SSR Inst. Int. J. Life Sci., 8(5): 3092-3096, September 2022
Study of Biochemical Profile in Newly
Diagnosed Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma in North Indian populations- A Tertiary
Care Centre Study
Shilpi
Singh1, Shreya Nigoskar2, Anand
Narayan Singh3, Pramod Kumar Singh4, Prashant Tripathi5*
1Research
Scholar, Department of Biochemistry, Index Medical College, Indore, M.P., India
2Professor&
Head, Department of Biochemistry, Index Medical College, Indore, M.P., India
3Professor
& Head, Department of Biochemistry, GSVM Medical College Kanpur U.P., India
4Associate
Professor, J.K. Cancer Institute, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur, U.P., India
5Associate
Professor, Department of Biochemistry, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur, U.P.,
India
*Address for
Correspondence: Dr. Prashant
Tripathi, Associate Professor, Department of
Biochemistry, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur, U.P., 208002, India
E-mail: prashantamu@gmail.com
ABSTRACT- Background: Globally ‘oral cancer’ is the sixth most common cause of
cancer-related death. Oral cancer accounts for approximately 30-40% of all
cancers in India. The present study was conducted to assess biochemical
parameters in newly diagnosed oral
cancer.
Methods: The present study was conducted to assess biochemical
parameters in newly diagnosed
oral squamous cell carcinoma.
The study was conducted at GSVM Medical College, Kanpur among 196 newly
diagnosed patients with oral squamous
cell carcinoma and 196
healthy individuals. Serum samples from the participants were collected. The
data were expressed as mean±SD. Values of p<0.001 were considered
significant.
Results: The present study was conducted to assess biochemical
parameters in newly diagnosed oral cancer. The study was conducted at
GSVM Medical College, Kanpur among 196 newly diagnosed patients with oral
cancer and 196 healthy individuals. The levels of Random Blood Sugar, Serum
Total Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, Glutamic-oxalacetic
transaminase (SGOT), glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (SGPT), Serum Protein, Serum
Albumin, Serum Creatinine, Serum Sodium, Serum Potassium were increased in
cases as compared to controls. The p-value was non-significant for all
the biochemical parameters.
Conclusion: The present study concluded that the levels of Random Blood Sugar,
Serum Total Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, SGOT, SGPT, Serum
Protein, Serum Albumin, Serum Creatinine, Serum Sodium, Serum Potassium were
increased in cases as compared to healthy controls.
Keywords: Biochemical
parameters, Oral cancer, Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), Serum
INTRODUCTION- Oral
cancer is the sixth most prevalent cancer worldwide [1,2]. In the Indian subcontinent,
it ranks among the three most common types of cancer [3]. The history of oral cancer shows that it is
preceded in more than 70% of the patients by a recognized premalignant lesion
(PML) [4]. Even
though it is one of the most mortal cancers, the survival rate could be
enhanced by quick diagnosis and referrals [5]. So, to prevent
various pathological manifestations and for early detections, variation in the
levels of trace elements needs to be treated [6]. In connection
with the visual localization of tumors of the oropharyngeal zone, the primary
diagnosis is most often established based on examination and biopsy data [7].
In the current international practical recommendations, the standard diagnostic
method is computer tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging with
intravenous contrast [8]. Various studies are devoted to the use of
“omics” technologies, including genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic and
metabolic profiling for the detection of biomarkers of oral cancer in tissues,
blood, cell lines, urine, etc [9-11]. The prognostic significance of
various factors has been studied in a sufficient number of studies, but at the
moment, unfortunately, no single indicator or combination thereof has been
found that unequivocally allows us to assess the prognosis of the course of the
disease and the risk of its relapse [12-14]. The aim of the study
was a comprehensive assessment of the biochemical parameters in newly
diagnosed oral squamous cell carcinoma.
MATERIAL AND
METHODS
Study design and
subjects- The
present study was conducted to assess
biochemical parameters in newly diagnosed oral squamous cell carcinoma at GSVM Medical College, Kanpur among 196
newly diagnosed patients of OSCC and 196 healthy individuals. Only those
subjects, who have given written permission in the form of informed consent
were included in the study.
Oral squamous cell carcinoma cases
Inclusion criteria
· Subjects
newly diagnosed with histopathologically confirmed Oral SCC.
· Age
group between 21 to 90 years, male or female
Exclusion criteria
· The
cases should not have yet received any specific therapy (radiotherapy,
chemotherapy or any other adjunctive treatments).
Healthy control group
Inclusion criteria
· Subjects
without any oral lesion.
· Age
and sex-matched subjects aged between 21 to 65 years.
Exclusion criteria
· No
current use of prescribed or non-prescribed medications
· No
chronic acute illness like diabetes, hypertension, TB, HIV positive or any
other endocrinal disorder.
· Pregnant
and lactating subjects were excluded.
Sample collection- Serum samples from the
participants were collected before any therapeutic procedure as below
mentioned:
Serum- 5 ml of the intravenous blood sample from
each participant was drawn through venipuncture. The whole blood was collected
into a plain vacutainer until blood clot formation. Serum was separated by
centrifugation at approximately 1000×g for 10 min and removed serum and was
stored at -200C till the further process of biochemical analysis.
Statistical Analysis- Data were tabulated and
statistically analyzed using the software Statistical Package for Social
Sciences (SPSS, v. 22). The data were expressed as mean ± SD Values of P<
0.001 were considered significant.
Ethical
Approval- The
study was ethically approved by the Ethics Committee of GSVM Medical College,
Kanpur (39/E.C./Acad./24.07.2019). This case-control study was carried out at
the JK Cancer Institute, Kanpur and the Department of Dental Surgery and
Biochemistry, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur, India.
RESULTS- The
present study was conducted to assess
biochemical parameters in newly diagnosed oral cancer. The study was
conducted at GSVM Medical College, Kanpur among 196 newly diagnosed patients
with oral cancer and 196 healthy individuals. The Biochemical profiles among the study groups are summarized in
Table 1. The random blood sugar levels in cases were 131.69 mg/dL and
controls were 128.6 mg/dL. The haemoglobin levels in cases were 12.78 g/dL and
in controls were 12.99 g/dL. The Serum Total Bilirubin levels in cases were
1.08 mg/dL and in controls were 1.00 mg/dL. The Direct Bilirubin levels in
cases were 0.79 mg/dL and in controls were 0.68 mg/dL. Indirect Bilirubin
levels in cases were 0.75 mg/dL and in controls were 0.65 mg/dL. The SGOT
levels in cases were 23.36 mg/dL and in controls were 21.44 mg/dL. The SGPT
levels in cases were 34.02 mg/dL and in controls were 32.03 mg/dL. The serum
protein levels in cases were 7.72 g/dL and in controls were 7.61 g/dL. The
serum albumin levels in cases were 4.14 g/dL and in controls were 4.65 g/dL.
The serum creatinine levels in cases were 1.16 g/dL and in controls were 1.0
g/dL. The serum sodium levels in cases were 133.8 g/dL and in controls were
131.4 g/dL. The serum potassium levels in cases were 3.91 g/dL and in controls
were 3.60 g/dL. The p-value was non-significant for all the biochemical
parameters. The levels of random blood sugar, serum total bilirubin, direct
bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, SGOT, SGPT, serum protein, serum albumin, serum
creatinine, serum sodium, serum potassium was increased in cases as compared to
controls.
Table
1: Comparison of Biochemical parameters between cases
and controls
Parameter |
Case (Mean± SD) |
Control (Mean± SD) |
t-test |
p-value |
Random
Blood Sugar |
131.69±35.61 |
128.6±35.61 |
0.35 |
0.56 |
Haemoglobin |
12.78±1.48 |
12.99±1.47 |
1.03 |
0.31 |
Serum
Total Bilirubin |
1.08±0.33 |
1.0±0.32 |
1.64 |
0.10 |
Direct
Bilirubin |
0.79±0.32 |
0.68±0.32 |
2.41 |
0.04 |
Indirect
Bilirubin |
0.75±0.33 |
0.65±0.33 |
2.12 |
0.03 |
SGOT |
23.36±8.25 |
21.44±8.07 |
1.65 |
0.10 |
SGPT |
34.02±23.16 |
32.03±23.19 |
0.3 |
0.76 |
Serum
Protein |
7.72±0.74 |
7.61±0.72 |
0.61 |
0.69 |
Serum
Albumin |
4.14±0.58 |
4.65±0.55 |
2.19 |
0.13 |
Serum
Creatinine |
1.16±0.37 |
1.0±0.14 |
2.07 |
0.24 |
Serum
Sodium |
133.8±8.74 |
131.4±6.83 |
1.16 |
0.55 |
Serum
Potassium |
3.91±0.53 |
3.60±0.49 |
1.38 |
0.32 |
SGOT:
Serum
glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase, SGPT: Serum glutamic-oxaloacetic
transaminase
DISCUSSION- Oral cancer is prevalent
worldwide and it is also a common cause of morbidity and mortality. Cancers of
the oral cavity are surface malignancies whose signs and symptoms can be
recognized early. The typical demographic profile of an individual with OSCC,
as described in the literature is that of a man in the fifth to the eighth
decade of life, who is a smoker and a drinker [2,4,16,17]. The
random blood sugar levels in cases were 131.69 mg/dL and controls were 128.6
mg/dL. The haemoglobin levels in cases were 12.78 g/dL and in controls were
12.99 g/dL. The Serum Total Bilirubin levels in cases were 1.08mg/dL and in
controls were 1 mg/dL. The Direct Bilirubin levels in cases were 0.79 mg/dL and
in controls were 0.68 mg/dL. Indirect Bilirubin levels in cases were 0.75 mg/dL
and in controls were 0.65 mg/dL. The SGOT levels in cases were 23.36 mg/dL and
in controls were 21.44 mg/dL. Serum SGPT levels in cases were 34.02 mg/dL and
in controls were 32.03 mg/dL. The serum protein levels in cases were 7.72g/dL
and in controls were 7.61g/dL. The serum albumin levels in cases were 4.14 g/dL
and in controls were 4.65 g/dL. The serum creatinine levels in cases were 1.16
g/dL and in controls were 1.0 g/dL. The serum sodium levels in cases were 133.8
g/dL and in controls were 131.4 g/dL. The serum potassium levels in cases were
3.91 g/dL and in controls were 3.60 g/dL. The p-value was
non-significant for all the biochemical parameters. The levels of random blood
sugar, serum total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, sgot, sgpt,
serum protein, serum albumin, serum creatinine, serum sodium, serum potassium
was increased in cases as compared to controls.
Against
the background of OSCC, according to some data, the author noted an increase in
the level of calcium, inorganic phosphate, magnesium, and sodium and a decrease
in the level of potassium.[18] The studies of
Shetty et al. [19] and Sanjay et al. [20] respectively,
have reported increased values of salivary LDH and total proteins in oral
cavity lesions. Awasthi [21] suggests that concurrent analysis of
salivary CYFRA 21-1, LDH, total protein, and amylase can be utilized for early
detection of oral cancer.
CONCLUSIONS- The
present study concluded that the levels of Random Blood Sugar, Serum Total
Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin, SGOT, SGPT, Serum Protein,
Serum Albumin, Serum Creatinine, Serum Sodium, Serum Potassium were increased
in cases as compared to healthy controls.
Prospective
use of these markers in the clinical setting will enable early detection,
prediction of response to treatment, improvement in treatment selection, and
early detection of tumour recurrence for disease monitoring. However, most of
these markers for OSCC are yet to be validated.
CONTRIBUTION OF AUTHORS
Research concept- Dr. Shreya Nigoskar, Shilpi Singh
Research design- Dr. Prashant Tripathi
Supervision- Dr. Shreya Nigoskar, Dr. Prashant Tripathi
Materials- Shilpi Singh
Data collection- Dr. Pramod Kumar Singh, Shilpi Singh
Data analysis and Interpretation- Dr. Shreya Nigoskar, Dr. Prashant Tripathi, Shilpi Singh
Literature search- Shilpi Singh
Writing article- Shilpi Singh
Critical review- Dr. Shreya Nigoskar, Dr. Prashant Tripathi, Dr. Anand Narayan Singh, Shilpi Singh
Article editing- Dr. Shreya Nigoskar, Dr. Prashant Tripathi
Final approval- Shilpi Singh, Dr. Shreya Nigoskar, Dr. Prashant Tripathi
REFERENCES
1. Cheng YS, Rees T, Wright J. A review
of research on salivary biomarkers for oral cancer detection. Clin Transl Med.,
2014; 3: 3.
2. Mills SE, editor. Sternberg's
Diagnostic Surgical Pathology. The Jaws and Oral Cavity. 5th ed.,
Vol. I. Wolters Kluwer-Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2010: pp. 773-820.
3. Coelho KR. Challenges of the oral
cancer burden in India. J Cancer Epidemiol., 2012; 2012: 701932.
4. Neville BW, Day TA. Oral cancer and
precancerous lesions. CA Cancer J Clin., 2002; 52: 195-215.
5. Warnakulasuriya
S. Global epidemiology of oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol., 2009; 45:
309.
6. Jayadeep
A, Pillai KR, Kannan S, Nalinakumari KR, et al.
Serum levels of copper, zinc, iron and ceruplasmin in oral leukoplakia and
squamous cell carcinoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res., 1997; 16: 295–300.
7. Osipyan YO, Mudunov AM.
Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of the local
advancement of oral and oropharyngeal cancer as the key factor of treatment
selection (literature review) Head Neck Tumors, 2017;
7: 53–62. doi: 10.17650/2222-1468-2017-7-4-53-62.
8. Wolff KD, Follmann M, Nast A. The
Diagnosis and Treatment of Oral Cavity Cancer. Dtsch Aerzteblatt Online, 2012;
109: 829–35. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0829.
9. Rai V, Mukherjee R, Ghosh AK,
Routray A, Chakraborty C. "Omics" in oral cancer: New approaches for
biomarker discovery. Arch Oral Biol., 2018; 87: 15–34. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.12.003.
10. Musharraf SG, Shahid N, Naqvi SMA,
Saleem M, Siddiqui AJ, Ali A. Metabolite Profiling of Preneoplastic and Neoplastic
Lesions of Oral Cavity Tissue Samples Revealed a Biomarker Pattern. Sci Rep.,
2016; 6: 38985. doi: 10.1038/srep38985.
11. Chi LM, Hsiao YC, Chien KY, Chen SF,
Chuang YN, et al. Assessment of candidate biomarkers in paired saliva and
plasma samples from oral cancer patients by targeted mass spectrometry. J.
Proteom., 2019; 211: 103571. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2019.103571.
12. Park HC, Kim MY, Kim CH.
C-reactive protein/albumin ratio as prognostic score in oral squamous cell
carcinoma. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg., 2016;
42: 243–50. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2016.42.5.243.
13. Kutukova SI, Manikhas
GM, Yaremenko AI, Chukhlovin AB, Belyak NP, et al. Prognostic role of laboratory
and immunohistochemical markers in the recurrence of oral mucosal squamous cell
carcinoma. Head Neck Tumors, 2014; 3: 47–50.
14. Barak V, Meirovitz A,
Leibovici V, Rachmut J, Peretz T, et al. The Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of
Tumor Markers (CEA, SCC, CYFRA 21-1, TPS) in Head and Neck Cancer Patients. Anticancer Res., 2015; 35:
5519–24.
15. Navazesh M. Methods for collecting saliva. Ann NY Acad Sci., 1993; 694:
72-77.
16. Khandekar SP, Bagdey PS, Tiwari RR.
Oral cancer and some epidemiological factors: A hospital-based study. Indian J
Community Med., 2006; 31: 157-59.
17. Madani AH, Dikshit M,
Bhaduri D. Risk for oral cancer associated to smoking, smokeless and oral dip
products. Indian J Public Health, 2012; 56: 57-60. doi: 10.4103/0019-557X.96977.
18. Błoniarz J, Rahnama
M, Zareba S. Influence of carcinogenesis in the oral cavity on the level of
some bioelements in the saliva. Year State Hig., 2003;
54: 295–300.
19. Shetty SR, Chadha R, Babu
S, Kumari S, Bhat S, et al. Salivary lactate dehydrogenase levels in oral
leukoplakia and oral squamous cell carcinoma: A biochemical and
clinicopathological study. J Cancer Res Ther., 2012; 8(S1): S123-25. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.92226.
20. Sanjay PR, Hallikeri K,
Shivashankara AR. Evaluation of salivary sialic acid, total protein, and total
sugar in oral cancer: A preliminary report. Indian J Dent Res., 2008; 19:
288-91.
21. Awasthi N. Role of
salivary biomarkers in early detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Indian
J Pathol Microbiol., 2017; 1; 60(4): 464.