Research Article (Open access) |
---|
SSR Inst. Int. J. Life Sci., 8(6):
3113-3118,
Nov 2022
Anti-biofilm
Activity of Monolaurin on Staphylococcus aureus: An in-silico
Study
D. Srinivas Rao1,
Rabiathul Shameerasm 2,
KL Prathusha3, Mahendra Kumar Verma4, Rekha A5,
M. V. Raghavendra Rao5*
1Assistant
Professor, Department of Biotechnology, Acharya Nagarjuna University, Guntur
Andhra
Pradesh, India
2Department
of Biotechnology, B.S. Abdur Crescent Institute of Science and Technology, Vandalur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
3SIBAR
Institute of Dental Sciences, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
4Assistant
Professor, Basic and Pre-Medical Sciences, American University School of
Medicine, Aruba
5Professor
of Surgery and Dean, Apollo Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Hyderabad,
TS, India
6Scientist Emeritus and Director of Central Research
Laboratory, Apollo Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Hyderabad,
Telangana, India
*Address for
Correspondence: Dr. M. V. Raghavendra Rao, Scientist Emeritus and Director of Central
Research Laboratory, Apollo Institute of Medical Sciences and Research,
Hyderabad, Telangana, India
E-mail: reachdrmvrrao@gmail.com
Methods: Using the AutoDock programme,
a docking study of monolaurin against Clf A (clumping
factor A) was carried out, and Pymol software was
used to evaluate the generated hydrogen bonds in the docked complex. This study
demonstrates the positive potential of monolaurin as an antibacterial product
and lends support to upcoming pharmacological research on this molecule with an
eye toward its therapeutic use.
Results: Research was done to support the theoretical absorption of monolaurin in this work and in silico. It was feasible to forecast if the monolaurin molecule may be produced as a medication based on the values of the physical-chemical parameters evaluated using the online tool Swiss ADME.
Conclusion: The
compound monolaurin demonstrated good receptor ClfA
binding affinity with an estimated binding energy of kcal/mol. Natural
anti-staphylococcal chemical monolaurin was used as a possible medicine for
treating staphylococcal infections in humans by carrying out drug design
studies for S. aureus.
Key Words: Biofilm, Binding energy, Infection and Immunity, Ligand and
Docking, Monolaurin
INTRODUCTION- Staphylococcus aureus has a
high prevalence of morbidity and mortality, which results in a wide range of
infections and considerable costs for healthcare systems [1]. S. aureus is
naturally resistant to almost all antibiotics that have already been created,
but it is also capable of quickly acquiring drug resistance mechanisms, which
makes it difficult to utilise even the strongest
antibacterial agents, like methicillin and vancomycin [2]. There
have not been many new antibacterial medications introduced in recent years,
despite the rise in bacterial antibiotic resistance. This indicates that there
is a significant unmet medical demand for novel antibiotics [3].
Bacterial biofilms are common and are thought to be highly structured
collections of cells that can attach to surfaces and produce an extracellular
matrix [4]. Many clinically significant pathogenic bacteria are
known to generate biofilms, with S. aureus, Staphylococcus
epidermidis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
being notable examples [5]. Numerous hospitals acquired infections have
been linked to biofilms. Healthcare costs have increased significantly as a
result of the chronic tissue- and device-associated infections caused by S.
aureus biofilm and their innate resistance to the effects of treatment
antibiotics [6]. It is vital to provide novel therapeutic options
due to the ongoing evolution of drug-resistant bacteria and the scarcity of
medicines with antibiofilm action [7]. In this regard, one of the
primary sources of bioactive compounds for antibacterial uses is medicinal plants
[8]. Natural remedies can be quite effective at destroying bacterial
biofilms of many kinds. In addition to operating against strains resistant to
traditional medications, such compounds typically have reduced harmful effects
and can operate as a template for numerous chemical alterations intended to
increase their efficacy [9].
Glycerol monolaurate, or monolaurin, is a surfactant
that was initially made accessible as a dietary supplement in 1960 [10].
Monolaurin is prized for its health advantages, particularly as an immune
system booster. Monolaurin has been studied as a dietary supplement for its
potential to strengthen the immune system against a variety of illnesses,
including the common cold, influenza, swine flu, herpes simplex, and other
chronic metabolic inflammatory disorders [11,12]. Monolaurin
is largely produced chemically from glycerol and lauric acid as an ester
(monoester) (12-carbon medium-chain saturated fatty acid). Coconut oil is the
richest source of monolaurin, a naturally occurring monoester [13].
Human breast milk contains a sizable amount of GML as well [14].
Palm kernel oil is another source of GML and is significantly more susceptible to
enzymatic degradation via hydrolysis. GML is a prime contender for the cosmetic
sector, where it is employed as a surfactant, a dispersant, and an emulsifier
agent, in addition to serving as an immune booster and nutritional supplement [15].
In the past few decades, the usage of GML as a food ingredient, emulsifier, and
preservative has expanded significantly. The antibacterial characteristics of
GML are well known, however, un-saturation, the length of the carbon backbone,
and cis/trans orientation change the activity [16]. According to
reports, GML exhibits antibacterial activity that is more than 200 times
greater than that of lauric acid [17].
Numerous studies have shown that GML inhibits the
growth of a variety of microbial species, including S. aureus, Enterococcus
faecalis, P. aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii.
Additionally, GML has shown antiviral activity against a variety of
RNA-positive strand viruses, including influenza and coronavirus [18].
Although the antiviral potential of GML is not fully understood, preliminary
research has shown that GML nutritional supplements enhance host immunity and
control interferon pathways [19]. The ability of GML to modify
interferon and other antiviral pathways makes it effective against the zika,
mumps, and yellow fever viruses. Ex-vivo experiments have concurrently
shown that GML suppresses the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines [20].
A wise strategy for reducing the threat of infections caused by S. aureus
biofilms could be the creation of small molecule ligands that precisely target
crucial stages involved in biofilm production. In this study, natural
anti-staphylococcal chemicals were designed into drugs, and the AutoDock tool was used to dock monolaurin against ClfA (clumping factor A).
MATERIALS AND METHODS-
The study was carried out in 2022 (July to September) using a high computing
configuration system with RAM 8 gb and Linux
operating system with a processor speed 2.4 ghz. The
study was carried out using AutoDock Vina 1_1_2
version (https://vina.scripps.edu/).
Other tools were used in the study as free versions from ExPasy
tools.
Target and Ligand
identification- Several publications were used to identify
the ligand and target. It was discovered that the substance monolaurin has
anti-biofilm activity and that Staphylococcus aureus clumping factor A
is one of the crucial proteins involved in the biofilm development process.
Therefore, these compounds were taken for additional examination.
Lipinski rule
analysis using the Swiss ADME- Swiss
ADME technique was used to examine the monolaurin's drug-likeness
characteristics. Input for it came in the form of compound grins. The Swiss
ADME server was used to forecast the molecular characteristics and biological
activity of the medicines displaying strong affinity.
Docking
Target
preparation- The three-dimensional structure of ClfA (PDB ID: 1N67)
was retrieved from Research Collaborator for
Structural Bioinformatics (RCSB) Protein data bank.
Ligand
preparation- The PubChem database was used to acquire
the monolaurin structure. The Open Babel converter tool is then used to convert
the structure that was obtained from PubChem to PDB files.
Ligplot analysis using PDB sum- LIGPLOT
v.4.5.3 PDB sum program was used to predict the binding sites of the drug
monolaurin in a receptor ClfA. Four letter pdb code of ClfA (1N67)
was given as an input. From input Protein Data Bank files, the LIGPLOT
application mechanically creates schematic 2-D representations of
protein-ligand interactions. The LIGPLOT diagram showed a schematic
representation of all hydrogen bonds and non-bonded contacts between the
residues of the protein molecules in the structure and the ligand. Hydrogen bonds
were displayed as green dashed lines that were identified with the bond's
length in degrees (A°).
Docking
using AutoDock- Using
AutoDock vina, the ligand analogue monolaurin was
docked to the ClfA receptor. AutoDock
forecasts how ligands and targets will interact, and it frequently ranks
molecules with more subtle affinities. The initial step is to retrieve the
target (ClfA.pdb) and ligand (monolaurin chemical compound.pdb) files from
databases. The preparation of grid and parameter files (config.txt) for AutoDock Vina, ClfA. pdbqt, and monolaurin chemical molecule in PDBQT format is
the second stage. A docked complex was produced in the end.
Analysis of docked complex using Pymol-
Using the offline structure visualization programme Pymol, the hydrogen
bond formation between the ligand and receptor in the docked complex was
examined. PyMOL is modelling and visualization
software for working computational scientists.
RESULTS- Lipinski rules analysis using Swiss ADME- A study was conducted to
confirm the theoretical absorption of monolaurin in this work and in Silico. It
was feasible to determine whether the monolaurin molecule might be developed as
a medicine based on the values of the physical-chemical characteristics shown
in Table 1 that were calculated using the online application Swiss ADME. This
was done using the Lipinski, Ghose, Veber, and Egan guidelines. Table 1
displays the data that was obtained.
Table 1: In-silico studies of Lipinski's parameters of monolaurin
Monolaurin |
||
Physicochemical Properties |
||
Formula |
C15H30O4 |
|
Molecular Weight |
|
|
Num. Heavy atoms |
19 |
|
Fraction Csp3 |
0.93 |
|
Num. Rotatable Bonds |
14 |
|
Num. H-bonds acceptors |
4 |
|
Num. H-bonds donors |
2 |
|
Molar Refractivity |
77.83 |
|
TPSA 1 |
66.76 Å 2 |
|
Lipophilicity |
||
Consensus 2 Log Po/w 3 |
3.22 |
|
Water Solubility |
||
Log S (Ali) |
−5.27 |
|
Class 4 |
Moderately Soluble |
|
Drug likeness |
||
Lipinski 5 |
Yes; 0 violation |
|
Ghose 6 |
Yes |
|
Veber 7 |
No; 1
violation: Rotors>10 |
|
Egan 8 |
Yes |
|
Bioavailability Score |
0.55 |
1TPSA=Topological
Polar Surface Area; 2Consensus Log Po/w=Average of all five
predictions; 3Log Po/w=Partition coefficient between
n-octanol/water; 4Class=Ali classes: insoluble<−10<poor<−6<moderately
soluble<−4<soluble<−2<very
soluble<0<highly; 5Lipinski=MM≤500; Log Po/w≤5;
H-bond donors≤5; H-bond acceptors≤10; 6Ghose=180≤MM≤480;
20≤No. of atoms≤70; 40≤Molar Refractivity≤130; −0.4≤Log
Po/w ≤ 5.6; 7Veber=Num. Rotatable Bonds≤10;
TPSA≤140 Å2; 8Egan=Log Po/w≤5.88; TPSA≤131.6
Å2
A
substance's molecular mass is a crucial metric since a substance's volume and
the ease with which a molecule can enter the intracellular environment are both
impacted by molecular mass. Monolaurin has a molecular mass of 274.40 g/mol,
which is consistent with Lipinski's rule. Log P, which is associated with a
substance's hydrophobicity and capacity to cross plasma membranes, is another
significant parameter. With values for acceptors of 4 and donors of 2, the
results shown in Fig. 1 for the number of hydrogen acceptors and donors follow
Lipinski's rule. Lipinski's rule of five comparisons of these numbers indicates
that monolaurin has excellent theoretical oral bioavailability.
Fig. 1: Structures of monolaurin
LIGPLOT analysis using PDB
sum- Total three binding residues Leu
283(A), Lys 281(A) and Asp 340(A) were predicted using PDB sum LIGPLOT
analysis, as shown in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2: Ligplot of ClfA
With estimated binding
energy of kcal/mol, the molecule monolaurin has demonstrated an excellent
affinity for the receptor ClfA. Natural
anti-staphylococcal chemical monolaurin will be used as a possible medicine for
treating staphylococcal infections in humans by carrying out drug design
studies for S. aureus.
Hydrogen bond formation analysis of docked complex
using Pymol-
total 3 hydrogen bonds with Tyr 376, Asp 370 and Asp 340 were analyzed in the
monolaurin - ClfA docked complex as shown
in Fig. 3.
Fig. 3: Pymol analysis of monolaurin-ClfA docked complex
DISCUSSION-
The
primary threat to human health and the healthcare system is bacterial
infections. Several bacterial species have recently developed resistance to a
wide variety of antibiotics and antimicrobial agents [19]. In this
context, plasmid, transposon, and chromosomal DNA are examples of new processes
in that bacteria have evolved [21]. Such a sophisticated strategy
increases pathogen pathogenicity [14]. As a result of developed
resistance to a variety of antibiotics and antimicrobial medicines, new
molecules are needed to combat such infections. A promising nutritional
supplement called monolaurin strongly inhibits the production of biofilms by a
variety of microorganisms, primarily bacterial species. Additionally, bacteria
that lack biofilms or produce them inefficiently are more vulnerable to
antibiotics [22]. A study of the clinical use of monolaurin by
Archer et al. in 2011 led to the conclusion that it had antibacterial
properties [23]. According to the study, monolaurin's antimicrobial
effectiveness against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes,
Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus suis, Enterococcus faecalis, Bacillus
anthracis Sterne, Campylobacter jejuni,
Fusobacterium species, Pseudomona sp.
The study also shows that bacteria like Shigella sonnei,
Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus vulgaris, Salmonella minnesota, E. coli, and Klebsiella aerogenes are
resistant to monolaurin. Candida albicans has been shown to have
anti-biofilm formation activity in a study by Lopes et al. [24].
Natural
anti-staphylococcal chemical monolaurin will be used as a possible medicine for
treating staphylococcal infections in humans by carrying out drug design
studies for S. aureus.
Acknowledgement- The author would like to thank Acharya
Nagarjuna University for providing support for the study. The author also
thanks and acknowledge the Apollo Institute of Medical Sciences and Research
Hyderabad for support in the study.
CONTRIBUTION OF AUTHORS
Research
concept- Dr D Srinivas Rao
Research
design- Rabiathul Shameerasm, Dr D Srinivas Rao
Supervision-Dr D Srinivas Rao, Dr M V Raghavendra Rao
Materials- Dr D Srinivas Rao, KL Prathusha
Data
collection- Rabiathul Shameerasm
Data
analysis and Interpretation- Dr Mahendra Kumar
Verma
Literature
search- KL Prathusha
Writing
article- Dr M V Raghavendra
Rao
Critical
review- Dr Mahendra Kumar
Verma
Article
editing- Dr D Srinivas Rao,
Dr Rekha
Final approval- Dr Rekha, Dr M V Raghavendra Rao
REFERENCES
1. Fu X, Feng F, Huang B.
Physicochemical characterization and evaluation of a microemulsion system for
antimicrobial activity of glycerol monolaurate. Int
J Pharm., 2006; 321(1-2): 171–75. doi:
10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.05.019.
2.
Lieberman S, Enig MG, Preuss HG. A review
of monolaurin and lauric acid. Altern Complement Ther., 2006; 12(6):
310–14. doi: 10.1089/act.2006.12.310.
3.
Hegde BM. Coconut oil-ideal fat next only
to mother's milk (scanning coconut's horoscope). J Indian Acad Clin Med., 2006; 7(1): 16–19.
4.
Clarke NM, May JT. Effect of
antimicrobial factors in human milk on rhinoviruses and milk-borne
cytomegalovirus in vitro. J Med Microbiol.,
2000; 49(8): 719–23. doi:
10.1099/0022-1317-49-8-719.
5.
Oo KC,
Stumpf PK. Some enzymic activities in the germinating oil palm (Elaeis guineensis)
seedling. Plant Physiol., 1983; 73(4): 1028–32. doi: 10.1104/pp.73.4.1028.
6.
Milne GWA. Wiley; Hoboken, NJ. Gardner's Commercially Important Chemicals:
Synonyms, Trade Names, and Properties, 2005. Available
at: https://www.perlego.com/book/2760450/gardners-commercially-important-chemicals-synonyms-trade-names-and-properties-pdf.
7.
Kabara JJ, Swieczkowski DM, Conley AJ,
Truant JP. Fatty acids and derivatives as antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother.,
1972; 2(1): 23–28.
8.
Isaacs CE, Kim KS, Thormar H. Inactivation of enveloped viruses in human
bodily fluids by purified lipids. Ann N Y Acad
Sci., 1994; 724: 457–64. doi:
10.1111/j.1749-6632.1994.tb38947.x.
9.
Taylor TA, Unakal CG. Staphylococcus aureus. 2022 Feb 14. In:
Stat Pearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls
Publishing. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28722898/,
2022.
10. Schlievert PM, Strandberg KL, Lin YC, Peterson ML, Leung DY.
Secreted virulence factor comparison between methicillin-resistant and
methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, and its relevance to atopic
dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol., 2010; 125(1): 39-49. doi:
10.1016/j.jaci.2009.10.039.
11. Spaulding AR, Satterwhite EA, Lin YC, Chuang-Smith ON et al.
Comparison of Staphylococcus aureus strains for ability to cause
infective endocarditis and lethal sepsis in rabbits. Front Cell Infect Microbiol., 2012; 2: 18. doi:
10.3389/fcimb.2012.00018.
12. Assimacopoulos
AP, Strandberg KL, Rotschafer JH, Schlievert PM. Extreme pyrexia and rapid
death due to Staphylococcus aureus infection: analysis of 2 cases. Clin
Infect Dis., 2009; 48: 612–14. doi: 10.1086/597009.
13. Archer NK, Mazaitis MJ, Costerton JW, Leid JG, Powers ME, Shirtliff
ME. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: properties, regulation, and roles in
human disease. Virulence, 2011; 2(5): 445-59. doi:
10.4161/viru.2.5.17724.
14. Beveridge TJ, Makin SA, Kadurugamuwa
JL, Li Z. Interactions between biofilms and the environment. FEMS Microbiol Rev., 1997; 20: 291–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1997.tb00315.x.
15. Xu KD, McFeters GA, Stewart PS. Biofilm resistance to
antimicrobial agents. Microbiol., 2000; 146: 547–49.
16. Beenken KE, Dunman PM, McAleese F, Macapagal D, Murphy E, et
al. Global gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. J Bacteriol., 2004; 186: 4665-84. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.14.4665-84.2004.
17. Cramton SE, Gerke C, Schnell NF, Nichols WW, Gotz F. The intercellular
adhesion (ica) locus is present in Staphylococcus
aureus and is required for biofilm formation. Infect Immun., 1999; 67:
5427–33. doi:
10.1128/IAI.67.10.5427-5433.1999.
18. Zhang Q, Yi D, Ji C, Wu T, Wang M, et al. Monolaurin Confers
a Protective Effect Against Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Infection in
Piglets by Regulating the Interferon Pathway. Front Immunol., 2022; 12: 797476.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.797476.
19. Welch JL, Xiang J, Okeoma CM,
Schlievert PM, Stapleton JT. Glycerol Monolaurate,
an Analogue to a Factor Secreted by Lactobacillus, Is Virucidal Against
Enveloped Viruses, Including HIV-1. mBio.,
2020; 11(3):
e00686–20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00686-20.
20. Peterson ML, Schlievert PM. Glycerol
Monolaurate Inhibits the Effects of Gram-Positive Select Agents on Eukaryotic
Cells. Biochem.,
2006; 45: 2387–97. doi:
10.1021/bi051992u.
21. Fitzpatrick F, Humphreys H, O'Gara JP. The genetics of staphylococcal
biofilm formation-will a greater understanding of pathogenesis lead to better
management of device-related infection? Clin Microbiol Infect., 2005; 11: 967–73.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01274.x.
22. Tong SY,
Davis JS, Eichenberger E, Holland TL, Fowler VG. Staphylococcus aureus
infections: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and
management. Clin Microbiol Rev., 2015; 28(3): 603-61.
doi: 10.1128/CMR.00134-14.
23. Archer NK, Mazaitis MJ, Costerton JW, Leid
JG, Powers ME, et al. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: properties,
regulation, and roles in human disease. Viru., 2011; 2(5): 445-59. doi: 10.4161/viru.2.5.17724.
24. Lopes LQS,
Santos CG, Vaucher RA, Raffin RP, Santos RCV. Nanocapsules with glycerol monolaurate: effects on Candida
albica.