Research Article (Open access) |
---|
SSR Inst. Int. J. Life Sci., 10(1):
3590-3598,
Jan 2024
Comparing Oral
Tranexamic Acid and Q-Switched Nd-YAG Laser for Melasma: A Randomized Study
Abdul
Sahid Khan1, Anjana Sathyanath 1,
Ashitha Mary Kurian1, Prasenjeet Mohanty2, Diptiranjani Bisoyi3*, Jayashree Mohanty2,
Manjulata Dash4
1Senior
Resident, Department of Dermatology, SCB MCH, Cuttack, Odisha, India
2Professor,
Department of Dermatology, SCB MCH, Cuttack, Odisha, India
3Assistant
Professor, Department of Dermatology, SCB MCH, Cuttack, Odisha, India
4Professor,
Department of Dermatology, DD MCH, Keonjhar, Odisha,
India
*Address for
Correspondence: Dr. Diptiranjani
Bisoyi, Department of Dermatology, SCB
MCH, Cuttack, Odisha, India
E-mail: diptiranjanibisoyi@gmail.com
ABSTRACT-
Background: Addressing
the challenges of limited therapeutic options for melasma, this study explores
the novel approach of combining oral Tranexamic acid with Q switched Nd-YAG
laser. The aim is to evaluate the efficacy of this combination against oral
Tranexamic acid (TNA) alone in treating melasma.
Method: This study was conducted as a prospective,
randomized, open-label study with a sample size of 50, Group A (25 patients)
received oral Tranexamic acid along with Nd-YAG laser treatment every 15 days
for 3 months. Group B received only oral Tranexamic acid for the same duration.
Clinical photographs were taken at each session, and patients were followed up
for 3 and 6 months.
Result:
The study found a
49.96% mMASI change in Group A and a 38.74% change in
Group B after 3 months. Both groups exhibited similar percentages of reversal,
with the combination group showing a marginally higher percentage. However, the
difference was statistically insignificant (p=0.55). A limitation of the study
was its small sample size.
Conclusion: The combination therapy
demonstrated better responses for both mixed and dermal melasma types. Notably,
laser treatment alone did not yield significant outcomes and carried a higher
risk of hyperpigmentation, making it unsuitable for treating epidermal melasma.
Keywords: Melasma, Tranexamic
Acid, TNA, Q switched Nd-YAG Laser, Laser Therapy
INTRODUCTION- Melasma is a
form of acquired symmetrical hypermelanosis of the
face, mainly affecting the nose, chin, forehead, and malar area. It is characterized
by irregular brownish-black macules.[1] Fitzpatrick skin types IV
through VI are predominantly found in females in the reproductive age range and
are common in the Indian, Chinese, and Hispanic ethnic groups. Three recognised types of behaviour
exist: the most common is centrofacial, while
mandibular is the least common. Although the precise origin of melasma is still
unknown, Ortonne et
al. [2] discovered that oral contraceptives, breastfeeding, and
pregnancy all increased UVA exposure and had a hormonal effect on the
condition's development. Based on the length of the condition, melasmas can be
divided into two categories: temporary melasmas, which disappears a year after
hormonal stimulation (such as pregnancy or OCP usage), and persistent melasmas,
which is typically caused by UVR and continues longer than a year after the
hormonal stimulus is stopped. It is possible to distinguish between four types
of melasma thanks to Wood's light examination and visible light.
Increased melanin and pigment accentuation on Wood's
lamp epidermal type, primarily in the suprabasal and
basal epidermis [3,4]. Although melanin-loaded macrophages are
present in the perivascular distribution of the superficial and deep dermis,
the dermal form does not exhibit Wood's lamp accentuation. The inapparent form
appears murky in Wood's light; however, the mixed variety has a deep brown colour and features from both. The patient's quality of
life has been adversely affected and their emotional and psychological stress
levels have escalated due to their cosmetically unacceptable resistance to most
forms of therapy. [5] Traditional therapeutic treatments include
alpha and beta hydroxy acid peels, hydroquinone, tretinoin, mometasone, azeleic acid, and Kojic acid depigmentation lotions. All of
these options, meanwhile, have disadvantages of their own.
According to recent studies, the hemostatic medication
tranexamicacid (TNA) has a hypopigmentary
effect on melasma lesions and lessens UVA-induced pigmentation. These results
suggest that TNA may prove to be an effective melasma treatment. TNA reduces
the activity of epidermal melanocyte tyrosinase by blocking the
plasminogen/plasmin pathway, which keeps melanocytes and keratinocytes from
interacting. [6] Tranexamic acid also decreases cutaneous
vascularity and [7-9] the quantity of mast cells by inhibiting
fibroblast growth factor, decreasing mast cell activity, and restricting
plasmin activity triggered by UV light. [11 13]
This statement suggests that recent studies have
demonstrated the efficacy and rapid action of Q Switched Nd-YAG lasers,
highlighting them as more effective and faster-acting than traditional
therapeutic approaches.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This
interventional study was conducted in Tertiary care Hospital from August 2020
to November 2021. All the patients with Melasma of age 18 to 50 years attending
Dermatology OPD were included. Convenient randomized sampling method was used
to divide 50 patients into two groups.
Inclusion
criteria
Patients without a history
of coagulopathies, cardiac diseases, or severe systemic disorders
No known allergy to
Tranexamic acid
Absence of oral
anticoagulant drug usage or any other photosensitizing drugs (e.g.,
tetracycline, spironolactone, phenytoin, carbamazepine) in the last 1 month
No use of other
depigmenting oral or topical agents in the past 1 month
Females without a history
of pregnancy or lactation in the last 12 months
Absence of oral
contraceptive pill or hormonal replacement therapy usage in the past 12 months
Exclusion criteria
Patients with a history
of coagulopathies, cardiac diseases, or severe systemic disorders
Use of oral anticoagulant
drugs or any other photosensitizing drugs in the last 1 month
Known allergy to
Tranexamic acid
Use of other depigmenting
oral or topical agents in the past 1 month
Use of oral contraceptive
pills or hormonal replacement therapy in the past 12 months
Randomization- It was done by computerized random number allocation, 50 patients
divided into two groups for oral plus laser therapy and oral therapy
alone as Group A and Group B respectively. After obtaining written informed
consent, thorough history, clinical examination and baseline investigations
were done as per the data collection pro-forma. The lesions were examined under a Woods lamp. The intensity of melasma
was evaluated using the modified mMASI method.
Throughout treatment and for an extra three months after, all patients were
instructed to use wide spectrum sunscreen with an SPF of at least thirty.
In Group A,
patients Tab Tranexamic acid 250mg was given orally twice daily for 3 months,
along with that Nd-YAG Laser was used simultaneously once in every 15days.In Group B
patients only Tab Tranexamic acid 250mg was given orally in twice daily dose
for a period of 3 months.
Laser Procedure- Participants in the study were excluded if they had
taken any oral anticoagulants or other photosensitizing medications, such as
tetracycline, spironolactone, phenytoin, or carbamazepine, in the month prior,
or if they had a history of coagulopathies, heart problems, severe systemic
disorders, or if they knew they were allergic to tranexamic acid. End point was
noted when there was formation of erythema or white crusts. (Fig. 1). Possible
side effects like erythema, edema, pain, hyperpigmentation or burning sensation
in Group A and oligomenorrhoea or amenorrhoea in both
groups patients were asked on every visit. Clinical photographs in front of
green background were taken in before each session and at follow-up period up to 3
months.
Fig. 1: Procedures during Q-switched Nd-YAG
laser ablation
The intensity of melasma was
evaluated using the modified melasma area and severity index scoring (MASI)
method as 0.3A(f)D(f)+0.3A(lm)D(lm)+0.3A(rm)D(rm)+0.1A(c)D(c)
in a range of 0-24 and was calculated by comparing the percentage of
improvement for each patient's response to their original score (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2: Modified MASI Scoring
More than 60% change in mMASI
after 3 months of treatment was considered as excellent response, 40-60% as
good response and <40% was considered as poor response.
Statistical Analysis- The data was analyzed using SPSS 25.0. A component of the statistical
analysis was calculating the means and proportions. An unpaired t-test was used
to compare the mean mMASI scores of the two
intervention groups at 0 and 3 months, as well as 3 and 6 months. The p<0.05
significance level was applied.
Ethical approval- Institutional ethical committee clearance and CTRI Registration was
obtained (CTRI/2021/01/030539).
RESULTS- Mean mMASI
score among centrofacial pattern and malar pattern
was tabulated among the treatment groups who received oral tranexamic acid with
Q switched Nd YAG laser and only oral tranexamic acid (Table 1).
Table 1: Mean mMASI
score according to pattern of skin involvement
Pattern |
Group A mMASI 0
months (Mean + SD) |
GroupB mMASI 0
months (Mean + SD) |
Centrofacial |
6.95 (+2.84) |
5.13 (+1.26) |
Malar |
4.33 (+1.75) |
3.89 (+0.93) |
Mean mMASI score among group
with epidermal, dermal and mixed involvement in wood s lamp was tabulated among
the treatment group A and B Table-2.
Table 2: MeanmMASI
score according to woods lamp
Woods Lamp |
Group A mMASI 0
months (Mean + SD) |
Group B mMASI 0
months (Mean + SD) |
Epidermal |
5.75 (+1.96) |
5.00 (+1.15) |
Dermal |
3.67 (+1.15) |
4.00 (+1.00) |
Mixed |
7.80 (+3.33) |
4.70 (+1.50) |
Table 3 and Table 4 shows association between the mMASI score from 0 to 3 months within the two intervention
groups clinically and in wood s lamp examination respectively. There was
statistically significant association between the change in the mMASI score from 0 to 3 months.
Table 3: mMASI score change from 0 month to 3 months
mMASI score |
Group A |
Group B |
t |
p-value |
Change
from 0 month to 3 months |
49.96% (+23.42) |
38.74% (+13.71) |
2.07 |
0.04 |
Table 4: 4mMASI score change from 0 month to 3
months according to woods lamp types
Change
from 0 month to 3 months mMASI score |
Group-A |
Group-B |
t |
p-value |
Epidermal |
37.17 (+28.47) |
39.19 (+18.33) |
-0.19 |
0.85 |
Dermal |
64.44 (+3.85) |
35.33 (+10.95) |
4.32 |
<0.01 |
Mixed |
60.95 (+6.86) |
39.99 (+10.18) |
5.40 |
<0.01 |
Table 5 shows association between the
mMASI score from 3 to 6 months within the two
intervention groups. There was no significant association between the mMASI score within the two intervention groups.
Table 5: mMASI score change from 3 months to 6 months within the two
intervention groups.
mMASI score |
Group-A Mean change (%) |
Group-B Mean change (%) |
t |
p-value |
Change
from 3 months to 6 months |
-32.40% (+26.72) |
-28.13% (+ 23.62) |
-0.60 |
0.55 |
Table 6 shows association of treatment response within
the two intervention groups. Excellent treatment response was significantly
higher among the patients who received oral Tranexamic acid with Q switched Nd
YAG laser compared to those who received only oral tranexamic acid (p-value:
0.02) which was shown in following clinical image (Fig. 3 and 4).
Table 6: Treatment response at 3 months
within the two intervention groups.
Intervention |
>60% (Excellent) |
40-60% (Good) |
<40% (Poor) |
p-value |
Group A |
6 (24.0%) |
16 (64.0%) |
3 (12.0%) |
0.02# |
Group B |
1 (4.0%) |
13 (52.0%) |
11 (44.0%) |
#Fisher s Exact Test
Fig. 3: Patient treated TNA+Nd YAG at 0 month(A),
showing excellent response at 3 months (B), visible recurrence at 6 months (C)
Fig. 4: Patients with TNA at 0 month (A), at 3 months
(B) showing good response, at 6 months mild recurrence (C)
Table 7 shows association of
treatment response with the type of disease involvement in Group-A according to
wood s lamp examination. There was a significant association of treatment
response with the type of disease based upon the region involved (p-value:
0.01).
Table 7: Treatment response in Oral
Tranexamic acid with Q switched Nd YAG laser (Group-A) in wood s lamp
examination
Woods Lamp |
Excellent n (%) |
Good n (%) |
Poor n (%) |
p-value |
Epidermal |
00 (0.0%) |
09 (75.0%) |
03 (25.0%) |
0.01# |
Dermal |
02 (66.7%) |
01 (33.3%) |
00 (0.0%) |
|
Mixed |
04 (40.0%) |
06 (60.0%) |
00 (0.0%) |
#Fisher s exact test
Table 8 shows association of treatment response with
the type of disease involvement in Group-B patients. There was no significant
association of treatment response with the type of disease based upon the
region involved.
Table 8: Treatment response with only oral tranexamic acid
Woods Lamp |
Excellent n (%) |
Good n (%) |
Poor n (%) |
p-value |
Epidermal |
01 (10.0%) |
05 (50.0%) |
04 (40.0%) |
0.90# |
Dermal |
00 (0.0%) |
02 (40.0%) |
03 (60.0%) |
|
Mixed |
00 (10.0%) |
06 (60.0%) |
04 (40.0%) |
#Fisher s exact test
Adverse Events- Treatment with Nd YAG laser resulted
in hyperpigmentation in 3 patients (1 of them was lost to follow up). Single
case of Hypomenorrhoea was seen in both the groups
whereas 1 case of amenorrhoea was reported in Group
treated with both Oral Tranexamic acid and Nd YAG laser (Fig. 5, 6).
Fig. 5: Patients treated with TNA+Qs Nd
YAG laser showing paradoxical hyperpigmentation at 3mnth, right side image
Fig.
6: Distribution of various adverse
events within the two intervention groups
DISCUSSION- Tranexamic acid (TNA) is an artificial lysine analogue having
antifibrinolytic effects.[10] When exposed to UV radiation,
keratinocytes create more plasminogen activator and increase the activity of
plasmin. This ultimately results in the release of arachidonic acid, which
employs prostaglandins to facilitate melanogenesis.[11 13] Nijor [14]
conducted the first review and report on the effects of tranexamic acid
on melasma in 1979. Hajime et al. [15] discovered
in 1985 that the intensity of their melasma was lessened when they took 1 to
1.5 g of oral tranexamic acid every day. In 1998, eleven melasma
patients were treated with oral tranexamic acid (0.75 1.5 g/day) [16].
But after the drug was withdrawn, the pigmentation came back. For a period of
6 8 weeks, vitamins C and E were given along with 250 mg of tranexamic acid
three times a day by Zhu and Yang [17] and Liu et al. [18]. They saw a noticeable reduction in
pigmentation. Mafune et al. [19] administered
two 750 mg oral tranexamic acid pills three times a day.
In the first controlled trial, conducted in
2013, Cho et al. compared patients treated with neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser or intense pulse light with those
who received the same treatment but were not prescribed tranexamic acid. As an
adjuvant, the patients were given 500 mg each day.[20-23] Kato et
al. [21] found that oral TNA at 750 mg/day did not significantly
reduce the risk of hyperpigmentation in individuals with senile lentigo
following Q-switched ruby laser treatment. Darker skin types should
avoid using Q-switched ruby lasers because of the increased risk of
hyperpigmentation following treatment.[25,26] Wattanakrai
et al. [24] report that there was a transient response to
melasma treatment with Qs-Nd: YAG laser. Conversely, Shin et al.
found that melasma patients could receive a minimally invasive treatment option
when oral TNA was used in conjunction with a low-fluence QS-Nd: YAG laser.[28]
They discovered a statistically significant drop in the mMASI score, just like we did.
In our study the mean mMASI
at the baseline or at 0 months was overall found to be 6.49+3.29 in
group A, whereas, the mean MASI by Kar et al was 13.54+7.19.[21] In group B the baseline mMASI
was 4.75+0.78 in our study, and the same by Khurana et al was found to
be 7.48+3.73.[22]
In our study the percentage of mMASI
change from baseline to 3 months of treatment was 49.96% (+23.42) in group A patient treated with tranexamic acid and
laser, in comparison to the group B patients treated with only tranexamic acid
with mean change of 38.74% (+13.71), with statistically significant p-value of 0.04. Kar et al. [21] with usage of low fluence QS Nd-YAG laser found the
change in MASI of 47.93% which is similar to our study. The study by
Khurana et al. with only oral tranexamic acid treatment had the change in mMASI of 57.48% which is significantly higher to our study.[22]
In wood s lamp classification of melasma in group A
patients treated with the combination therapy has shown change in mMASI percentage in mixed type and dermal type which is
statistically significant when compared to the the
group B patients of mixed type. The patients with epidermal type of melasma
showed similar results in both groups. The study conducted by Agamia et al. the
overall change in percentage of mMASI was maximum
with epidermal type of melasma, followed by mixed type, and the least
improvement was seen in dermal type which is not in accordance to our study.[23]
All the 49 patients that completed the treatment and
follow up period have reported reversal in treatment response at the end of
follow up period. Khurana et al. [22] reported that 6.25% of patients showed return of the
pigmentation, but the percentage the reversal was not mentioned.
All the patients treated with combination therapy
showed mild burning sensation and pain over the site of laser therapy, but it
was transient and disappeared in 1-2 hours. Three (12%) patients treated with
combination therapy showed development of paradoxical hyperpigmentation out of
which one patient discontinued the treatment mid-way and was lost to follow up.
Kar et al. [21] reported paradoxical
hyperpigmentation or PIH in 28.5% cases treated with high fluenceNd-YAG
laser. The other adverse events included temporary amenorrhoea
during the treatment period in 1 patient , and 2 patients complained of hypomenorrhoea. Khurana et al reported gastritis as most
common adverse effect is 6.5% of cases and oligomenorrhoea in 3.12% cases.[22] Agamia et al. reported slight menstrual changes in 33%
of cases and GI upset in 16.7% age cases.[23] No other adverse effects were reported during the
treatment and follow up period.
CONCLUSIONS - To our knowledge the comparison of
oral tranexamic acid with the combination of oral tranexamic acid and laser has
not been studied much in Indian population. The combination therapy was found
to act better on dermal and mixed type of melasma. The laser therapy was not found
to be suitable for epidermal type of melasma for not been able to provide
significant result and with increased rate of hyperpigmentation.
The objective of proving whether
concurrent use of oral tranexamic acid with Nd-YAG laser will decrease the
adverse effects of laser, could not be established significantly in our study.
More such randomised trials in larger study sample are required to
establish the above findings.
Research concept- Khan Sahid Abdul, Mohanty Prasenjeet
Research
design- Mohanty Prasenjeet,
Khan Sahid Abdul
Supervision-Mohanty Prasenjeet, Mohanty Jayashree, Bisoyi Diptiranjani
Materials- Khan Sahid Abdul, Mohanty Prasenjeet
Data
collection- Khan Sahid Abdul, Dash Manjulata, Mohanty Jayashree, Sathyanath Anjana
Data
analysis and Interpretation- Khan Sahid Abdul, Bisoyi Diptiranjani, Sathyanath Anjana
Literature
search- Khan Sahid Abdul, Mohanty Prasenjeet, Kurian Mary Ashitha
Writing
article-Bisoyi Diptiranjani,
Kurian Mary Ashitha, Sathyanath Anjana
Critical
review-Mohanty Prasenjeet, Mohanty Jayashree, Kurian Mary
Ashitha
Article
editing- Dash Manjulata, Bisoyi Diptiranjani, Kurian Mary Ashitha, Sathyanath Anjana
Final
approval-MohantyPrasenjeet, Bisoyi Diptiranjani,
Khan Sahid Abdul
REFERENCES
1.
Grimes PE. Melasma.
Etiologic and therapeutic considerations. Arch Dermatol., 1995; 131(12):1453-57.
2.
Ortonne
JP, Arellano I, Berneburg M, et al. A global survey
of the role of ultraviolet radiation and hormonal influences in the development
of melasma. J Eur Acad Dermatol
Venereol., 2009; 23(11): 1254‐1262.
3.
Hann SK, Im S, Chung WS, Kim DY. Pigmentary disorders in the South
East. Dermatol Clin., 2007; 25(3): 431 38.
4.
Sanchez NP, Pathak MA,
Sato S, et al. Melasma: a clinical, light microscopic, ultrastructural, and
immunofluorescence study. J Am Acad Dermatol., 1991; 4(6):
698 710.
5.
Guinot C, Cheffai S, Latreille J, et al. Aggravating factors for
melasma: a prospective study in 197 Tunisian patients. J Eur
Acad Dermatol Venereol.,
2010; 24(9): 1060 69.
6.
Maeda K, Tomita Y.
Mechanism of the inhibitory effect of tranexamic acid on melanogenesis in
cultured human melanocytes in the presence of keratinocyte-conditioned medium.
J Health Sci., 2007; 53: 389 96.
7.
Na JI, Choi SY, Yang SH,
Choi HR, et al. Effect of tranexamic acid on melasma: a clinical trial with
histological evaluation. J Eur Acad
Dermatol Venereol., 2013; 27: 1035 39.
8.
Padhi T, Pradhan S. Oral
tranexamic acid with fluocinolone-based triple combination cream versus
fluocinolone-based triple combination cream alone in melasma: an open labeled
randomized comparative trial. Indian J Dermatol., 2015; 60: 520.
9.
Tan AW, Sen P, Chua SH,
Goh BK. Oral tranexamic acid lightens refractory melasma. Australas
J Dermatol., 2017; 58: e105 08.
10. Dunn
CJ, Goa KL. Tranexamic acid: a review of its use in surgery and other
indications. Drugs, 1999; 57: 1005 32.
11. Akashima A, Yasuda S, Mizuno N. Determination of the
action spectrum for UV-induced plasminogen activator synthesis in mouse
keratinocytes in vitro. J Dermatol Sci., 1992; 4: 11-17.
12. Maeda
K, Naganuma M. Topical trans4-aminomethylcyclohexanecarboxylic acid prevents
ultraviolet radiationinduced pigmentation. J Photochem Photobiol B., 1998; 47:
136 41.
13. Takashima
A, Yasuda S, Mizuno N. Determination of the action spectrum for UV-induced
plasminogen activator synthesis in mouse keratinocytes in vitro. J
Dermatol Sci., 1992; 4: 11 17.
14. Nijor T. Treatment of
melasma with tranexamic acid. Clin Res 1979; 13: 3129-31.
15. Hajime M, Mineo T,
Yoshio T. Oral administration therapy with tranexamic acid for melasma. Nishinihon J Dermatol., 1995; 47: 1101-04.
16. Higashi N. Treatment of
melasma with oral tranexamic acid. Skin Res., 1998; 30: 676-80.
17. Zhu HJ, Yang XH. The clinical study of acidumtranex-amicum on melasma. Pharm Program, 2001; 3: 178-81.
18. Liu H, Kou CC, Yeung CW.
Effectiveness of tranexamic acid in treating melasma and observation of its
safety. Chin J Med Aesthet Cosmetol.,
2005; 11:361-3.
19. Mafune E, Morimoto Y, Iizuka Y. Tranexamic acid and
melasma. Farmacia, 2008; 44: 437-42.
20. Cho HH, Choi M, Cho S, Lee JH. Role of oral
tranexamic acid in melasma patients treated with IPL and low fluence QS Nd: YAG
laser. J Dermatol Treat., 2013; 24: 292-96.
21. Kato
H, Araki J, Eto H, Doi K, Hirai R, et al. A prospective randomized controlled
study of oral tranexamic acid for preventing post-inflammatory
hyperpigmentation after Q-switched Ruby laser. Derm Surg., 2011; 37: 605 10.
22. Kang
HY, Ortonne JP. What should be considered in
treatment of melasma. Ann Dermatol., 2010; 22: 373 78.
23. Kono
T, Manstein D, Chan HH, Nozaki M, Anderson RR. Q
switched ruby versus long pulsed dye laser delivered with compression for
treatment of facial lentigines in Asians. Lasers Surg Med., 2006; 138: 94 97.
24. Wattanakrai
P, Mornchan R, Eimpunth S.
Low-fluence Qs witched neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (1,064 nm) laser
for the treatment of facial melasma in Asians. Dermatol Surg., 2010; 36(1): 76 87.
25. Shin
JU, Park J, Oh SH, et al. Oral tranexamic acid enhances the efficacy of
low-fluence 1064-nm quality-switched neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet
laser treatment for melasma in Koreans: a randomized, prospective trial.
Dermatol Surg., 2013; 39 (3pt1): 435 42.
26. Kar
HK, Gupta L, Chauhan A. A comparative study on efficacy of high and low fluence
Q-switched Nd: YAG laser and glycolic acid peel in melasma. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol., 2012; 78: 165-71. doi:
10.4103/0378-6323.93633.
27. Khurana
VK, Misri RR, Agarwal S, Thole AV, Kumar S, Anand T. A randomized, open-label,
comparative study of oral tranexamic acid and tranexamic acid microinjections
in patients with melasma. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol., 2019; 85: 39-43. doi: 10.4103/ijdvl.IJDVL_801_16.
28. Agamia
N, Apalla Z, Salem W, Abdallah W. A comparative study
between oral tranexamic acid versus oral tranexamic acid and Q-switched Nd-YAG
laser in melasma treatment: a clinical and dermoscopic
evaluation. J Dermatolog Treat., 2021; 32(7): 819-26.