceae	Cyperus alternifolius Steudel Cyperus rotundus Miquel, F.A.W. Eleocharis dulcis (N. L. Burman) Trinius ex Henschel	3
11.	Dryopteridaceae	Dryopteris filix-mas (Linnaeus) Schott Dryopteris sieboldii (T. Moore) Kuntze	2
12.	Fabaceae	Aeschynomene indica Linnaeus	1
13.	Hydrochritaceae	Vallisnarias piralis Linnaeus	1
14.	Lemnaceae	Lemna minor Linnaeus	1
15.	Lentibulariaceae	Utricularia gibba Subsp. exeleta (R. Brown) Taylor	1
16.	Lythraceae	Ammannia baccifera Linnaeus	1
17.	Marsiliaceae	Marselia quadrifolia Linnaeus	1
18.	Menyanthaceae	Nymphoides cristata (Roxburgh) Kuntze	1
19.	Nelumboaceae	Nelumbo nucifera Gaertner	1
20.	Nympheaceae	Nymphaea pubescence	1
21.	Onagraceae	Ludwigia adscendens (Linnaeus)	1
22.	Oxalidaceae	Oxalis corniculata Linnaeus	1
23.	Poaceae	Arundo donax Linnaeus Chrysopogon zizanioides (Linnaeus) Roberty Coixlacryma jobi Linnaeus Echinochlo acolona (Linnaeus) Link Echinochloa crus-galli (Linnaeus) Palisot de Beauvois Paspalidiumge minatum (Forsskal) Stapf Paspalumpa spaloides (Michx.) Scribn. Phragmites karka (Retzius) Trinius ex Steudel Saccharum spontaneum Linnaeus. Sacciolepis interrupta (Willdenow) Stapf	10
24.	Polygonaceae	Polygonum hydropiper Linnaeus Polygonump lebeium R. Brown Rumex dentatus Linnaeus	3
25.	Pontederiaceae	Eichhornia crassipes ( Martius) Solms Monochoria vaginalis (N. L. Burman) C. Presl ex Kunth	2
26.	Portulacaeae	Portulaca oleracea Linnaeus	1
27.	Potamogetonaceae	Potamogeton natans Linnaeus	1
28.	Primulaceae	Anagallis arvensis Linnaeus	1
29.	Ranunculaceae	Ranunculus sceleratus Linnaeus	1
30.	Salviniaceae	Azolla pinnata R. Br.	1
31.	Scrophulariaceae	Scoparia dulcis Linnaeus Veronica anagalis-aquatica Linnaeus	2
32.	Sphenocleaceae	Sphenoclea zeylanica Gaertner	1
33.	Sterculiaceae	Melochia corchorifolia Linnaeus	1
34.	Trapaceae	Trapanatans var. bispinosa (Roxburgh) Makino	1
35.	Typhaceae	Typha angustifolia Linnaeus	1
36.	Urticaceae	Pilea microphylla (Linnaeus) Liebm.	1
37.	Verbenaceae	Phyla nudiflora (Linnaeus) Greene	1

Table 2: Types wise distribution of species

S. No.	Type of the species	No. of Species	Percentage (%)
1	Herbs	51	86
2	Large herb	3	5
3	Small shrub	4	7
4	Shrub	1	2

Table 3: Abbreviations used for Aquatic plants

S. No.	Classification	No. of Species	Percentage (%)
1	Eph	4	6.77
2	Eph, Hyp, Ten	1	1.69
3	Hel	31	52.54
4	Hel, Hyp	1	1.69
5	Hel, Ten, Hyp	1	1.69
6	Hyp	6	10.19
7	Hyp	1	1.69
8	Hyp, Ten	1	1.69
9	Pla	1	1.69
10	Pla, Vit	1	1.69
11	Pla	1	1.69
12	Pla, Vit	1	6.77
13	Ple	4	1.69
14	Ple , Hyp	1	1.69
15	Ros	1	1.69
16	Ten	1	1.69
17	Ten, Eph	1	1.69

[Eph= Epihydate; Hel = Helophyte; Hyp = Hyperhydate; Pla = Plankton; Ple= Pleustophyte; Ros= Rosulate; Ten= Tenagophyte; Vit = Vittate]


Fig 2: Habit wise contribution species


Fig 3: Classification wise distribution of species

DISCUSSION
In this work the methods of documentation of the spe-cies of angiosperms are similar to the observations. [10-13]. The biota of wetland is mostly affected by the dura-tion of flooding, the nutrients discharged from number of sources and season and flood regimes also affects the wetland biota and define adaptations Wetlands are distinctive ecosystems and not simply mixture of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems ac-cording to the Tiner et al. [1-2] . We tried to give wetlands an economic value loss of wetlands and their ecosystem services can have both economic and environmental consequences Wetlands provide important and incredible services to society, these services can neither be sold nor do they have the market value according by Keddy [5], Butlar et al. [6], Keddy and Paul [7], Mitsch et al. [8], BenDor et al. [9].
The present communication deals with the qualitative and quantitative analysis of phytoplankton in Western Yamuna Canal (WYC) and Yamuna River which re-ceives industrial effluents and domestic sewage from point and non-point sources accordingly to Malhotra et al. [21]. The author of this paper agrees with the argument of the economic values are something which must be in-evitably used to legal conservation efforts of particular sites is similar to Moore and Peter [14]. This survey report documented the species of angio-sperms diversity similarly finding hydrophytes families. They registered plants of many species of different families that is Poaceae with, Polygalaceae and Nymphaeaceae, Cyperaceae, Hydrocharitaceae and Scrophulariaceae similar to Kumar and Narain [20], Malhotra et al. [21], Udaya et al. [22], Saini et al. [23], Mishra and Narain [24]. Phytoplankton distribution of fresh water wetlands physical and chemical similarities to follows as Sharma et al. [25] and noticed some Ulothrix being an alga, showed a luxuriant growth near the banks of the river, mainly due to the accumulation of organic wastes (eutrophication) [26]. That is why certain aquatic plants diversity and their density are regulated by seasonal fluctuations of water temperature and apparently disappear in severe condi-tion due to the fact that certain species either become too scarce or occur as spore, resting eggs etc. which are not easily detectable of whole diversity of this wetland area.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This study summarizes the monthly and seasonal vari-ations of occurrence of aquatic plants and their influences on aquatic community of rainy water wetlands of Yamuna Nagar, Haryana with an exploration statistical data output. From this minor research work out of 59 species and 37 families maximum species evenness was recorded for Poaceae and minimum for Adiantacae. Aquatic community study is very important, because they act as primary producers, food for variety of aquatic organisms and an efficient bio-indicator for water quality. Large population of phytoplankton is thriving in this wetland which enhances its productivity. It is under heavy anthropogenic pressure due to agri-culture practice around the wetland catchment area which led to habitat loss and degradation some parts of wetlands have been drained and transform in to rice field. Hence, there is need to conserve biotic and biotic components of water body and to make people aware of the importance and threats to wetlands and their conservation, various government institutions, University, colleges, NGOs and media should take the lead and make it a mass movement. Local communities should be involved to ensure sustainability of conservation effort under taken by the government agencies. For this, they can be involved in decision-making processes required for management and conservation of wetlands.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors express their thanks to Dr. Amarjit Singh, Head, Department of Environmental Sciences and Dr.Inam, head, Department of Botany, Guru Nanak Khalsa College, Yamuna Nagar for their help rendered in the field and laboratory study. We are also thankful to the Department of Environmental science for facilities provided to carry out this research work.

REFERENCES

1. Tiner RW. Wetlands are ecotones-reality or myth? Wetlands and Ecotones: Studies on land-water interactions. Gopal B, Hillbricht-Ilkowska A. and Wetzel R.G. New Delhi, India: National Institute of Ecology and International Scientific Publications.1993; pp.1-15.
2. Tiner RW. The concept of a hydrophyte for wetland identification, Bioscience, 1991; 41: 236–247.
3. Sipple WS. Wetland identification and delineation manual. Rationale, wetland parameters, and overview of jurisdictional approach. Revised interim final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Wetlands Protection.1988; pp.1-409.
4. Hutchinson GE, A Treatise on Limnology. Limnological Botany. New York: John Wiley, 1975; pp.1-660.
5. Keddy PA. Wetland Ecology: Principles and Conservation. New York: Cambridge University Press. 2010; pp.1-497.
6. Butler S. Macquarie Concise Dictionary (5th Ed) Sydney, Australia. Macquarie Dictionary Publishers, Ltd., 2010.
7. Keddy Paul A. Wetland Ecology: Principles and Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2000; pp.1-614.
8. MitschWilliam, J. and Gosselink, J.G. The value of wetlands: importance of scale and landscape setting. Ecol. Economics. 2000; 35(200): 25-33.
9. BenDor Todd K, Nicholas Brozovic, and Varkki George Pallathucheril. The Social Impacts of Wetland Mitigation Policies in the United States. J of Plan, Lit, 2008; 22: 341-357.
10. Spash and Clive L. Ecosystems, contingent valuation and ethics: the case of wetland re- creation. Ecol Economics, 2000; 34: 195-215.
11. Brander LM, Raymond JG, Florax Mand, Vermaat J E. The Empirics of Wetland Valuation: A Comprehensive Summary and a Meta-Analysis of the Literature. Envi and Res, Economics, 2006; 33: 223-250.
12. Woodward Richard T. and Yong-Suhk Wui. The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysis. Ecol Economics, 2001; 37:257-270.
13. Carlsson F, FrykblomP, Liljenstolpe L. Valuing wetland attributes: an application of choice experiments. Ecol Economics, 2003; 47: 95-103.
14. Moore and Peter D. Wetlands: Revised Edition, Bang Hermitage (Facts on File, Inc.), New York.2008; pp.270.
15. Gupta Nutan, Anthwal Ashish, Bahuguna Abhay. Biodiversity of Mothronwala Swamp, Doon Valley. J of Am. Sci, 2006; 2(3):33-40.
16. Hooker JD. The Flora of British India, L Reeve & Co Ltd, London. 1-7, pp.1-574.
17. Bailey LH. Manual of Cultivated Plants 2 edition (The Macmillan Co., New York) 1949; pp.1-1116.
18. Bentham G. Flora Australiensis, Vol. III, Myrtacae, Compo-sitae, Lovel Reeve, London,1866
19. Singh NP, and Srivastava RC.Diversity and economic importance of wetland flora of Eastern Uttar Pradesh. Bull, Bot. Surv. India. 2000; 42(1-4): 91-108.
20. Kumar S and Narain S.Herbal remedies of wetland macro-phytes in India. Intl J of Pharma and Bio Sci, 2010; 1(2):1-12.
21. Malhotra Priyanka, Bhatnagar Anita and Chopra Girish. Phytoplankton Diversity of Western Yamuna Canal and River Yamuna in Yamunanagar, Haryana, India, Int. Res. J. Enviro. Sci. 2014; 3(2):1-7.
22. Udaya MK and Ajithadoss K. Agiosperms, Hydrophytes of five ephemeral lakes of Thiruvallur District, Tamil Nadu, India, Check List, 2010; 6(3): 270-274.
23. Saini DC, Singh SK and Kamlesh R. Biodiversity of Aquatic and Semi-Aquatic Plants of Uttar Pradesh. U P State Biodiversity Board, 2010.
24. Mishra S and Narain S. Aquatic and marshy angiospermic diversity of eastern Uttar Pradesh. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2014; 3(2): 63-75. [25] Sharma RC, Singh Neetu, Chauhan Anita. The influence of physic chemical parameter on phytoplankton distribution in a head water streams of Garhwal Himalayas: A case study, Egypt. J. of Aqu. Res, 2016; 42:11-21.
25. Sharma RC, Singh Neetu, Chauhan Anita. The influence of physic chemical parameter on phytoplankton distribution in a head water streams of Garhwal Himalayas: A case study, Egypt. J. of Aqu. Res, 2016; 42:11-21.
26. Agrawal P K. Effect of Increasing Sewage Waste on the Population of Some Microbes of River Yamuna. Int. J. Life. Sci. Scienti. Res, 2017; 3(3):1106-1109.

International Journal of Life-Sciences Scientific Research (IJLSSR) Open Access Policy Authors/Contributors are responsible for originality, contents, correct references, and ethical issues. IJLSSR publishes all articles under Creative Commons Attribution- Non-Commercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode

How to cite this article: Saini H, Kumar N: Assessment and Identification of Aquatic Diversity of Wetlands of Yamuna Nagar District, Haryana, India. Int. J. Life. Sci. Scienti. Res., 2017; 3(4): 1253-1261. DOI:10.21276/ijlssr.2017.3.4.26 Source of Financial Support:Nil, Conflict of interest: Nil