Research Article (Open access)

SSR Inst. Int. J. Life Sci., 10(1): 3477-3483, Jan 2024

 

Evaluate Mobile Phone Usage and its Impact on Student Health.at Murarji Desai College of  Residential Sciences, Bagalkot

Lakshmavva Gondi1*, Jayashree Itti2

1Lecturer, Department of Community Health Nursing, Shri B.V.V.S. Institute of Nursing Sciences, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India

2Principal, Department of Community Health Nursing, Shri B.V.V.S. Institute of Nursing Sciences, Navanagar, Bagalkote, Karnataka, India

 

*Address for Correspondence: Lakshmavva Gondi, Lecturer, Department of Community Health Nursing, Shri B.V.V.S. Institute of Nursing Sciences, Navanagar Bagalkot, Karnataka, India

E-mail: laxmigondi9@gmail.com

ABSTRACT- Background: Mobile phone addiction is very harmful to all populations, especially children and students. They had symptoms like headaches, eye irritation, restlessness, and stress. This study aimed to assess the addiction to smartphone and their health impacts among students.

Methods: A school-based cross-sectional study was conducted from March 13 to April 8, 2023. A total of 80 students were selected using the stratified random sampling technique. The study was conducted at Murarji Desai Residential Science College, Bagalkot. A structured and prepared questionnaire was used to collect baseline data. Addiction to mobile phones was assessed using a questionnaire and their health impacts.

Result: Assessment of Smartphone Addiction and its Health Impacts on Students. The range value is 0 15, the mean value is 9.46, the minimum value is 0, the maximum value is 15, the standard deviation is 0.48, and the mean percentage is 31.95%. The calculated chi-square value of 4.14 (p=0.04) suggests there is a significant association between Smartphone addiction and education among students. The calculated chi-square value of 4.13 (p=0.04) suggests there is a significant association between addiction to smartphone and their health impacts (burning sensation of the eyes) among students.

Conclusion: The findings of this study showed that there is an association between Smartphone addiction and their health impacts and the need to improve their health among students.

Keywords:  Health impacts, High school, PU students, Smartphone addiction

INTRODUCTION- Mobile phones, often known as handphones, are potent communication tools that were originally shown off by Motorola in 1973 and were on sale in 1984.[1] Handphones have become an essential part of our lives in the past several years. Every year, the number of mobile phone subscriptions rises steadily. Globally, there were about seven billion users as of 2016. Between 2000 and 2015, the percentage of people using the internet climbed seven times, from 6.5% to 43% worldwide. Additionally, the proportion of homes having internet connection grew from 18% in 2005 to 46% in 2015.[2] Parlay, there is a growing trend of smartphone addiction. 84% of respondents to a 2012 Time Mobility Poll said they couldn't go a single day without their mobile devices.[3] It has been reported in over 206 published survey findings that 27% of parents and 50% of teenagers believe they are addicted to their phones. [4] According to recent studies, there is a rise in dependence on mobile phones, which may lead to an increase in internet addiction.[5]

Targeting the lack of growth and unfair life period in youth, Afteensh Adolematurity uses his films for many purposes. They will experience everything, from the latest developments in mobile health to the use of mobile in advertising, directly on mobile. Nowadays, children under the age of 10 are attracted to mobile games, entertainment, cinema, etc. is interested. However, this may negatively affect both the youth and the child's physical and mental health.[6]

Connectivity has become more important than smartphones, with 53% of Americans using smartphones during an unprecedented time in public health history, according to information from the Pew Research Center. The use of mobile devices also enables children to participate in distance learning; nearly 29% of parents said their children should use a smartphone to complete their education. These include anxiety, depression, behavioural problems, and social problems. For example, a drug addict can easily become angry when he cannot place a bet. Smartphone addicts may feel anxious or irritable when they are away from their phones.[7]

Smartphone, although a computer, tablet, or smartphone can be an incredibly useful tool, excessive usage of these gadgets can negatively impact relationships, employment, and education. It might be time to reevaluate your use of technology if you find yourself spending more time on social media or playing games than you do interact with actual people or if you find yourself constantly checking your emails, texts, or apps even when doing so has detrimental effects on your life. [8]

Smartphones for Seniors Electronic devices have become popular,and smartphones are considered the most used electronic devices among young people, especially teenagers. Smartphone use is a major problem among young people. Phone addiction is a type of technology addiction. It is defined as a control disorder in which a person is under the influence of technology through excessive use of the internet, video games and mobile devices. [9]

Smartphones, particularly, aim Using a smartphone has become a necessity for daily living. Widespread smartphone use is linked to several conveniences, but for the past ten years, there have also been growing public health concerns about problematic smartphone use, or PSU. In particular, investigations on the developmental outcomes of children and adolescents have highlighted additional concerns because of the lack of evidence regarding the long-term effects of PSU. [10]

 

Materials and Methods

Research design- A descriptive research design was used in the study. A simple random technique was used to obtain 80 samples from the high school urban area of Bagalkot, India. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire to assess the addiction to smartphone and their health impacts among students. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.

 

Sources of Data- The present study data were collected from adolescents.

 

Descriptive survey approach- A descriptive survey approach is designed when the purpose of the study is to describe the prevalence or incidence of phenomena or to estimate the value of phenomena for a population. In the present study, the main aim is to assess the addiction to smartphone and their health impacts on students.

 

Research design- A descriptive study is research in which a one-time evaluation of students' knowledge regarding smartphone addiction is made. The research design defines the population, sample, size, variables, data collection tools and methods, and data analysis plan.

 

Variables- Dependent variable- In this study, the Smartphone addiction of students is the dependent variable. 

 

Independent variable- In this study, independent variables are the health impacts of students.

 

Socio-variables- It consists of 11 items: age, gender, education status, education status of mother, education status of father, monthly income, religion, occupation of father, do you have a Smartphone, and how many hours per day you use a Smartphone?

Population- PUC 1st and 2nd students at Murarji Desai Residential Science PU College, Bagalkot, India. 

Sample and sample technique- We chose 80 students and used stratified random sampling techniques conducted at Murarji Desai Residential Science PU College Bagalkot, India.

Data Collection Tool- Data collection tools are the procedures or instruments used by the researcher to observe or measure the key variable in the research problem. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect the data in the present study.

Procedure for data collection- Data collected from 13/03/2023 to 08/04/2023. Data collection was carried out in 3 phases: the first phase was data collection regarding socio-demographic factors and the Smartphone addiction of students. Second phase: data collection regarding Smartphone addiction according to the severity of the students. Third phase: data collection regarding the health impacts of students.

Data collected from all students based on their socio-demographic factors and measurements of height and weight by using instruments like a measuring scale for height and a weighing machine for weight determines the health impact of students.

 

Statistical Analysis- Data analysis is the systematic organization and synthesis of research data and the testing of research hypotheses by using the collected data. The data was analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistics. A chi-square test was used to find an association between the physical activity level and its relationship with body image among students.

 

Ethical Approval- Ethical approval was obtained from B.V.V.S. Institute of Nursing Sciences and Institutional Ethics Committee, Bagalkot. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

 

RESULT- Assessment of smartphone addiction and its health impacts on students- The range value is 0 15, the mean value is 9.46, the minimum value is 0, the maximum value is 15, the standard deviation is 0.48, and the mean percentage is 31.95%. The calculated chi-square value of 4.14 (p-value 0.04) suggests there is a significant association between Smartphone addiction and education among students. The calculated chi-square value of 4.13 (p-value 0.04) suggests there is a significant association between addiction to smartphones and their health impacts (burning sensation of the eyes) among students.

Among all samples, 11 (13.75%) students have mild addiction, 35 (43.75%) students have moderate addiction, and 34 (42.5%) students have severe addiction. So many students have had health impacts and need to avoid using smartphones for a long time, which helps improve their health (Table 1).

 

Table 1: Distribution and descriptions of socio-demographic variables

Variables

Categories

Frequency

Percentage (%)

 

Age

15-16 years

20

25

16 17 years

21

26.25

18 and above

39

48.75

 

Sex

Male

39

48

Female

41

51.25

 

Education status

1st year

37

46.25

2nd year

43

53.75

 

Education of the father

Primary

38

47.5

High school

24

30

PUC

04

05

Degree

14

17.5

Education of the mother

Primary

50

62.5

High school

22

27.5

PUC

05

06.25

Degree

03

3.75

Monthly Income

<10,000

42

51.21

10,000 to 20,000

15

18.75

>20,000

23

28.75

Religion

Hindu

65

81.25

Muslim

12

15

Christian

03

03.75

Occupation of the father

Government employee

12

15

 

Private employee

29

36.25

Business

25

31.25

Farmer

14

17.5

Occupation of the mother

Government employee

17

21.25

Private employee

11

13.75

Business

04

05

Housewife

48

60

 

Do you have a smartphone?

Yes

75

93.75

No

05

06.25

Do you use your smartphone for how many hours per day?

1 to 2 hours

14

17.5

3 to 4 hours

22

27.5

5 to 6 hours

44

55

 

Description of students based on their categories- Distribution of the sample according to age total of 80 students 20 (25%) were 15 16 years old, 21 (26.25%) were 16 17 years old, and 39 (48.75%) were 18 and above students. 39 (48%) were male, and 41 (51.25%) were female students. 37 (46.25%) were studying in the 1st year of PUC, and 43 (53.75%) were studying in the 2nd year of PUC. 38 (47.5%) were primary, 24 (30%) studied up to high school, 4 (05%) studied PUC, and 14 (17.5%) had education status up to a degree. Distribution of subjects according to the mother s education status 50 (62.5%) mothers had received only primary education, 22 (27.5%) mothers studied up to high school, 05 (06.25%) studied PUC, and 03 (03.75%) had education status up to degree.

Distribution of subjects according to their family's monthly income 42 (51.21%) had a family monthly income below Rs 10,000, 15 (18.75%) between Rs 10,000 and 20,000, and 23 (28.75%) had more than Rs 20,000 family monthly income. 65 (81.25%) students were from the Hindu population, 12 (15%) were from Muslim families, and 3 (03.75%) were from Christian families. 12 (15%) were government-employed, 29 (36.25%) were privately employed, 25 (31.25%) were doing business, and 14 (17.5%) were doing farming. Distribution of subjects according to the mother occupation: 17 (21.25%) were government-employed, 11 (13.75%) were privately employed, 04 (05%) were doing business, and 48 (60%) were staying at home as housewives.

Distribution of students according to who has a smartphone 75 (93.75%) had a Smartphone, while the remaining 05 (6.25%) did not. Distribution of the sample according to their time, hours, and days of Smartphone use 14 (17.5%) students used for 1 to 2 hours, 22 (27.5%) used for 3 to 4 hours, and 44 (55%) students were used for 5 to 6 hours (Table 2).

 

Table 2: Students according to mobile addiction and its severity

Level of mobile addiction

Frequency

Percentage (%)

Mild addiction

11

13.75

Moderate addiction

35

43.75

Severe addiction

34

42.5

According to the above table, out of 80 students, 13.75% have mild addiction, 43.75% have moderate addiction, and 42.5% have severe addiction (Table 3).

Table 3: Student's Mean, range, and standard deviation of smartphone addiction among students

Range

Mean

Minimum

Maximum

Standard deviation

Mean (%)

0-15

9.46

0

15

0.48

31.95

 

The above table assesses Smartphone addiction and its health impacts on students.  The range value is 20, the mean value is 9.46, the minimum value is 15, the maximum value is 30, the standard deviation is 0.48, and the mean percentage is 31.95% (Table 4).

 

Table 4: Chi-square test shows an association between smartphone addictions and socio-demographic variables

Socio-demographic variables

Chi-square value

p-value

Age

0.3

0.86*

Sex

0.45

0.50*

Education status

0.18

0.67*

Education of the father

3.86

0.04**

Education of the mother

4.14

0.04**

Monthly income

0.4

0.52*

Religion

0.24

0.63*

Occupation of the father

0.02

0.88*

Occupation of the mother

0.91

0.34*

Do you have a Smartphone?

0.9

0.76*

Do you use a Smartphone for how many hours per day?

0.02

0.88*

p<0.05; α =0.05; *All the values are statistically non-significant; **All the values are statistically significant

 

Assessing the addiction to smartphone and their health impacts among students- The calculated chi-square value is 3.86 (p-value 0.04), indicating that there is a significant relationship between mobile phone use and the education level of the student's father. The calculated chi-square value is 4.14 (p-value 0.04), which shows that there is a significant relationship between students' mobile phone use and parents' education (Table 5).

 

Table 5: Distribution of students according to their health impact

Items

Frequency

Percentage (%)

Blurred vision

 

Blurred vision

 

49

61.25

Water eyes

30

37.5

Dryness in the eyes

45

56.25

Burning sensation in the eyes

40

50

Eye pain

 

45

56.25

Neck pain

 

43

53.75

Irritation

 

55

68.75

Restlessness

 

45

56.25

Stress

 

30

37.5

Aggressiveness

45

56.25

 

Assessing the addiction to smartphone and their health impacts among students- The calculated chi-square value of 4.13 (p-value 0.04) suggests there is a significant association between the addiction to smartphone and their health impacts (burning sensation of the eyes) among students (Table 6).

 

Table 6: Chi-Square test showing assessment of smartphone addiction and its health impacts

Items

Chi-square Value

p<0.05

Blurred vision

 

1.55

0.21*

Water eyes

 

0.12

0.72*

Dryness in the eyes

 

0.22

0.63*

Burning sensation in the eyes

4.13

0.04**

Eye pain

 

1.88

0.17*

Neck pain

 

0.68

0.40*

Irritation

 

0.02

0.88*

Restlessness

 

0.03

0.86*

Stress

 

0.06

0.80*

Aggressiveness

0.04

0.84*

DF= 1; α=0.05; *All the values are statistically non-significant

**All the values are statistically significant

 

DISCUSSION- To assess the addiction to smartphones and their health impacts among students, a cross-sectional descriptive design was used. The study was conducted at Murarji Desai Residential Science PU College Bagalkote Sector (44 Opposite). The study found a positive difference between misbehaviour and poor academic performance based on the total PUMP score, which could be attributed to smartphone use. Due to smartphone use, at least 43% of respondents felt they slept less and had less energy since they started using smartphones.[11] The current study shows that only 16% of the participants are not addicted to their mobile phones, 28% are minor, 35% are moderate, and 21% are heavily addicted. Of the participants. Similar results were obtained in a study where researchers examined cell phone usage patterns; 58% of the sample reported not going a day without their phone. [12]

This study examined smartphone use among young adults and found four key findings. First of all, the German version of SASSV may be a suitable mechanism to measure smartphone protection. Second, long-term smartphone use is associated with addiction. Third, users who pick up their smartphones early in the morning are more likely to become addicted. Finally, users' social media addiction is the strongest indicator of smartphone use. [13]

The research found that smartphone protection is more common among young adults and parents born outside Switzerland; this suggests that prevention plans should be considered, especially for this group of young people. [14] A total of 540 participants were included in this study for analysis, and the last ten questions were selected based on their validity as determined by experts. The validity and effectiveness of these 10 questions were evaluated with internal reliability, concurrent validity, and ROC analysis. [15]

Research shows that young people who experience parental neglect have problems controlling their smartphone use. According to stress theory, our findings are consistent with previous research suggesting that adolescents engage in antisocial behaviour to avoid or reduce stress or stress resulting from parental neglect. Smartphone addiction can be considered a crime. [16]

This study concluded that mobile phone use is associated with young age and poor development and that recommending good internet use may be a protective factor. Early intervention through early detection can prevent problems related to smartphone use among children and adolescents. We hope that future research will focus on increasing the number of observers and validating the results with findings and conclusions. [17]

CONCLUSIONSIn this longitudinal study, overuse of Smartphones was observed for health impact. The results showed that most of the students had eye health impacts, and many students were at risk of health impacts from overuse of Smartphones. They need to improve their health, provide awareness, and avoid excessive use of Smartphones. Students had the same health impacts, like blurred vision, watery eyes, and eye pain. The study shows most students overuse Smartphones by giving health education, providing health tips on how to maintain good health, raising awareness regarding health impacts, explaining the importance and limited use of Smartphones, and explaining healthy lifestyles.

Acknowledgement- We thank the anonymous referees for their useful suggestions. The heart is full, and words are few to express my sincere gratitude towards those helping hands.    

CONTRIBUTION OF AUTHORS

Research concept: Jayashree Itti

Research design: Lakshmavva Gondi

Supervision: Lakshmavva Gondi

Materials: Lakshmavva Gondi, Jayashree Itti

Data Collection: Lakshmavva Gondi, Jayashree Itti

Analysis and interpretation of data: Lakshmavva Gondi, Jayashree Itti

Data analysis: Lakshmavva Gondi, Jayashree Itti

Writing of the article: Lakshmavva Gondi, Jayashree Itti

Critical review:  Lakshmanva Gondi

Article editing:  Lakshmavva Gondi

REFERENCES

1.     Meet Marty Cooper The Inventor of the Mobile Phone. [Last accessed on 2016 Nov 02]. Available from: http://www.news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/click_online/8639590.stm.

2.     ICT Facts and Figures-The World in 2015. [Last accessed on 2016 Nov 02]. Available from: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/ICTFactsFigures2015.pdf.

3.     Duerson MH. We're Addicted to our Phones: 84% Worldwide say they couldn't go a Single day without their Mobile Device in their Hand. New York Daily News. [Last accessed on 2016 Nov 05]. Available from: http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/addicted-phones-84-worldwide-couldn-single-daymobiledevice-hand-article-1.1137811.

4.     Wallace K. Half of Teens Think they're Addicted to their Smartphones. [Last accessed on 2016 Nov 05]. Available from: http://www.edition.cnn.com/2016/05/03/health/teens-cell-phone-addiction-parents/.

5.     Billieux JL, van der Linden M, Rochat L. The role of impulsivity in actual and problematic use of the mobile phone. Appl Cogn Psychol., 2008; 22: 1195 210.

6.     Gracy GS. A Descriptive Study to Assess the Relationship between Mobile Phone Addiction and Risk Taking Behviour among Adolescents in Selected Schools at Bharuch. Int J Sci Res., 2018: 8(3): 1672-75.

7.     Prime Insights. Smartphone Addiction: How technology affects public health and social relationships. Available at: https://primeinsights.in/smartphone-addiction/, 2015.

8.     Panwar P, Pushpa, Raksha Y. Smartphone addiction and its health impacts among b.sc. (hons) Nursing students. Int J Adv Res., 2022; 10(08): 103-09.

9.     Balan R, Soon S, Bikar S, Azizi Y, et al. Smartphone Addiction and Sleep Quality on Academic Performance of University Students. J Environ Res Public Health, 2021; 18(16): 8291. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168291.

10.  Seung YL, Hae KL, Jung SC, et al. The Matthew Effect in Recovery from Smartphone Addiction in a 6-Month Longitudinal Study of Children and Adolescents. J Environ Res Public Health, 202017(13): 4751.  doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134751.

11.  Hatem MDA, Alyahya MDH, Shaik S, et al. Smartphone addiction among university students in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J., 2016; 37(6): 675 83.

12.  Nehal B, Muninarayanappa NV, Nageshwar V. Mobile Phone Dependence Level and Sleep Quality among Students of Selected Colleges of Moradabad. Indian J Public Health Res Dev., 2017; 8(1): 41-45.

13.  Severin H, Raquel PC, Min K, Andreas F, Tobias K, et al. Smartphone use and smartphone addiction among young people in Switzerland. J Behav Addictions, 2015; 4(4): 299 307. doi: 10.1556/2006.4.2015.037.

14.  Haug S, Paz CR, Kwon M, et al. Smartphone use and smartphone addiction among young people in Switzerland. J Behav Addictions, 2015; 4(4): 299 307. doi: 10.1556/2006.4.2015.037.

15.  Kwon M, Kim DJ, Cho H, et al. The Smartphone Addiction Scale: Development and Validation of a Short Version for Adolescents. PLOS One, 2013; 8(12): e83558.

16.  Kwak JY, Kim JY, Won YY. Effect of parental neglect on smartphone addiction in adolescents in South Korea. Child Abuse Neglect., 2018; 77: 75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.12.008.

17.  Tateno M, Kim AR, Toe E, et al. Smartphone Addiction in Japanese College Students: Usefulness of the Japanese Version of the Smartphone Addiction Scale as a Screening Tool for a New Form of Internet Addiction. Psychiatry Investig., 2019; 16(2): 115 20. doi: 30773/pi.2018.12.25.2.