Research Article (Open access) |
---|
Int. J. Life. Sci. Scienti. Res., 4(2): 1670-1674, March
2018
Rapid Composting of Different Wastes with Yash
Activator Plus
Mohammad Hafeez1*, Pramila Gupta2,
Yash Pal Gupta3
1Microbiologist,
Yash Krishi Takniki Evam Vigyan Kendra, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
2Secretarty,
Yash Krishi Takniki Evam Vigyan Kendra, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
3Chairman, Yash
Krishi Takniki Evam Vigyan Kendra, Allahabad, Uttar
Pradesh, India
*Address for Correspondence: Mr.
Mohammad Hafeez, Microbiologist, Yash Krishi Takniki Evam Vigyan
Kendra, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
ABSTRACT- Microbial
composting play an important role in the recycling of different processing
wastes and the compost generated by bio-conversion of wastes offers several
benefits such as enhanced soil fertility and soil health that can lead to
increased agricultural productivity, improved soil biodiversity, reduced
ecological risks and a healthier environment. The present experiment was
conducted in Plastic pots, which were filled with the different wastes, namely
Sugarcane waste, Plants waste, Flower waste, Mausmi waste and Mixed waste,
which was inoculated by Yash Activator Plus (2% w/w) with a set control pot of
each. The results of this study revealed that with Yash Activator Plus, the
temperature was increased rapidly at 20 days of composting which were 50, 52,
58, 54 and 54˚C. Control treatments increased temperature up to 45, 44,
48, 46 and 46˚C respectively. The total loss of dry matter content at the
end of composting amounted to be 37.73, 39.67, 52.94, 51.25 and 40% from
the initial amount of Sugarcane waste, Plants waste, Flower waste, Mausmi waste
and Mixed waste respectively. The maximum and minimum dry matter contents were
decreased in flower waste and sugarcane waste respectively. Increased
temperature enhanced the process of composting rapidly due to the thermophilic
microorganisms, which reduces the time of composting. On the basis of this
study, we can conclude that the mixed consortia of mesophilic and thermophilic
microorganisms increased the process of composting, which reduces the time of
degradation of different wastes.
Key words: Compost, Microbial composting, Different waste, Yash Activator
Plus
INTRODUCTION-
"Yash Activator Plus" is a very effective
microbial consortium for rapid composting. It is a mixture of
culture of mesophilic and thermophilic microorganisms specifically for
accelerating the composting of organic waste. It contains cultures of Bacteria
and fungi along with enzymes, which facilitate bio conversion of organic waste
into a stabilized end product called “compost. Use of this microbial consortium for rapid composting: The
microbiology of composting is very complex. It involves consortium of fungi and
bacteria Actinomyces for bio-conversion of organic waste into end product for
various uses. Microbial growth in composting depends upon so many factors.
Carbon and nitrogen sources are the most critical in terms of bio-degradability
of the waste/ biomass. Microbial
composting refers to microbiological process which converts waste
materials into organic manure, which are rich in plant nutrients and humus [1]. Aeration and
moisture control are the main key operating parameters for operating the
windrow compost plant. Addition of specialized bio-culture consortium is
proposed for increasing composting activity has great use.
Microbial
composting gets advantages not only by reducing the volumes of waste materials
but also by recycling of nutrients and organic matter to improve the soils.
Aerobic decomposition process also generates fewer greenhouse gases as compared
to land filling. Thermophilic composting associated with disadvantages of long
duration process by which loss of the nutrient occurs during the process and it
needed frequent turning to maintain aerobic.
Microbial populations are the active
components of biodegradation processes and conversion during composting. Thus,
compost quality is directly related to the composition and sequence of
microbial communities in the process, being the fungi and bacteria that perform
the degradation of organic matter [2].
Composting of agricultural waste is an alternative trail to alleviate the
negative impact of its accumulation and/or avoid the environmental pollution.
Abou et al. [3]
concluded that recycling agriculture wastes is a must for environment as well
as economical saving. This recycling will not only increase agricultural production but also will
improve its quality. Composting is considered a biological process in which
microorganisms convert organic residues into soil-like material called compost.
El-Haggar et al. [4] and Geisel [5] reported windrows composting is a commonly
used processing method. The microbial decomposition of organic wastes is
controlled by environmental factors affecting microbial activity within the
windrow piles. There are some factors affecting composting and directly
influence the rate of decomposition, such as particle size, moisture content,
aeration, temperature, C/N ratio and pH. Therefore, intensive management of the
composting process by turning and moisture addition is likely to affect the N
fertilizer value of the mature compost.
Microbial
inoculation of compostable material could allow the inoculated microorganisms
like (Streptomyces aurefaciens, Trichoderma viride, Trichoderma
harzianum, Thermomyces lanuginosus, Aspergillus niger, Bacillus subtilis,
Bacillus sphaericus, B. licheniformis, Bacillus stearothermophilus) to dominate over the
indigenous micro-biota and successfully develop appropriate degradation [6].
The important advantages of composting are the reduction of the wastes, the
destruction of weed seeds and of pathogenic microorganisms [7].
Additional benefits of composting as mechanism for waste management are
production of valuable soil amendments, low operation costs, easy to be applied
in most of developing countries, and encouragement of environmentally friendly
practices such as reduction of the emission of greenhouse gases, promote the
efficiency of fertilizer application [8].
Microbial composting technologies for agriculture and other waste management
are very significant to meet the need of developing countries. Therefore, the
present work aims to rapid composting of agricultural and other wastes through
the microbial composting process using Yash
Activator Plus.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
Place
of work- The
present study was conducted in the Yash Krishi Takniki
Evam Vigyan Kendra, Allahabad, Uttar
Pradesh, India in the duration of 2017.
Experimental
details- The experiment was conducted in Plastic pots, which
were filled with the different wastes, namely Sugarcane waste, Plant waste,
Flower waste, Mausmi waste and Mixed waste with a set of control pot and 3
replicates of each. All the weighted amount of wastes were inoculated with the
Yash Activator plus, which are a mixed culture of Mesophilic and Thermophilic
microbial consortia. Inoculum cultures were inoculated with the rate of 2% w/w.
The moisture content was maintained at 50-60% and turning of material at one
week interval for proper aeration were achieved. The data was taken before and
after inoculation of cultures at the interval of 20 days up to 60 days. The
data were recorded during the course of study at an appropriate time interval.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION- Composting
generally take place within two temperatures ranges known as mesophilic (10-40⁰C)
and thermophilic (over 40⁰C). Although
mesophilic temperatures allow effective composting, experts suggest maintaining
temperatures between 43⁰C and 65⁰C.
The thermophilic composting is desirable, because they destroy more pathogens,
weed seeds and fly larvae in the composting materials. The experimental results
showed that the temperature of the waste materials before inoculation was 34,
35, 37, 35 and 35 ˚C namely Sugarcane waste, Plant waste, Flower waste,
Mausmi waste and Mixed waste respectively. Temperature variations during the
composting process are shown in Table 1. The data obtained at 20
days of inoculation with Yash Activator Plus the temperature were increased
rapidly at 20 days of composting which were 50, 52, 58, 54 and 54˚C with
comparison to controls which were 45, 44, 48, 46, and 46˚C respectively.
The temperature of composting decreased slowly at 47, 48, 55, 51 and 50˚C
respectively at 40 days of composting and at 60 days almost the temperature
were stabilized, which were 35, 36, 37, 35 and 36˚C with comparison to
controls which were 37, 38, 40, 38 and 37˚C respectively. Temperature,
which is an important factor in composting process, its influences
on the activity and diversity of microorganisms [9].
Liang et al. [10]
reported that the enhancement of microbial activities was induced by increasing
temperature.
Table
1: Temperature variations during the composting process of different waste
materials
Waste
materials |
Temperature variations (˚C) |
||||||
Before
Inoculation |
At 20 days |
At 40 days |
At 60 days |
||||
Control |
Treated |
Control |
Treated |
Control |
Treated |
||
Sugarcane
waste |
34.0 |
45.0 |
50.0 |
42.0 |
47.0 |
37.0 |
35.0 |
Plant waste |
35.0 |
44.0 |
52.0 |
42.0 |
48.0 |
38.0 |
36.0 |
Flower waste |
37.0 |
48.0 |
58.0 |
45.0 |
55.0 |
40.0 |
37.0 |
Mausmi waste |
35.0 |
46.0 |
54.0 |
44.0 |
51.0 |
38.0 |
35.0 |
Mixed Waste |
35.0 |
46.0 |
54.0 |
43.0 |
50.0 |
37.0 |
36.0 |
The results indicate that the maximum temperature
increased in flower waste which was 58˚C at 20 days of composting this increased
temperature rapidly and enhanced the composting process in comparison to
natural composting. This rising of temperature during composting was due to the
microorganism activity in the waste. Kanotra
S and Mathur [11] reported
that fungi, bacteria, and actinomycetes play unique and important roles during
the composting, mixed cultures of microorganisms enhanced the rate of
lignocelluloses degradation, due to their synergistic activity through
utilization of intermediate degradation products. The results can be correlated with the findings of El-Meniawy [12];
Abdel-Aziz and Al-Barakah [13]; Eida [14].
The maturity of composting stage was started with the temperature decreased to normal air daily temperature and remains almost constant with turning of the piles [15].
Therefore, this is considered as
a good indicator for the end of
the biodegradation phase in which the compost
achieves maturity [16]. The decrease in temperature after
peak value was related to the
decrease in microbial as well as enzymatic activities. The results are with the agreements of Noguerira
et al. [17]
study.
Fig. 1: Different waste
materials before inoculation of Yash Activator Plus
Dry matter content results of the
different wastes treatments showed
that there are decreased gradually during the whole period of composting, which is shown in Table 2. The initial amounts of different waste were
2650, 3000, 3400, 4000 and 3200 gm respectively. The maximum reductions of dry
matter are achieved at 20 days data of composting stage, which was
characterized by the maximum microbial activity. The total loss of dry
matter content at the end of composting amounted to be 37.73, 39.67, 52.94, 51.25 and 40% from the initial
amount, which are Sugarcane
waste, Plant waste, Flower waste, Mausmi waste and Mixed waste respectively.
The maximum and minimum dry matter content was decreased in flower waste and
sugarcane waste, which were
52.94 and 37.73 % respectively. These results
can be correlated with those of Wallace [18] and Kuok et al. [19]. The turning effects on
the microbial consortia during the composting enhanced the degradation of
organic matter by transferring
the undamaged organics at unfavorable temperatures to favorable temperatures,
to allow degradation by microorganisms that degrade more vigorously reported by
Kuok et al. [19].
Table
2: Effect of Yash Activator plus on dry matter of different waste materials
during composting
Waste
materials |
Weight of the dry matter (gm) |
||||||
Before
Inoculation |
At 20 days |
At 40 days |
At 60 days |
||||
Control |
Treated |
Control |
Treated |
Control |
Treated |
||
Sugarcane
waste |
2,650 |
2,313 |
2,005 |
2,050 |
1,830 |
1905 |
1,650 |
Plant waste |
3,000 |
2,410 |
2,205 |
2,235 |
2,005 |
2,150 |
1,810 |
Flower waste |
3,400 |
2,000 |
1,742 |
1,860 |
1,645 |
1,860 |
1,600 |
Mausmi waste |
4,000 |
2,610 |
2,400 |
2,330 |
2,130 |
2,220 |
1,950 |
Mixed Waste |
3,200 |
2,660 |
2,260 |
2,440 |
2,165 |
2,220 |
1,920 |
Fig.
2: Different waste materials after composting with Yash Activator Plus at 60
days
CONCLUSIONS-
The
main objective of the research included the characterization and study of the
wastes generated in daily life. We could get an idea that the main constituent
in the waste was the biodegradable fraction which included the Flower, Mausmi,
market wastes like raw fruits, vegetables, leaves etc. thereby making it ideal
for utilizing for composting rather than the land spreading utilized in the
dump yard. The present experimental
results indicate that the rapid degradation of different wastes treated
with Yash Activator Plus compared to control treatments. This may be due to the
increase of microorganism's activity in biodegradation and more effective way
of biodegradation of waste. Our results showed that the microbial consortium
offered a faster medium of treatment or recycling where results were obtained
in a span of 60 days.
REFERENCES
1.
Sharma S, Mathur RC, and Vasudevan P.
Composting silkworm culture waste. Compost Sci Util, 1999; 7:74-81.
2.
Palm CA, Gachengo CN, Delve RJ, Cadisch G, and Giller KE.
Organic inputs for soil fertility management in tropical agroecosystems:
Application of an organic resource database. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environement, 2004; 83:27-42.
3.
Abou Hussein ShD, and Sawan M. The
Utilization of Agricultural Waste as the Environmental Issues in Egypt (A Case
Study). J. of Applied Sci. Res., 2010; 6(8):1116-1124.
4.
El-Haggar SM, Mounir G, and Gennaro L.
Agricultural waste as an energy source indeveloping countries, a case study in
Egypt on the utilization of agricultural waste through complexes. International
Centre for Science and High Technology (ICS).United Nations Industrial
Development organization (UNODO), 2004; pp: 1-10.
5.
Geisel PM. Compost in a Hurry. Compost
in Hurry University of California, Agriculture and neutral recourses, 2001;
8037:1-4.
6.
Badr El-Din, SMS, Attia M, and Abo-
Sedera SA. Field assessment of composts produced by highly effective
cellulolytic microorganisms. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 2000; 32:35 -40.
7.
Bernal MP, Albur querque JA, and Moral
R. Composting of animal manures and hemical criteria for compost maturity
assessment. A review Bioresource Technol. 2009; 100: 5444-5453.
8.
Hoornweg DL, Thomas and Otten.
Composting and its applicability in developing countries. The International
Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA,
2000.
9.
Finstein MS, Miller FC, and Strom PF.
Waste treatment composting as a controlled system. Biotechnol, 1986; 8:363-398.
10.
Liang C, Das KC, McClendon RW. The
influence of temperature and moisture contents regimes on the aerobic microbial
activity of a biosolids composting blend. Bioresour
Technol, 2003; 86:131-137.
11. Kanotra
S and Mathur RS. Bioresource
Technology, 1994; 47:185-188.
12. El-Meniawy
MA. Microbiological Studies on the Production of Non- Traditional Animal Feed
from Agricultural wastes. M. Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Al- Azhar
University, Cairo, Egypt, 2003.
13.
Abdel-Aziz RA, and Al-Barakah FN.
Composting technology and impact of compost on soil biochemical properties.
Arab Gulf J. Scientific Res. 2005; 23(2):80-91.
14.
Eida MF. Application of biological
farming principals for producing safe vegetable crops. M. Sc. Thesis, Faculty
of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, 2007.
15.
Harada Y, Inoko A, Tadaki, M, and Izawa
T. Maturity process of city refuse compost during piling. Soil Sci. and Plant
Nutr., 1981; 27:357-364.
16.
Jimenez El and Garcia VP. Evaluation of
city refuse compost during piling. Biological Wastes, 1989; 27:55-142.
17.
Noguerira WA, Nogueira FN, and Devens
DC. Temperature and pH control in composting of coffee and agricultural wastes.
Water Sci. and Technol., 1999; 40 (1):113-119.
18.
Wallace, PA. Compost Use in Agriculture,
EB Nationwide, 2003.
19.
Kuok F, Mimoto H, and Nakasaki K.
Effects of turning on the microbial consortia and the in situ temperature
preferences of microorganisms in a laboratory-scale swine manure composting.
Bioresour Technol, 2012; 16: 421-427.