Research Article (Open access) |
---|
SSR Inst. Int. J. Life Sci., 10(1): 3650-3655, Jan 2024
A
Study to Assess Association Between Physical Activity Levels and Anthropometric
Measurements among Adults of a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital
Arun
Sharma1, Prashant Verma2, Aditya Thakur2, Rajesh
Tiwari3, Jagmohan Singh Dhakar4, Aryasree
L1*
1PG Resident, Department
of Community Medicine, Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Medical College, Jabalpur,
Madhya Pradesh, India
2Associate Professor,
Department of Community Medicine, Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Medical College,
Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
3Professor, Department of
Community Medicine, Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Medical College, Jabalpur,
Madhya Pradesh, India
4Statistician, Department
of Community Medicine, Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Medical College, Jabalpur,
Madhya Pradesh, India
*Address for Correspondence: Dr. Aryasree L, PG
Resident, Department of Community Medicine, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur-482003,
Madhya Pradesh, India
E-mail: aryasree555@gmail.com
ABSTRACT- Background: Physical inactivity is a growing concern
in India, contributing significantly to various health issues and
lifestyle-related diseases. Once known for its active and physically demanding
lifestyle, the country is now grappling with a rising trend of sedentary behaviour.
Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in Central
India's tertiary care teaching institute. The study was carried out between
January 2020 and October 2021. Participants in the study ranged in age from 18
to 65 and were either employed by or students at tertiary care teaching
institutions. The study had 348 individuals in total. Using a random number
table, each participant from their stratum was chosen at random from the list.
There were 162 undergraduates, 30 interns, 52 postgraduates, 52 faculty
members, and 52 nursing staff members.
Results: This study found that 8.62% of
respondents had insufficient physical activity, which is lower than previous
global estimates. The results showed significant associations between various
anthropometric measurements and level of physical activity. Normal anthropometric
measures were correlated with higher physical activity levels, while abnormal
measures correlated with lower activity levels.
Conclusion: It indicates the importance of sufficient
exercise to maintain a healthy body size and reduce the risk of
non-communicable diseases. Workplace wellness programs can be
implemented at the facility level that encourage physical activity during the
workday, such as standing desks, walking meetings, and fitness breaks, on-site
gyms or partnerships with nearby fitness centres walking & jogging paths.
Keywords- Physical
Activity, Exercise, Anthropometric, Lifestyle, World Health Organization
INTRODUCTION- As
per the World Health Organization (WHO), any body movement that is skeletal
muscle-driven involves energy expenditure and qualifies it as "physically
active." This covers any movement that a person does for recreation,
transportation to and from locations, or employment. Physical activity, whether
at a moderate or high intensity, benefits health. [1,2]
However, failing to
achieve the current guidelines for physical activity recommended by the WHO is
"physically inactive." This can be defined as fewer than 150 300
minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise, less than 75 150 minutes of
vigorous-intensity aerobic exercise, or a comparable mix of moderate- and
vigorous-intensity exercise spread out over the week for adults. [1]
Lack of exercise might
raise one's risk of passing away and cause other health problems. Non-active people
have a 20% to 30% higher chance of dying than appropriately active people.[3]
The estimated prevalence of physical inactivity among adults worldwide in
2016 was 27.5%2. However, more recent research showed that 28% of people
worldwide, or 1.4 billion people, are physically inactive, which is more than
one in four people. This information was published in The Lancet Global Health
in 2018. [4] There is a significantly high frequency of physical
inactivity in India. Over half of the participants in a multi-centre study that
was carried out across four areas of India were found to be inactive. [5]
Moreover, the percentage of people who participate in recreational physical
activity is less than 10%. [6]
In Madhya Pradesh, 19.6%
of people (18 69 years old) reported being physically inactive in 2017 2019.[7]
When compared to the Indian national average, this is comparatively
lower. Physical activity and a range of anthropometric measures are tightly
related. Those who are physically active typically weigh less and have lower
body fat percentages. [8] The Body Mass Index (BMI) is a widely used
and practical tool for determining an individual's weight. [9] It's
a body fat estimation determined by a person's height and weight. A higher body
mass index (BMI) may be associated with an increased risk of heart disease,
hypertension, type 2 diabetes, gallstones, breathing difficulties, and some
malignancies. [10]
The Waist-to-Hip Ratio
(WHR), a crucial measure of body fat distribution, can provide important
information about a person's overall health. A WHR greater than 1.0 may
increase the risk of developing obesity-related conditions like heart disease
and type 2 diabetes, even in cases when other obesity markers, such as BMI, are
within reasonable bounds. [11]
Obesity and
cardiovascular illnesses are two prominent health disorders for which physical
inactivity is a key risk factor. [12] We can better understand the
health concerns linked to physical inactivity by examining the association
between anthropometric measurements and physical activity.
MATERIALS & METHODS-
This
descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in Central India's tertiary
care teaching institution. The study was carried out between January 2020 and
October 2021.
Study Subjects- Adult respondents studied or worked
at tertiary care teaching institutes.
Sample Size and Sampling Method- The
sample size was determined using the formula S= Z2 x P x(1-p)/d2. In a prior
study, the prevalence (P) of physical inactivity was 27 5%. [13] In
this case, it was believed that d, or absolute error, would be 5%. After adding
a 10% non-respondent rate, 338 was the calculated sample size. An appropriate
representative sample was selected using the stratified random sampling method
based on the percentage of the entire eligible population. There were 162
undergraduates, 30 interns, 52 postgraduates, 52 faculty members, and 52
nursing staff members. The study had 348 individuals in total. Using a random
number table, each participant from their stratum was chosen at random from the
list.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria- The study only included individuals
who volunteered to take part; those who were pregnant, had experienced cardiac
problems in the past, had a locomotor disability, had neck deformities, thyroid
diseases, or Cushing's illness were excluded.
Study
tools and technique-
The
study instrument consists of two main parts: a pre-tested semi-structured
questionnaire based on the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) from
the World Health Organization. It comprises sixteen items organized into three
main categories: travel, occupation, and leisure activities. [14] Physical
activity is measured in Metabolic Equivalent for Tasks (MET), the ratio of an
individual's resting metabolic rate to their working metabolic rate. A MET, or
the energy cost of sitting still, equals one kilogram of calories per kilogram
hour. It has been calculated that an individual's calorie consumption increases
four times during moderate activity and eight times with vigorous activity
compared to sitting quietly.
For Work domain - Moderate MET value=
4.0, Vigorous MET value= 8.0.
For Transport Domain -Cycling and Walking MET
value =4.0,
For Recreation/ Leisure-Moderate MET value =4.0,
Vigorous MET value =8.0.
According to the GPAQ interpretation
rules, an individual was deemed physically active if, over a week, they engaged
in either a) more than 150 minutes of moderately-intense physical activity or
b) more than 75 minutes of vigorously-intense physical activity. c.) A
comparable mix of intense and vigorous-intense exercise that results in at
least 600 MET minutes per week. Based on the parameters, Physical activity was
divided into three categories according to MET minutes per week. A week's worth
of activity is divided into three categories: insufficiently active (600 2999
MET), moderately active (600 2999 MET), and highly active (>3000 MET).
The second part of the
study instrument contains the anthropometric
measurements, which include weight, height, waist circumference, waist hip
ratio, and neck circumference.
Statistical Analysis- Total 348 respondents' data was gathered,
and the Software Microsoft Excel 2016 was used to enter it. SPSS version 16 was
employed to analyze the data. To present the data, appropriate descriptive
statistics were applied.
Ethical consideration- The Institutional
Ethics Committee has granted ethical clearance. Not including any information
in the questionnaire that would reveal the participants' identities preserved
the participants' anonymity. Participants gave
their informed consent.
RESULTS-
The
sample consisted of 348 individuals between the ages of 18-65 years old. Over
half (54.22%) of males and under half (45.78%) of females were in the 18-30 age
group. Most participants had an Undergraduate education (55.46%), followed by
Graduate (28.45%) and post-graduate (16.09%). Most occupational groups were
Undergraduate students (46.55%), followed by Interns (8.62%), PG Students
(14.94%), Faculty (14.94%), and Nursing staff (14.94%). In terms of religion,
the vast majority were Hindu (89.37%), with smaller representations of other
faiths. Most participants were unmarried (68.39%) compared to married (31.61%).
Table 1: Socio-demographic characteristics of
the respondents (n=348)
Variables |
Frequency (n=348) |
Percentage (%) |
Age
group (years) Male |
|
|
18 -30 |
135 |
54.22 |
31-45 |
30 |
42.86 |
46-65 |
8 |
27.59 |
Age
group (years) Female |
|
|
18 -30 |
114 |
45.78 |
31-45 |
40 |
57.14 |
46-65 |
21 |
72.41 |
Education |
|
|
UG |
193. |
55.46 |
Graduate |
99. |
28.45 |
Post- Graduate |
56. |
16.09 |
Occupational Group |
|
|
.UG Student |
162. |
46.55 |
. Intern |
30. |
8.62 |
.PG Student |
52 |
14.94 |
. Faculty |
52 |
14.94 |
. Nursing staff |
52 |
14.94 |
Religion |
|
|
. Hindu |
311. |
89.37 |
. Muslim |
12. |
3.45 |
. Christian |
13. |
3.74 |
. Jain |
9. |
2.59 |
. Sikh |
2. |
0.57 |
. Others |
1 |
0.29 |
Marital Status |
|
|
. Married |
110. |
31.61 |
. Unmarried |
238. |
68.39 |
Table
2: Proportion
of level of physical activity in Respondents
Physical activity level |
Frequency (N) |
Percentage (%) |
Insufficient physical activity |
30 |
8.62
|
Moderate physical activity |
286 |
82.18
|
Vigorous physical activity |
32 |
9.2
|
Total |
348 |
100 |
The
results showed that most respondents had moderate physical activity (82.18%). A
moderate level indicates that they engage in some activity on most days of the
week. Only a small proportion reported vigorous physical activity (9.2%),
characterized as participating in intensive activity regularly. Fewer
respondents had insufficient physical activity (8.62%), denoting little to no
activity. Over 90% of participants engaged in at least a moderate level of
exercise during most weeks. While most were physically active to some degree,
just under 10% can be considered insufficiently active according to the
presented categories.
Table
3: Association
between Anthropometric Measurements and Level of Physical Activity
BMI Category |
Level
of Physical activity |
|||
Insufficiently |
Moderate |
Highly |
p-value |
|
Normal |
0 (0 %) |
188 (86.24 %) |
30 (13.76 %) |
<0.0001* |
High risk |
30 (23.08 %) |
98 (75.38 %) |
2 (1.54 %) |
|
Waist Circumference |
|
|||
Normal |
14
(4.76 %) |
248
(84.35 %) |
32
(10.88 %) |
<0.0001* |
High risk |
16
(29.63 %) |
38
(70.37 %) |
0
(0 %) |
|
Waist Hip Ratio |
|
|||
Normal |
9
(5.11 %) |
143
(81.25 %) |
24
(13.64 %) |
0.0017* |
High risk |
21
(12.21 %) |
143
(83.14 %) |
8
(4.65 %) |
|
Neck circumference |
|
|||
Normal |
9
(4.33 %) |
171
(82.21 %) |
28
(13.46 %) |
<0.0001* |
High risk |
21
(15 %) |
115
(82.14 %) |
4
(2.86 %) |
* Statistically Significant
The
results showed significant associations between various anthropometric
measurements and level of physical activity. For BMI, 13.76% of individuals
with normal BMI (between 18.5-24.9 kg/m2) were highly active
compared to only 1.54% of those with high BMI (>30 kg/m2) who were mostly
moderately active (75.38%) or insufficiently active (23.08%). Similarly, 10.88%
of individuals with normal waist circumference (<90 cm for men and <80 cm
for women) engaged in highly active physical activity compared to 0% of those
with high-risk waist circumference (>90 cm for men and >80 cm for women)
who predominantly had moderate (70.37%) or insufficient (29.63%) activity
levels. Moreover, compared to just 4.65% of people with high-risk waist-hip
ratios (>0.9 for men and >0.85 for women), 13.64% of people with normal
waist-hip ratios (<0.9 for males and <0.85 for women) had high activity
levels. Comparing those with high-risk neck circumference (>37 cm for males
and >34 cm for women) to those with normal neck circumference (<37 cm for
men and <34 cm for women), it was found that 13.46% of the former had high
activity levels. Higher levels of physical activity related to normal
anthropometric measurements, but lower levels of activity were correlated with
aberrant values.
DISCUSSION-
This
study found that 8.62% of respondents had insufficient physical activity, which
is lower than previous global estimates. A 2016 study analysing data from over
1.9 million individuals in 168 countries
The
results of the current study differ from another previous study in India that
assessed physical activity levels in 14,227 individuals.
55.16%
of the respondents in the present study had high-risk body mass index, i.e.,
overweight and obese. The percentage of high-risk body mass index was reported
to be 40.12% among dental health professionals.
CONCLUSIONS-
The
study concluded that a moderate degree of physical activity was exhibited by
most of the respondents. Higher levels of physical activity were correlated
with a normal BMI, waist circumference, waist-hip ratio, and Neck circumference.
In comparison, abnormal anthropometric measures were associated with lower
activity levels and insufficient physical activity. This indicates the
importance of sufficient exercise to maintain a healthy body size and reduce
the risk of non-communicable diseases. Workplace wellness programs can
be implemented at the facility level that encourages physical activity during
the workday, such as standing desks, walking meetings, and fitness breaks. Facilities
for physical activity like on-site gyms, jogging, or walking paths can be
provided.
CONTRIBUTION
OF AUTHORS
Research concept & design- Prashant Verma, Aditya Thakur, Arun
Sharma
Supervision- Prashant Verma, Aditya Thakur,
Rajesh Tiwari, Jagmohan Singh Dhakar
Data collection- Arun Sharma
Data analysis and Interpretation- Arun Sharma, Aryashree
Writing article- Aryashree, Aditya Thakur
Critical review- Prashant Verma, Aditya Thakur,
Jagmohan Singh Dhakar
Article editing- Aditya Thakur
REFERENCES
1. World
Health Organization. Technical Annex (version dated 26
December 2022). Updated Appendix 3 of the WHO Global
NCD Action Plan 2013-2030. Available from:
https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/ncds/mnd/2022-app3-technical-annex-v26jan2023.pdf?sfvrsn=62581aa3_5.
2. Physical
activity fact sheet [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jan 29]. Available from:
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-HEP-HPR-RUN-2021.2.
3. Physical
activity [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jan 16]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/physical-activity.
4. Launch
of new global estimates on levels of physical activity in adults [Internet].
[cited 2023 Jan 16]. Available from:
https://www.who.int/news/item/05-09-2018-launch-of-new-global-estimates-on-levels-of-physical-activity-in-adults.
5. Mohanty
S, Sahoo J, Epari V, Ganesh GS, Panigrahi SK, Mohanty S, et al. Prevalence,
Patterns, and Predictors of Physical Inactivity in an Urban Population of
India. Cureus, 14(6): e26409. Doi: 10.7759/cureus.26409.
6. Gupta R, Joshi P, Mohan V, et al
Epidemiology and causation of coronary heart disease and stroke in India. Heart,
2008; 94(1): 16-26. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2007.132951.
7. Pengpid
S, Peltzer K. Prevalence and associated factors of physical inactivity among
middle-aged and older adults in India: results of a national cross-sectional
community survey. BMJ Open, 2022; 12(8): e058156.
8. Dunsky
A, Zach S, Zeev A, Goldbourt U, Shimony T, Goldsmith R, et al. Level of
physical activity and anthropometric characteristics in old age-results from a
national health survey. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act., 2014; 11: 149 57. doi
10.1007/s11556-014-0139-y
9. How
useful is the body mass index (BMI)? - Harvard Health [Internet]. [cited 2023
Jan 29]. Available from:
https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/how-useful-is-the-body-mass-index-bmi-201603309339.
10. Assessing
Your Weight and Health Risk [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jan 29]. Available from: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/educational/lose_wt/risk.htm.
11. Waist-to-hip
ratio: How does it affect your health? [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jan 29].
Available from: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/319439.
12. Gupta
A, Vaid R. Association of Physical Exercises with Anthropometric Parameters and
Blood Pressure Among Medical Students: A Prospective Study in Jammu. Int J Res
Rev., 2023; 10(2): 692-98.
doi: 10.52403/ijrr.20230284.
13. Aslesh
OP, Mayamol P, Suma RK, Usha K, Sheeba G, et al. Level of Physical Activity in
Population Aged 16 to 65 Years in Rural Kerala, India. Asia Pac J Public Health,
2016; 28(1 Suppl): 53S-61S.
14. Global
physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ) [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 16].
Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/global-physical-activity-questionnaire.
15. Guthold
R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical
activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys
with 1 9 million participants. Lancet Glob Health, 2018; 6: e1077 86.
16. Anjana
RM, Pradeepa R, Das AK, Deepa M, Bhansali A, et al. Physical activity and
inactivity patterns in India-results from the ICMR-INDIAB study (Phase-1)
[ICMR-INDIAB-5]. Int J BehavNutr Phys Activity, 2014; 11(1): 1 11.
17. Vaz
M, Bharathi AV. Perceptions of the Intensity of Specific Physical Activities in
Bangalore, South India: Implications for Exercise Prescription. J Assoc
Physicians India, 2004; 52: 541-44.
18. Gandhi
H, Vaishali K, Prem V, Vijayakumar K, Adikari P, et al. A Survey on Physical
Activity and Noncommunicable disease risk factors among Physicians in tertiary
care Hospitals, Mangalore. National J Commu Med., 2012; 3(1): 7 13.