Research Article (Open access) |
---|
SSR Inst. Int. J. Life Sci., 9(5): 3299-3306, September
2023
Effect of Combined Treatment of Massage, Exercise and KIASTM
with That of Only Exercise in Patients with Diastasis Recti
Pooja Pandey Tripathi*
Department of Physiotherapy, RGUHS University,
Bangalore, India
*Address for Correspondence: Dr. Pooja
Pandey Tripathi, Department of Physiotherapy, RGUHS University, Bangalore, India
E-mail: drpoojapandey@gmail.com
ABSTRACT Background: Diastasis
rectus abdominis (DRA) is a common problem in pregnant and post-partum women
caused by hormonal stress. It affects pelvic stability and posture.
Non-surgical interventions like abdominal exercises, mild aerobic exercises,
and the Cyriax1 cross-friction massage technique improve muscle strength,
reduce back pain, and decrease abdominal separation. Kinesio Instrument
Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (KIASTM) can also help reduce pain and
improve compliance. To analyze the efficacy of Kinesio Instrument Assisted Soft
Tissue Mobilization as a part of physiotherapy in patients with diastasis
recti.
Methods:
A retrospective study analyzed patient data from November 2022 to April 2023,
focusing on diastasis recti. Initial measurements and assessments were
conducted on two groups: Study group (n=41) received massage, exercises, and
Kinesio Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (KIASTM), while the
Control group (n=39) received exercise and massage only. Measurements were
taken before and after treatment, and the significance of KIASTM was
statistically analyzed. Patients with chronic systemic conditions were
excluded.
Results:
The study showed significant differences (p<0.05) between the two groups in
most parameters assessed, except for "Finger Measurements Vertical
(Before)" and "Inch measurements before treatment (above
umbilicus)" (p>0.05). Parameters like "Finger Measurements
Vertical (After),""Inch measurements before and after
treatment", "Days of treatment," and "Depth before (in
cm)" showed significant differences (p<0.05) between the two groups.
Conclusion: The
study has concluded that KIASTM significantly reduces the diastasis recti and
achieves other desirable outcomes.
Keywords: Massage, Diastasis Recti, Rectus
abdominis, Physiotherapy, Soft Tissue Mobilization
INTRODUCTION- Diastasis rectus abdominis (DRA) is a common health problem
in both post-partum and pregnant women [1,2]. Determination of DRA
is accomplished by using a separation criterion of more than 2 cm at points of
linea alba [2-4]. DRA is frequent and negatively affects women's
health during pregnancy and after [5,6]. It develops during the
second trimester. 66% to 100% experience DRA in their third trimester, and 53%
suffer just after giving birth [7-10]. Hormones, including relaxin,
progesterone, and estrogen, exert mechanical stress over the abdominal wall
during gestation. Displacement in abdominal organs causes elastic changes in
connective tissue, ultimately causing DRA [11,12]. Multiple
pregnancies, polyhydramnios, flaccid abdominal muscles, microsomia and obesity
are some predisposing factors [13-17]. These changes affect the
stretches and lengthen the rectus abdominis of women during [2,3,18].
Ultimately, functional strength and mechanical control of the abdominal wall
decreases, resulting in diastasis recti [10,19]. DR cause impaired
pelvic stability and alteration in posture, making the pelvis and lumbar spine
vulnerable to injury [20-22]. It can also result in defecting trunk
side bending, rotation, parturition, elimination, and respiration [21,23].
Moreover, DR may cause post-partum women severe health complications in the
lower back and cosmetic defects [24,25]. These women suffer acute
pain in the abdomen and pelvic region. In several cases, DR is unresolved but
can last for many years [26].
Abdominal
and aerobic exercises can be preferred as non-surgical interventions for
treating women with DRA [27-29]. The change in the muscles after
exercising strengthens its contractile tissue. Therapeutic exercises lead to
the activation of Slow Twitch (ST) as well as Fast Twitch (FT) fibres in
skeletal muscles, thereby improving muscular strength [30]. A core
exercising routine can be proven helpful in treating DRA as it reduces back
pain [31,32]. Strengthening the lower abdomen's core muscles helps
develop a muscular corset in the postnatal period. This periodic physical
movement alleviates muscle toning, reducing abdominal separation [33].
Moreover, therapeutic exercises help in reducing DRA by 2 cm because of routine
stabilization exercises and abdominal bracing [34,35].
The Cyriax1
cross-friction massage is the ancestor of instrument-assisted soft tissue
mobilization (KIASTM), which uses hard tools to manipulate soft tissue [36].
It has recently gained popularity as an alternative to conventional manual
therapy methods. The same studies that revealed KIASTM improves the healing
process through enhanced fibroblast proliferation [3,14] and higher
collagen synthesis, maturation, and alignment apply to all of these techniques
and businesses, as well as others [35,36], despite instrument and
protocol variations. KIASTM may be therapeutically beneficial in treating
non-specific thoracic discomfort in adults and groups with tendinopathy.
Furthermore, pain negatively impacts patient compliance; as a result, using
KIASTM to reduce pain may increase treatment compliance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS Research Design- The study was conducted
retrospectively by extracting the data of the patients who visited the author
from November 2022 to April 2023. The details of the patients were considered.
At initial visit before the treatment was started, the patients underwent
series of measurements including horizontal and vertical finger measurements of
the diastasis recti, measurement of the same in inches, depth of the diastasis
recti and presence of hernia. The patients were randomized into either of 2
groups the Study group (n=41) or Control group (n=39). The Study group received
massage, scheduled exercises and KIASTM.
Interventions-
Core
activation exercises, abdominal and diaphragmatic breathing exercises were
given. But the patients were never given back extension exercises and were told
not to bend forwards (bend your knees and go down). The patients were
given massage, including abdominal massage and taping, in case of a few cases
or asked to wear an umbilical belt during treatment. KIASTM is a manual therapy
technique that utilizes specially designed instruments to mobilize soft tissue.
The treatment is usually administered by a trained healthcare professional,
such as a physical therapist, chiropractor, or sports medicine physician.
During the treatment, the practitioner uses the instruments to apply pressure
and scrape the skin in a specific pattern over the affected area. This helps to
break up scar tissue and adhesions, increase blood flow, and improve range of
motion. The treatment is typically performed for 5-10 minutes, with multiple
sessions often required for optimal results. The exact technique and duration of
treatment may vary depending on the patient's condition and the practitioner's
assessment. The Control group received only exercise and massage. Each patient
received treatment based on the severity and requirement. The measurements
which were conducted before the treatments, were also being determined after
the treatment in both groups. The measurements were statistically analyzed to
find out the significance of KIASTM.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria- The diastasis recti patients who
visited the author's clinic were only included in this study. The patients who
continued and followed-up with the treatment had shared all the required
information that were only included. The patients with underlying chronic
systemic conditions did not continue or visit the author for follow-up
measurements, did not share all the required information, were excluded from
the study.
Statistical Analysis- The study used SPSS 25 for effective
analysis. The continuous data were expressed as mean standard deviation, while the discrete
data were expressed as frequency and its respective percentage. The study
employed one-way ANOVA as a statistical tool for analyzing the measurements
between the two groups. The level of significance considered was p<0.05.
Ethical Approval- The author obtained consent from all
the patients during their treatment schedules. The study used the patients'
data, maintaining the privacy of the patient's details.
RESULTS- Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of patients in
the study group (n=41) and control group (n=39). The characteristics include
age, BMI, baby weight, twin delivery, education level, ability to lift heavy,
Beighton test results for hypermobility, physical activity level, and type of
delivery. The mean age was similar between the groups, and both groups had a
similar distribution of Education, Physical Activity, and kind of delivery. The
study group had a slightly higher BMI and a higher percentage of hypermobility
and ability to lift heavy compared to the control group.
Table 1: Baseline characteristics of the
patients in each group
Characteristic |
Study Group N = 41 |
Control Group N = 39 |
Age |
38.39 6.26 |
37.87 4.38 |
BMI |
25.62 3.2 |
25.12 3.6 |
Weight
of the baby |
2.9 0.4 |
2.8 0.5 |
Twin
Delivery, n (%) |
1
(2.43) |
0 |
Education |
|
|
Higher
Education and below, n (%) |
4
(9.75) |
5
(12.8) |
Graduate
and above, n (%) |
37
(90.24) |
34
(87.17) |
Ability
to lift heavy |
||
Yes,
n (%) |
15
(36.58) |
12
(30.76) |
No,
n (%) |
26
(63.41) |
27
(69.23) |
Beighton
Test (Hypermobility) |
||
Not
hypermobile, n (%) |
8
(19.51) |
9
(23.08) |
Hypermobility,
n (%) |
33
(80.49) |
30
(76.92) |
Physical
Activity (≥ 30 minutes) |
||
Regular,
n (%) |
4
(9.76) |
3
(7.69) |
Irregular,
n (%) |
16
(39.02) |
14
(35.9) |
No
activity, n (%) |
21(51.22) |
22
(56.41) |
Type
of Delivery |
||
Vaginal,
n (%) |
7
(17.07) |
5
(12.82) |
Cesarean,
n (%) |
34
(82.93) |
34
(87.18) |
Table 2 displays the pre-treatment measures of the study
group, revealing that their finger and inch measurements were comparatively
smaller than those of the control group. Following the intervention, there was
a notable decrease in the measurements of the study group. Again, the control
group exhibited an increase in their respective values. The study group
exhibited a shorter treatment time, decreased depths before and during
treatment and marginally less severe hernia severity than the control group.
Table 2: Mean values of each parameter of
the patients in both the groups
Parameter |
Study Group |
Control Group |
Finger
Measurements Horizontal (Before) |
5.26 1.88 |
8.54 2.39 |
Finger
Measurements Vertical (Before) |
8.83 2.26 |
8.87 1.47 |
Finger
Measurements Horizontal (After) |
1.67 1.08 |
1.5 0.79 |
Finger
Measurements Vertical (After) |
2.1 0.86 |
3.97 0.84 |
Inch
measurements before treatment (at umbilicus) |
36.93 4.01 |
38.66 2.39 |
Inch
measurements before treatment (above the umbilicus) |
35.99 4.21 |
36.75 2.61 |
Inch
measurements before treatment (below the umbilicus) |
38.32 4.22 |
40.8 2.37 |
Inch
measurements after treatment (at umbilicus) |
33.63 3.65 |
37.29 2.44 |
Inch
measurements after treatment (above the umbilicus) |
33.09 3.52 |
35.41 2.59 |
Inch
measurements after treatment (below umbilicus) |
35.05 3.99 |
39.53 2.35 |
Days
of treatment |
7.73 2.25 |
13.74 4.15 |
Depth
before (cm) |
6.55 2.03 |
8.15 1.99 |
Depth
after (cm) |
2.01 0.8 |
6.3 1.58 |
Hernia |
1.88 0.33 |
1.97 0.16 |
Table 3 displays
the results of a significance test conducted on various parameters between two
groups. The study also found that there is a significant difference (p<0.05)
between the two groups in most of the parameters assessed, except for the
"Finger Measurements Vertical (Before)" and "Inch measurements
before treatment (above the umbilicus)" (p>0.05). Again, the study
found that parameters like "Finger Measurements Vertical (After), Inch
measurements before treatment (at umbilicus), Inch measurements before treatment
(below umbilicus), Inch measurements after treatment (at umbilicus), Inch
measurements after treatment (above umbilicus), Inch measurements after
treatment (below umbilicus), Days of treatment," and "Depth before
(in cm)" have significant differences between the two groups (p<0.05).
Therefore,
the study assessed that there is a significant difference between the two
groups for most of the parameters assessed, except for "Finger
Measurements Vertical (Before)" and "Inch measurements before
treatment (above the umbilicus)."
Table 3: Significance Test findings of each
parameter assessed between the two groups
|
Sum of Squares |
df |
Mean Square |
F-value |
p-value |
|
Finger
Measurements Vertical (Before) |
Between Groups |
0.03 |
1 |
0.03 |
0.01 |
0.921 |
Within Groups |
286.16 |
78 |
3.66 |
|
|
|
Total |
286.20 |
79 |
|
|
|
|
Finger
Measurements Vertical (After) |
Between Groups |
70.40 |
1 |
70.40 |
97.05 |
<.001 |
Within Groups |
56.58 |
78 |
0.72 |
|
|
|
Total |
126.98 |
79 |
|
|
|
|
Inch
measurements before treatment (at umbilicus) |
Between Groups |
67.32 |
1 |
67.32 |
6.19 |
0.01 |
Within Groups |
869.93 |
80 |
10.87 |
|
|
|
Total |
937.26 |
81 |
|
|
|
|
Inch
measurements before treatment (above the umbilicus) |
Between Groups |
10.90 |
1 |
10.90 |
0.90 |
0.34 |
Within Groups |
968.28 |
80 |
12.10 |
|
|
|
Total |
979.18 |
81 |
|
|
|
|
Inch
measurements before treatment (below the umbilicus) |
Between Groups |
125.14 |
1 |
125.14 |
10.74 |
0.002 |
Within Groups |
931.48 |
80 |
11.64 |
|
|
|
Total |
1056.62 |
81 |
|
|
|
|
Inch
measurements after treatment (at umbilicus) |
Between Groups |
285.17 |
1 |
285.17 |
29.74 |
<.001 |
Within Groups |
766.93 |
80 |
9.58 |
|
|
|
Total |
1052.11 |
81 |
|
|
|
|
Inch
measurements after treatment (above the umbilicus) |
Between Groups |
108.44 |
1 |
108.44 |
11.55 |
0.001 |
Within Groups |
750.60 |
80 |
9.38 |
|
|
|
Total |
859.05 |
81 |
|
|
|
|
Inch
measurements after treatment (below the umbilicus) |
Between Groups |
407.86 |
1 |
407.86 |
38.36 |
<.001 |
Within Groups |
850.50 |
80 |
10.63 |
|
|
|
Total |
1258.37 |
81 |
|
|
|
|
Days
of treatment |
Between Groups |
772.63 |
1 |
772.63 |
69.23 |
<.001 |
Within Groups |
881.58 |
79 |
11.15 |
|
|
|
Total |
1654.22 |
80 |
|
|
|
|
Depth
before (cm) |
Between Groups |
60.26 |
1 |
60.26 |
14.46 |
<.001 |
Within Groups |
333.41 |
80 |
4.16 |
|
|
|
Total |
393.68 |
81 |
|
|
<.001 |
|
Depth
after (cm) |
Between Groups |
398.42 |
1 |
398.42 |
228.62 |
|
Within Groups |
139.41 |
80 |
1.74 |
|
|
|
Total |
537.83 |
81 |
|
|
|
DISCUSSION- One of the frequent problems experienced by post-partum women
is DRA. DRA can be challenging to treat. Due to the past lack of knowledge
about this condition, many patients could not receive prompt and efficient
diagnosis and treatment, which caused the parturients' DRA symptoms to worsen
continuously and impacted their quality of life [37-40]. The
occurrence and progressive aggravation of complications and the requirement for
surgical treatment can be prevented by early diagnosis and detection of DRA. In
China, medical clinics are frequently the initial contact points for diagnosing
and caring for DRA in post-partum women.
Because of
its early symptoms' mildness, maternal post-partum DRA received less attention
in the past. Yet, as more research and studies have been conducted, more
excellent knowledge of DRA has emerged. One of the frequent issues during
pregnancy and the post-partum period is DRA [37,38]. It may start
around week 14 of pregnancy and worsen during the next few weeks until birth.
Although the illness has grown apparent, there is still debate on DRA diagnosis
and course of action [39,40]. Long-term post-partum DRA may result
in health issues, such as enduring low back pain and abdominal and pelvic
discomfort. This has been clearly shown in prior investigations. In the first
six months after giving birth, 40% of women statistically report having ongoing
pelvic and lower back pain [31,32]. DRA is not a health issue that
can be resolved for many post-partum women and may worsen over time. The
symptoms of DRA and whether they may be treated directly or indirectly
determine whether to intervene or provide treatment. According to the study's
findings, the DRA separation was greatly enhanced and mended above the
umbilicus' centre and below its 4.5 cm border, not just partially recovered.
The key to
treating DRA separation early on and normalizing it is relieving patient
symptoms. Another efficient option to treat DRA is by non-surgical treatment
and early active intervention techniques [29]. At the same time,
corsets, acupuncture treatment, pelvic floor muscle exercise, posture and back
care, frequent abdominal workouts, and other non-surgical procedures have all
been suggested as effective non-surgical interventions for DRA treatment.
Exercise can
significantly reduce DRA symptoms and is a successful non-surgical treatment,
according to a prior study that showed the effectiveness of abdominal exercises
with bracing in lowering DRA in the early post-partum period. This suggests
that workouts may be pretty useful in the early post-natal period, suggesting a
non-surgical treatment option for DRA [33].
For a
resistant and bulging abdominal wall, static abdominal contractions, pelvic
rocking, sit-ups, and leg slides are also advised [39]. According
to some reports, the ribs, linea alba, and thoracolumbar fascia can all be
stabilized by bilateral activation of the transversus abdominis. The gap at the
linea alba is closed by contracting the transversus abdominis, shortening the
rectus abdominis muscles. Also, it has been demonstrated that therapeutic
activities effectively treat several particular disorders in women. According
to a recent study, closed kinetic chain workouts in postmenopausal women with
osteoporosis significantly improved bone mineral density and decreased fall
risk. Based on this information, therapeutic exercises, such as ones that enhance
core stability, may be helpful for DRA patients [40].
CONCLUSIONS- The study has concluded that KIASTM significantly reduces
the diastasis recti and achieves other desirable outcomes. The variables
measured in this study showed KIASTM, if applied with massage and exercise, can
bring significant positive results within less time. The study, however, is
single-centred, and findings cannot be considered conclusive. The author
suggests conducting similar studies in other settings and centres to bring out
the findings from varied populations. Overall, this study has highlighted an
essential point of physiotherapy dealing with diastasis recti patients, which
is quite common in lactating mothers.
The study
further highlighted that the group receiving KIASTM needed fewer days to
achieve the desired goal.
CONTRIBUTION OF AUTHORS
One author is only contributed to this article.
REFERENCES
1.
Chiarello CM, Falzone LA, McCaslin KE, Patel MN, et al. The
effects of an exercise program on diastasis recti abdominis in pregnant women.
J Womens Health Phys Therap., 2005; 29(1): 11-16.
2.
Gruszczyńska D,
Dąbek A, Rekowski W. Diastasis recti abdominis-what may cause it in
postpartum women?. Postepy Rehabilitacji, 2021; 35(2): 24.
3.
Alamer A, Kahsay G,
Ravichandran H. Prevalence of diastasis recti and associated factors among
women attending antenatal and postnatal careatmekelle city health facilities,
tigray, Ethiopia. Age, 2019; 20, pp.37.
4.
Manik RK, Dubey S, Joshi
A. The Effect of Possible Yogic Practices in Management of Pregnancy Induced
Hypertension. J Surv Fish Sci., 2023; 10(1S): 4237-46.
5.
Rett MT, Almeida TV. Factors relating to mother and child
associated with separation of the rectus abdominis muscle in immediate
puerperium. Rev Bras Sa de Matern Infant Recif., 2014; 14(1): 73-80.
6.
Rett MT, Braga MD, Bernardes NO, Andrade SC. Prevalence of
diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles immediately post-partum: comparison
between primiparae and multiparae. Rev Bras Fisioter., 2009; 13(4): 275-80.
7. Hafeez S, Baig TI, Ali
M, Hafeez H, et al. Prevalence of Diastasis Recti Abdominis in Females with
Respect to Their Stage and Status of Pregnancy. Pak J Med Health Sci., 2022;
16(05): 1498-98.
8.
Benjamin DR, van de Water AT, Peiris CL. Effects of exercise
on diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscle in the antenatal and postnatal
periods: a systematic review. Physiotherapy., 2014; 100(1): 1-8.
9. Yuan S, Li Y, Li Q, Fan
L, Zhou J. Surgery versus non-surgery interventions on rectus abdominis
diastasis with or without hernias: a systematic review. Ind J Surg., 2021; pp:
1-14.
10. Candido G, Lo T, Janssen P. Risk
factors for diastasis of the recti abdominis. J Assoc Chart Physiother Womens
Health, 2005; 97(2): 49-54.
11. Korra MC, Korra MD. Puerperio.
Obstetrics Obstetric Practice, 12a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Medici; 1999; 65(4):
1-12.
12. Lopes
LC, Lopes RUI. Application of point of care ultrasound and relevance of anatomy
in necrotizing fasciitis. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Pl stica, 2022; 37:
76-79.
13. Thabet
AA, Alshehri MA. Efficacy of deep core stability exercise program in
post-partum women with diastasis recti abdominis: a randomised controlled
trial. J Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions, 2019; 19(1): 62.
14. Stephenson RG, O'connor LJ. Obstetric
and gynecologic care in physical therapy, 2nd Ed. New York: Slack incorporated
press., 2000; 24(7): 1-10.
15. Mesquita LA, Machado AV, Andrade AV.
Fisioterapia para redu o da di stase dos m sculos retos abdominais no
p s-parto. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet., 1999; 42(6): 11-20.
16. Mota P, Pascoal AG, Sancho F, Bo K.
Test-retest and intrarater reliability of 2-dimensional ultrasound measurements
of distance between rectus abdominis in women. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.,
2012; 42(11): 940-46.
17. Tupler J, Gould J. Lose your mummy
tummy. Cambridge: Da Capo Press, 2005; 40(4): 21-34.
18. Lee DG, Lee LJ, McLaughlin L.
Stability, continence and breathing: the role of fascia following pregnancy and
delivery. J Bodywork Move Ther., 2008; 12(4): 333-48.
19. Spitznagle TM, Leong FC, Van Dillen
LR Prevalence of diastasis recti abdominis in a urogynecological patient
population. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct., 2007; 18(3): 321-28.
20. Acharry N, Kutty RK. Abdominal
exercise with bracing, a therapeutic efficacy in reducing diastasis-recti among
postpartal females. Int J Physiother Res., 2015; 3(2): 999-1005.
21. Aguirre DA, Santosa AC, Casola G,
Sirlin CB. Abdominal wall hernias: imaging features, complication, and
diagnostic pitfalls at multi-detector row CT. Radiographics., 2005; 25(6):
1501-20.
22. Caldeira A, Lott M,
Duran C, Holgu n JC. Other trends in abdominoplasty: new design and importance
of lipo-mid-abdominoplasty in body contour surgery. Revista Brasileira de
Cirurgia Pl stica, 2023; 35: 60-71.
23. Parker M, Millar L, Dugan S.
Diastasis rectus abdominis and lumbo-pelvic pain and dysfunction - Are they
related? J Womens Health Phys Therap., 2009; 33(2): 15-22.
24. Hall
H, Sanjaghsaz H. Diastasis Recti Rehabilitation. 2021; In: StatPearls
[Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan. 2023 Aug 8.
available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34424636/.
25. Opala-Berdzik A, Dabrowski S.
Physiotherapy in diastasis of the rectus muscles of abdomen in women during
pregnancy and post-partum. Fizjoterapia, 2009; 17(4): 67-70.
26. Keeler J, Albrecht M, Eberhardt L,
Horn L, Donnelly C, et al. Diastasis recti abdominis: a survey of women's
health specialists for current physical therapy clinical practice for
post-partum women. J Womens Health Phys Therap., 2012; 36(3): 131-42.
27. Jessen ML, berg S,
Rosenberg J. Treatment options for abdominal rectus diastasis. Front surg.,
2019; 6: 65.
28. Snijders T, Verdijk LB, Beelen M,
McKay BR, Parise G, et al. A single bout of exercise activates skeletal muscle
satellite cells during subsequent overnight recovery. Exp Physiol., 2012;
97(6): 762-73.
29. Walton L, Costa A, LaVanture D,
McIlrath S, Stebbins B. The effects of a 6 week dynamic core stability plank
exercise program compared to a traditional supine core stability strengthening
program on diastasis recti abdominis closure, pain, oswestry disability index
(ODI) and pelvic floor disability index scores (PFDI). Phy Ther Rehab., 2016;
3(1): 3-8.
30. Rathi M. Effect of pelvic floor
muscle strengthening exercises in chronic low back pain. IJPOT, 2013; 7(1):
121-25.
31. El-Mekawy H, Eldeeb A, El- Lythy M,
El-Begawy A. Effect of Abdominal Exercises versus Abdominal Supporting Belt on
Post-Partum Abdominal Efficiency and Rectus Separation. Int J Med Health Sci.,
2013; 7(1): 75-79.
32. Litos K. Progressive Therapeutic
Exercise Program for Successful Treatment of a Post-partum Woman With a Severe
Diastasis Recti Abdominis. J Womens Health Phys Therap., 2014; 38(2): 58-73.
33. Okike
K, Phillips DP, Swart E, O Connor MI. Orthopaedic faculty and resident sex
diversity are associated with the orthopaedic residency application rate of
female medical students. JBJS, 2019; 101(12): e56.
34. Hammer
WI. The effect of mechanical load on degenerated soft tissue. J Bodyw
Mov Ther., 2008; 12(3): 246 56.
35. Keshwani N, Mathur S, McLean L. The
impact of exercise therapy and abdominal binding in the management of diastasis
recti abdominis in the early post-partum period: a pilot randomized controlled
trial. Physiother Theory Pract., 2021; 37(9): 1018-33.
36. Malcher F, Lima DL, Lima R,
et al. Endoscopic onlay repair for ventral hernia and rectus abdominis
diastasis repair: why so many different names for the same procedure? A
qualitative systematic review. Surg Endosc., 2021; 35(10): 5414-21.
37. Sperstad JB, Tennfjord MK, Hilde G, et
al. Diastasis recti abdominis during pregnancy and 12 months after
childbirth: prevalence, risk factors and report of lumbopelvic pain. Br J
Sports Med., 2016; 50(17): 1092-96.
38. van de
Water AT, Benjamin DR. Measurement methods to assess
diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscle (DRAM): a systematic review of their
measurement properties and meta-analytic reliability generalization. Man
Ther., 2016; 21(4): 41-53.
39. Parker MA, Millar LA, Dugan SA. Diastasis
rectus abdominis and lumbo-pelvic pain and dysfunction-Are they
related?. J Women's Health Phy Ther., 2009; 33(2): 15-22.
40. Carlstedt
A, Bringman S, Egberth M, Emanuelsson P, Olsson A, et al. Management of
diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles: recommendations for Swedish national
guidelines. Scandinavian J Surg., 2021; 110(3): 452-59. doi:
10.1177/1457496920961000.