Research Article (Open access) |
---|
SSR Inst. Int. J. Life. Sci.,
5(5):
2372-2378, September 2019
Comparative
Study of Foramen Magnum in Dry Cadaveric Skull and 3D CT Images
Arjun
Kumar 1, Pratishtha Potdar2*,
Kuldeep Singh3, Jagmohan Singh Dhakar4
1Resident, Department of
Anatomy, Rama Medical College & Research Institute Kanpur, India
2Associate
Professor, Department of Anatomy, Santosh Medical College, Ghaziabad, India
3Professor & Head,
Department of Anatomy, Badauyun Medical College, U.P., India
4Statistician cum Assistant Professor,
Department of Community Medicine, Santosh Medical College, Ghaziabad, India
*Address for Correspondence: Dr. Pratishtha Potdar,
Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy Santosh Medical College, Ghaziabad,
India
E-mail: drpratishthagupta@gmail.com
ABSTRACT- Background: The anatomical knowledge of foramen magnum is helpful for
forensic investigations, anthropological identification of unknown individual
and intracranial surgeries. The aim of our study was to provide morphometric
data of foramen magnum in dry human skulls and CT images, which can be applied
for many invasive surgical as well as diagnostic procedures carried out in
brain.
Methods: In this study, 50 adult
human skulls and 50 CT images
were taken. The various parameter of foramen magnum were calculated using a
vernier caliper to an accuracy of 0.01 mm and the same parameters were also
evaluated in adult CT brain images. The distributions of shapes were also
assessed visually in foramen magnum of dry skull and CT images.
Results: In our study on 50 dry
skull, the mean antero-posterior diameter, transverse diameter were 34.08±2.25
mm and 28.17±2.85 mm as well as the same diameters in 100 CT images was 34.95±2.42 mm in males and
32.64±1.89 mm in females. The mean area of foramen magnum in dry skull was
757.41±115.09 mm2 and in CT images was 788.95±95.71 mm in males and
681.22±66.97 mm in females. This data were then compared and analyzed with the
various other studies.
Conclusion: The dimensions in CT images
were significantly higher than dry skull. The commonest shape found was oval
followed by irregular; least was round in both dry skull and CT images. Hence,
further study is required as foramen magnum has great clinical
significance.
Key Words: Antero posterior,
Foramen magnum, Morphometric dimensions, Transverse, Skull
INTRODUCTION- The knowledge of foramen magnum
is of great importance for neurologist as well as radiologist as it is very
important land mark due to its close relationship with brainstem and spinal
cord. The margins of the foramen magnum are interiorly encroached by the
occipital condyles, which articulate with the superior articular facets of the atlas [1]. The
foramen magnum is protected by Soft tissue mass
inferiorly [2,3]. This makes it difficult to assess lesions in case
of fractures etc, but with CT imaging techniques a comparison between the dried
skulls and CT images can help in more precise localization of lesion. The
morphometric data of foramen magnum can be used for diagnosis of various
congenital diseases such as Arnold Chiari malformation in which expansion of
transverse diameter more than antero-posterior diameter [4]. The
diameter of the foramen magnum is also needed before the surgery of the
posterior cranial fossa lesions as greater contra lateral exposure required,
where antero-posterior diameter is more. The morphological parameters of the
foramen magnum are more in males than in females which can be utilized for
differentiation of sex in various medico legal conditions [5].
Various studies of foramen magnum shows
that the antero-posterior and transverse diameter is 3.5 cm and 3 cm.
Compression of brainstem due to various pathological conditions causes life
threatening respiratory complications [6,7]. The craniometric points
can be located and accurate measurements are achieved from CT scan images than
on conventional radiographs [8]. CT scan has minimal superimposition
of structures and allows better visualization of minute differences of density.
The existing literature reveals numerous studies on dry skull using foramen
magnum but very few have reported using CT scan. Sexual dimorphisms of the FM
in three-dimensional (3D) CT have 81% accuracy in determining the Gender [9].
Further, foramen magnum
parameter index is also utilized for differentiations of races among skull as
there exist some racial relationships among different shapes of foramen magnum
[10]. Thus considering the above importance of foramen magnum, we
calculate the antero-posterior diameter, transverse diameter along with the
measurement of area of foramen magnum
in both dry human skull and CT images. We also analyzed variations of its shape
which can be utilized by Clinicians for various surgical and diagnostic procedures.
MATERIAL AND METHODS- The present study of
foramen magnum was done on 50 dry skulls and 50 CT images in the Department of
Anatomy, Rama Medical College, Hapur, India from February 2017 to August 2017.
Three dimensional CT head
images were taken from. O. P. Gupta Imaging Centre, Meerut, India. Complete dry
skulls of age group between (18–70 yrs) were taken from department after taking
ethical clearance from ethical committee. The skulls that are broken or
incomplete and those of children and old age were excluded from the study. All
dimensions of foramen magnum in dry human skulls were measured with the vernier
calipers with an accuracy of 0.01 mm. All dimensions were measured by two observer to
prevent inter observer error. The dimensions measured were includes the
following:
Antero-posterior diameter
/Foramen magnum length (FML)- Antero posterior diameter was measured by
taking a point on the middle of anterior margin to the point on the middle of
posterior margin of the foramen magnum as shown in (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1: showing measurement of Antero
posterior diameter
Transverse diameter/ Foramen magnum width
(FMW)- The width of foramen magnum was taken by measuring most prominent
parts of the lateral curvature as straight transverse diameter (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2: showing
measurement of Transverse diameter
The two prongs of vernier
calipers were fixed with screw over bony margins of foramen magnum then the
length and width were recorded over the graduated metallic scale.
Foramen magnum Area
(FMA)-
The area of foramen magnum was calculated as described by Kumar et al. [11] using Radinsky’s
formula.
whereas,
Mathematical
constant (π)= 22/7
FML=
Foramen magnum length
FMW=
Foramen magnum width
Variations in Shapes of foramen magnum– The frequency of
distribution of various types of shapes were recorded. (Fig. 3,4,5 & 6).
The same parameters were also be
evaluated in 100 CT Head images by the help of CT Machine Optima 660 GE 3D
reconstruction was done with each slice thickness 0.625 mm.
Statistical Analysis- The data was collected, tabulated
and statistically analyzed using SPSS program and appropriate test was applied.
RESULT- The various parameters of foramen magnum recorded in 50 dry
skulls and 50 CT images were represented in below given Table 1.
Table 1 shows the parameters
of foramen magnum was slightly higher in CT images as compared to dry cadaveric
skull p-value was <0.001, which were statistically significant.
Table 1:
Morphometric data of foramen magnum in CT images of males and females and Dry
cadaveric skull
Parameters |
Dry skull (mm) |
CT Images |
P value |
|
Male (mm) |
Female (mm) |
|||
AP |
34.08±2.25 |
34.95±2.42 |
32.64 ±1.80 |
<0.001 |
TR |
28.17±2.85 |
28.64±2.21 |
26.73±2.50 |
<0.001 |
AREA |
757.41±115.09 |
788.95±95.71 |
681.22±66.97 |
<0.001 |
P-value
(<0.001)= Significant , AP= Antero posterior, TR= Transverse diameter
In our study, Table 2 shows the frequency of distribution of types
of shapes in foramen magnum was oval 58%, hexagonal 10%, pentagonal 4%, round
12%, diamond 16%.
Table 2: Percentage of
occurrence of various shapes of foramen magnum in dry bones and CT images
Shapes |
Dry skull (%) |
CT images |
|
Male |
Female |
||
Oval |
29(58) |
23 |
25 |
Irregular |
0(0) |
01 |
02 |
Hexagonal |
05(10) |
05 |
04 |
Tetragonal |
0(0) |
00 |
00 |
Pentagonal |
02(4) |
07 |
05 |
Round |
06(12) |
12 |
07 |
Diamond |
08(16) |
02 |
07 |
Table 3 shows
that the data obtained from present study was compared with reports from
different authors. According to Mushed et
al. [12], Chethan et al. [13],
Radhakrishan et al. [14] shape were mainly rounded
type while in this study and study was done by Radhika et al. [15] shape was mainly oval type.
Types
of foramen Magnum |
Murshed et al. [12] |
Chethan et al. [13] |
Radhakrishna et al. [14]
|
Radhika et al. [15] |
Present Study |
Oval |
9(8.1%) |
8(15.1%) |
39(39%) |
60(40%) |
29(58%) |
Round |
24(21.8%) |
12(22.6%) |
28(28%) |
30(20%) |
6(12%) |
Tetragonal |
14(12.7%) |
10(18.9%) |
19(19%) |
9(6%) |
- |
Hexagonal |
19(17.2%) |
3(5.6%) |
- |
9(6%) |
5(10%) |
Irregular |
22(19.9%) |
8(15.1%) |
- |
24(16%) |
- |
Pentagonal |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2(4%) |
Diamond |
- |
- |
- |
- |
8(16%) |
Table 4 shows that the data obtained
from present study was compared with reports from different authors. The
measurement of antero-posterior dimension and
transverse dimensions were same as done by Borelli et al. [16], Kanchan et al. [17]; Santosh et al. [18].
Previous
studies (Year) |
Antero-posterior
diameter (mm) |
Transverse
Diameter (mm) |
Murshed et
al. [12] |
35.9 |
30.45 |
Borelli et
al.[16] |
34.08 |
28.01 |
Gapert et
al. [2] |
35.91 |
30.51 |
Suazo et al. [6] |
36.05 |
30.05 |
Chethan et al. [13] |
31 |
25.2 |
Radhakrishna et al. [14] |
34.04 |
28.63 |
Kanchan et al. [17] |
34.51 |
28.98 |
Santhosh et al. [18] |
34.37 |
28.98 |
Radhika et al. [15] |
35.3 |
29.4 |
Kumar et al. [11] |
36.78 |
30.05 |
Present study (2018) |
34.08 |
28.17 |
Authors
(Year) |
Foramen magnum area (mm2) |
Murshed et
al. [12] |
931.7 |
Acer et al. [21] |
760 |
Gapert et
al. [2] |
862.41 |
Ukoha et al. [23] |
857 |
Singh and Talwar[20] |
733 |
Shepur et al. [19] |
748.6 |
Kumar et al. [11] |
876.88 |
Present study (2018) |
757.41 |
DISCUSSION- Foramen magnum is a
passage between the cranial cavity and vertebral canal. It is formed by the
interaction of bony ligaments and muscular structures forming the complex
cranio vertebral junction. Bony parameter of foramen magnum is needed for
transcondylar approach. Morphometric dimensions of foramen magnum also have an
etiological significance in herniation of cerebellar tonsil, in various
intracranial surgical approaches, to identify fire victims in forensic
medicines Understanding the importance of foramen magnum the findings of the
present study were compared with previous studies. In our study of foramen
magnum, the mean antero-posterior and transverse diameters in 50 skulls were
34.08±2.25 mm and 28.17±2.85 mm similar to study on Brazilian skulls, which
also shows that the mean antero-posterior diameter was 35.22±3.3 mm and the
mean transverse diameter was 30.3±2.0 mm [22]. Our morphometric
study of foramen magnum showed slightly fewer dimensions than the study done on
100 Nigerian skulls in 2011, which showed
a mean Antero-posterior diameter of 36.2±2.3 mm and a transverse diameter of
30.0±2.5 mm [23]. This results show variations in our studied due to
racial differentiation. Various other morphometric measurement of
foramen magnum also revealed that antero posterior diameter is more than the
transverse diameter as in our study. The measurement of antero-posterior and
transverse diameter in our study were same as previous studies done by Borelli et al.
[16], Kanchan et al. [17]; Santosh et al. [18].
Measurement of an area on
foramen magnum in our study is 757.41 mm2 which was similar to
morphometric previous study done by Shepur
et al. [19],
Singh and Talwar [20]
and Acer et al. [21]. Uthman et al. [24]
also reported that foramen magnum area was the best discriminant parameter for
sex determination with accuracy of 69.3%. Foramen magnum undergoes various
evolutionary changes due to its different osteological features [25].
There were great variations in morphological shapes of foramen magnum. The
morphological variations of the foramen magnum found in our study were oval
(48%), rounded (19%), hexagonal (9%), pentagonal (12%), diamond (9%) and
irregular (3%) shapes. Radhika et al. [15] also observed
oval as main type 64% while it is tetragonal in other studies. Knowledge of
this morphological shape is very important as for surgeons as it is difficult
to explore anterior portion of foramen magnum in ovoid type [26]. In some other study of
Mushed et al. [12], Chetan et al. [13], Radhakrishan et al. [14] the round shape is commonly observed. A study done on
CT images by Edril et al.
[27]
showed CT images parameters are higher in males as compared to females
similar to our findings. This type of prospective
studies gives a morphometric references to various types of foramen magnum in
Indian population, as there is a great variations regarding literature
available on the morphological dimensions of foramen magnum.
CONCLUSIONS- The morphometric knowledge
regarding foramen magnum is very important for various surgical procedures of
posterior cranial fossa. This type of morphometric study gives us significant
parameters to determine feasibility of transcondylar approaches to prevent
complications like hemorrhage and injury to vital structures.
Studies of foramen magnum
in skull is very important in various field due to its great clinical
significance but the available data is scanty and is at variance with one
another so additional studies are required to form some standard
parameters.
CONTRIBUTION
OF AUTHORS
Research
concept- Dr. Pratishtha
Potdar
Research
design- Dr. Arjun
Kumar
Supervision- Dr. Kuldeep Singh
Materials- Dr. Arjun Kumar
Data
collection- Dr. Jagmohan
Singh Dhakar
Data analysis
and Interpretation- Dr. Arjun
Kumar
Literature
search- Dr. Jagmohan
Singh Dhakar
Writing
article- Dr. Pratishtha
Potdar
Critical review- Dr. Kuldeep Singh
Article
editing- Dr. Pratishtha
Potdar
Final approval- Dr. Kuldeep Singh
REFERENCES
1.
Standring
S. Gray’s anatomy. The anatomical basis of clinical practice. 39th ed. London: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone;
2005: 460.
2.
Gapert
R, Black S, Last J. Sex determination from foramen magnum. Int. J. Legal Medicine,
2008; 123(1): 25-33.
3. Faruqi N. A Human osteology.
Chapter 40. 2nd edition CBS publishers and Distributors Pvt. ltd,
2011; pp. 396-428.
4. Kanodia G,
Parihar V, Yadav R, Bhatele R, Sharma D. Morphometric analysis of posterior
fossa and foramen magnum. J. Neurosci. Rural Pract., 2012; 3(3): 261-66.
5. Kanchan T, Gupta A,
Krishan K. Craniometric analysis of foramen magnum for estimation of sex. Int. J. Med. Health, Biomed. Pharm.
Eng., 2013; 7(7): 111-13.
6. Suazo G, Russo P, Zavando
M, Smith RL. Sexual dimorphism in the foramen magnum dimensions. Int. J. Morphol.,
2009; 27(1): 21-23.
7. Edwards K, Viner MD,
Schweitzer W, Thali MJ. Sex determination from the foramen magnum. J. Forensic
Radiol. Imaging, 2013; 1(4): 186-92.
8. Patel R, Mehta CD.
Morphometric study of foramen magnum at the base of human skull in South
Gujrat. J. Dental Med. Sci., 2014; 13(6): 23-25.
9. Howale DS, Bathija A,
Gupta S, Pandit D. Correlation between cranial index and foramen magnum index
in human dried skulls. Glob. J. Res. Anal., 2014; 3(1): 03-06.
10. Singh
P, Oberoi S,Gorea R, Kapila A. Age Estimation in old individuals by CT scan of Skull. J. Indian Acad.
Forensic Med., 2004; 26(1): 1-4.
11. Kumar A, Dave M, Anwar S.
Morphometric evaluation of foramen magnum in dry human skulls. Int. J. Anat. Res., 2015, 3(2): 1015-23.
12. Murshed KA, Emine A, Tuncer
I. Morphometric evaluation of the foramen magnum and variations in its shape: a
study of CT images of normal adults. Turk. J. Sci., 2003; 33: 301-06.
13.
Chethan P, Prakash JA, Murlimanju BV, Prashanth KV. Morphological analysis and
morphometry of the foramen magnum: an anatomical investigation. Turkish
Neurosurg., 2012; 22(4): 416-19.
14.
Radhakrishna SK, Shivarama CH, Ramakrishna A, Bhagya
B. Morphometric analysis of foramen magnum for sex determination in south
Indian population. Nitte
Univ. J. Heal. Sci., 2012;
2(1): 20-22.
15. Radhika PM, Shetty S,
Prathap KJ, Sheshgiri C, Jyothi KC. Morphometric study of the foramen magnum in
adult human skulls in Indian population. Asian J. Med. Clin. Sci., 2014; 3 (2):
68-72.
16. Borelli D, Melo NS, Lima RS.
Morphometry and spatial correlation of the foramen magnum and spinal cord through MRI. J. Morphol. Sci., 2012; 29(2):
87-90.
17. Kanchan T, Attiku Y, Dixit PN, Kotian MS. Sex estimation from foramen magnum dimensions in an Indian population. Journal of forensic and legal medicine.2012; 19: 162-67.
18. Santosh CS, Vishwanathan KG, Gupta A, Siddesh RC, Tejas J. Morphometry of the Foramen Magnum: An Important Tool in Sex Determination. J. Med. Health Sci., 2013; 4(2): 88-91.
19.
Shepur
MP, Magi M, Nanjundappa B, Havaldar PP, Gogi P, et al. Morphometric analysis of
foramen magnum. Int. J. Anat. Res., 2014; 2(1): 249-55.
20.
Singh
G, Talwar I. Morphometric analysis of foramen magnum in human skull for sex
determination. Hum. Bio. Rev., 2013; 2(1): 29-41.
21.
Acer
N, Sahin B, Ekinci N, Ergur H, Basaloglu H. Relation between intracranial
volume and the surface area of the foramen magnum. J. Cranio Fac. Surg., 2006;
17: 326–30.
22. Manoel C, Prado FB, Caria
PHF, Groppo FC. Morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum in human skulls of
brazilian individuals.
Its relation to gender. Braz. J. Morphol. Sci, 2009; 26(2): 104-08.
23.
Ukoha
U, Egwu O, Okafor I, Anyabolu A,Ndukwe G, et al. Sexual Dimorphism in the Foramen Magnum of Nigerian Adult. Int. J.
Biol. Med. Res., 2011; 2(4): 878-81.
24.
Uthman
AT, Rawi NA Timini JA. Evaluation of foramen magnum gender determination using
helical CT scanning. Dento. Maxillofacial. Radiol., 2012; 14: 197-202.
25.
Sarthak J, Batham IK. Evaluation of
foramen magnum in gender determination using helical CT scanning in Gwalior
population.
Int. J. Med. Res. Rev., 2016; 4(3): 357-60.
26.
Nevell
L, Wood B. Cranial base evolution within the hominin clade. J. Anat, 2008; 212;
455-68.
27.
Edril
FH, Saban V, Cimen M, Isik O. Morphometric Evaluation of the foramen magnum by
CT. Ericyes Med. J., 2010; 32(3): 167-70.