Research Article (Open access) |
---|
Int. J. Life. Sci. Scienti. Res., 4(2): 1639-1643, March 2018
Studies on Population Characteristics of
Frigate tuna, Auxis thazard (Lacepede, 1800) Occurring in the North West Coast of India
Vinod Kumar Mudumala*, Mahesh Kumar Farejiya
, Kiran S. Mali, Rama Rao
Karri, D.E. Uikey,
Pradnya A. Sawant, A. Siva
*Asst. Professr, Department of Zoology, Govt. PG & Degree
college, Jammikunta, Satavahana
Univerity, Karimnagar, Telangana State, India
*Address
for Correspondence: Mr.
Ashwini G. Darokar,
Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, IGGMC, Nagpur, India
ABSTRACT- This study is an attempt to understand the
population characteristics such as Length-weight relationships, age, growth,
mortality, length at age and exploitation rate of Frigate tuna, Auxis thazard
occurring in the North west coast of India. The data collected from various
fish landing centers from 2008 to 2012 were considered for this study. The mean
fork length and weight 32.35 cm and 1.040 kg was observed respectively. The
length-weight relationship W=2.4321x10-1 FL 2.27658, and r2 0.9576 was
obtained. The value of ‘b’ found to be less than 3 and hence this species is
showing negative allometric growth. The growth
parameters on von Bertalanffy for L∞ estimated
as 47.03, K was 1.30 and to was -0.23. The Phi-prime value (⏀) of 3.33 was derived. The length at age observed at
the end of 1 to 4 years was 27.0, 42.0, 50.0 and 55.0 cm year-1 respectively.
The natural mortality (M) 1.00 year-1, total mortality (Z) of 4.43 year-1 and
fishing mortality (F) 3.43 year-1 were derived with the mean temperature of
27°C. The exploitation ratio (E) and exploitation rate (U) was 0.77. The
results derived in the present study with regard to population characteristics
of frigate tuna in the coastal waters of North west coast of India indicate
catching of this species in the area to be minimized.
Keywords: Length-weight relationships, Mortality, Length at
age, Exploitation ratio, Exploitation rate
INTRODUCTION: Among the neritic tunas occurring in the
Indian waters, under the genus Auxis,
two species viz., Auxis thazard and Auxis rochei are contributing to the
marine fish landings to the tune of 13,418 tonnes
during 2016 [1]. An increase of 64% of these
species landings has been observed when compared to 2015 (8,176 t).
Determinations of population characteristics are vital for understanding
changing trends in the marine fish production and also to evaluate the level of
exploitation. The effective fisheries management depends on the fish catch
data, biological information and population characteristics etc. As per the
literature, the developed countries in the world observed to conduct regular
stock assessments for the major commercial fisheries, thereby, the resources
are better managed. Commendable works on this species have been attempted by
various researchers from the Philippines waters, Indonesia, Taiwan, Sri Lanka
and Thailand. The works of Ingles and Pauly [2] on the growth, mortality and
recruitment of Philippines fishes, Yesaki [3-4] on biological & environmental
observations from the West Coast of Thailand and age and growth of Kawa kawa, longtail
tuna and frigate tuna from the gulf of Thailand, Dwinpongo
et al. [5] on the growth,
mortality and recruitment of commercially important fishes in Indonesian waters,
Lu et al. [6] on the
growth and mortality of Auxis thazard
in the Taiwan Strait and its adjacent seas, Yesaki
and Arce [7] on review on the Auxis
fisheries in Philippines and some aspects of biology of frigate and bullet tuna
in the Indo-Pacific region, Tao et al.
[8] on the age and growth changes and population dynamics of black pomfret and frigate tuna from the Taiwan strait, Geehan and Pierre [9] reviewed the statistical
data of neritic tunas, Hartaty
& Setyadji [10] on the population
parameter of frigate tuna in the Sibolga and adjacent
waters worth to be mentioned. From the Indian waters, these studies are very
limited and the works carried out are pertaining to either entire coast of
India or limited to a coast of the coastal district of maritime states of India
and recent investigations are meagre rather scanty.
Mentioned may be made of the works carried out from Indian waters by Pillai and Ganga [11]
on the fishery and biology of tunas in the Indian seas, Silas et al. [12] on the population dynamics
of tunas and stock assessment, Siraimeetan [13]
on the fishery and bionomics of tunas from Tuticorin
coast, Joseph et al. [14]
on the fishery, age & growth of kawa kawa and frigate tuna, Kasim [15]
on fishery growth, mortality rate and stock assessment of Auxis thazard along Tuticorin coast of
Gulf of Mannar, Jude et al. [16] on the gillnet selectivity studies for
fishing frigate tuna in Tuticorin waters of south
east coast of India, Kasim and Abdussamad
[17] stock assessment of coastal tunas along the east coast of
India, Abdussamad et
al. [18] on Fishery and population characteristics of coastal
tunas at Tuticorin, Ghosh et al. [19] on the fishery,
population characteristics and yield estimates of coastal tunas from Veraval
coast, Ghosh and Shivadas [20] on the fishery, population
dynamics and stock structure of frigate tunas exploited from Indian waters, Abdussamad et al.
[21] on the neritic tuna fishery along the Indian coast, biology and
population characteristics of longtail and frigate
tuna. Monitoring of changes in the population characteristics is very much
essential as the present scenario of the harvested fishery is showing
fluctuating trends. Therefore, regular studies are required to be carried out
and hence this study is an attempt to derive the population parameters of Auxis thazard so as to understand
whether this fishery is overexploited or at the risk of overfishing.
MATERIAL AND METHODS- The fish
samples of Auxis thazard were
collected from the commercial fish landings at Porbandar
in the state of Gujarat, Sassoon Dock and New Ferry Wharf, Mumbai in the state
of Maharashtra, India during 2008-12 (Fig. 1). A total of 924 specimens with
the size ranging between 16 to 50 cm and weight between 0.200-1.880 kg were
considered for this study. The equation W=aLb
was applied to calculate the statistical relationship between length and
weight. In order to understand the degree of association of two variables, the
correlation coefficient was derived from length and weight data. The popular technique of computer analysis of
monthly length frequency distributions, FiSAT-II programme developed by Gayanilo et al., [22] was used for
estimation of growth parameters.
Fig. 1: Study area: North west coast of India
The total mortality (Z) was
derived using Beverton and Holt model [23].
The natural mortality (M) was calculated using regression analysis developed by
Pauly [24] with the average sea surface
temperature 27°C. On estimating the mortality parameters, the exploitation
ratio (E=F/Z) and exploitation rate (U=F/Z*(1-e-z) were calculated.
After deriving the growth parameters, in order to understand the reliability
index, these parameters are evaluated using Phi Prime Test (⏀) developed by Munro & Pauly[25] and Pauly
& Munro[26] using the equation lnK +
2*lnL∞.
RESULTS
Length weight relationship- Length
weight relationship calculated for Auxis
thazard was W=2.4321x10-1 FL2.27658 wherein, the
value of ‘b’ is less than 3 indicating negative allometric
growth. The reason for less ‘b’ value might be due to an absence of juveniles.
The coefficient of determination ‘r2’ value was
0.96 indicating a high degree of correlation and better fit of length weight
relationship (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2: Length-weight
relationship for Auxis thazard
Growth parameters- The values of growth parameters derived are 47.38 cm, 1.35 and -0.23 for
L∞, K, and to respectively. The length at an age at the end of
1-4 years was 26.5, 41.7, 50, and 55Cm per year respectively (Fig.
3). The growth performance index based
on Phi prime test (⏀) was observed as 3.48. The value of Phi
prime is not showing any significant difference.
Fig. 3: Length at age for Auxis thazard
Mortality, exploitation
rate and exploitation ratio- The total mortality (Z) calculated as 4.43 year-1 while the
natural mortality was 1.00 year-1. The fishing mortality (F)
obtained was 3.43. The exploitation ratio (E) and exploitation rate (U) were
estimated at 0.77 year-1 which is relatively high, indicating the
sign of overexploitation. This species assessment
status indicated that, the fishing mortality obtained in the study was 3.43 y-1
which is far higher than the targeted optimum fishing mortality (Fopt) of 0.42 y-1 and limit of
fishing mortality (Flimit=0.58 y-1)
in terms of the biological reference point, thereby, overexploitation of this
species in this region is indicated.
The estimates of growth and mortality
parameters derived in the present study are showing variations in L∞ and
K values with earlier estimates. The range of L∞ is between 47.38
(present study) to 58.00 (Pillai and Ganga, 1985) and the range of K value is from 0.51 (Lu et al., 1991) to
1.35 (present study). These variations in population parameters might be the
difference in selection of samples and method of sampling application of
different methodologies/ techniques. A comparative estimate of growth parameters, mortality rates and
the exploitation ratio of frigate tuna from earlier studies are presented in
Table 1.
Table
1: Comparative estimates of growth parameters, mortality rates and exploitation
ratio of Frigate tunas (Auxis thazard)
L∞
(cm) |
K |
t0 |
M |
Z |
F |
U |
Length
(cm), Age (years) |
Reference |
|||
I |
II |
III |
IV |
||||||||
54.50 |
1.02 |
-0.0118 |
1.53 |
8.83 |
7.30 |
0.80 |
31.4 |
44.5 |
50.0 |
52.3 |
Pillai and Ganga[11] |
58.00 |
0.73 |
-0.0235 |
1.22 |
4.95 |
3.73 |
0.70 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Pillai and Ganga
[11] |
53.75 |
0.98 |
-0.0132 |
1.52 |
5.43 |
3.91 |
0.70 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Pillai and Ganga[11] |
56.50 |
0.95 |
-0.0138 |
1.47 |
1.58 |
0.11 |
0.06 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Pillai and Ganga[11] |
48.44 |
0.51 |
-0.3598 |
0.90 |
1.14 |
0.23 |
0.10 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Lu et al. [6] |
52.90 |
0.82 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
29.0 |
42.0 |
48.0 |
- |
Abdussamad et al. [18] |
46.60 |
0.93 |
-0.0153 |
1.48 |
5.97 |
4.49 |
0.75 |
28.5 |
39.5 |
43.8 |
- |
Ghosh et
al. [19] |
57.95 |
1.20 |
-0.0075 |
1.65 |
3.24 |
4.89 |
0.66 |
40.7 |
52.7 |
- |
- |
Ghosh et
al. [20] |
48.18 |
0.52 |
-0.3319 |
0.91 |
1.31 |
0.40 |
0.20 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Tao et al. [8]
|
47.38 |
1.35 |
-0.2304 |
1.00 |
4.43 |
3.43 |
0.77 |
27.0 |
42.0 |
50.0 |
55.0 |
Present Study |
DISCUSSION- In the length weight
relationship, the ‘b’ value obtained in the present study is less than 3
indicating negative allometric growth. This might be
due to the absence of younger/ juvenile specimens. The K value obtained was
1.35 year-1 and this value is nearer to the value of 1.20 year-1
found by Ghosh et al. [20].
The length at age value at the end of 1-4 years derived as 27.0, 42.0, 50.0, and 55.0 cm year-1 respectively were
comparable to the values calculated by Abdussamad et al., [18]. Growth
performance index (⏀) derived using the
parameters of L∞ and K value was 3.48, which is in confirmation with the
value (3.31) obtained by Ghosh et al., [19]. The natural mortality (M)
was 1.00 year-1, total mortality (Z) was 4.43 year-1 and fishing mortality (F)
was 3.43 year-1 derived which are near to the values obtained by Lu et al., [16] and Pillai and Ganga [11].
From the past five years, the catch trends of Auxis sp. in the Indian
waters have been showing fluctuations. Auxis
thazard fishery was found to be the underexploited resource [18]
during 2005, whereas, in 2010, it showed signs of over-exploitation, where the
exploitation ratio obtained were 0.75 year-1. In the present study the exploitation
ratio of 0.77 year-1 was
derived, thus showing signs of overexploitation which is in agreement
with the studies of Ghosh et al., [19].
Therefore, this study is an attempt to monitor the population parameters
in order to understand the status of exploitation of Auxis thazard in North-West coast of India.
CONCLUSIONS- Management of fisheries is a major concern for sustainable
exploitation with due to consideration of ecosystem and conservation of
biodiversity. In order to meet the management strategies, assessment of fish
stocks and population parameters are crucial. Auxis thazard showed negative allometric
growth and the exploitation ratio indicated signs of overexploitation. The
fishing mortality (F) appears to be high therefore, this fishery needs proper
management advisories. The result of this study provides information on the
changes in the population parameters thereby, useful in sustainable
exploitation of this resource duly considering conservation and management
issues in the North west coast of India.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS- All authors are hightly thankful to the
Fishery Survey of India and the Dept. of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and
Fisheries, Min. of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare for extending constant
support for accomplishing this work.
REFERENCES
1.
CMFRI. Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute,
Cochin, Annual Report, 2016- 17. 2017; 289.
2.
Ingles J, and Pauly, D. An atlas of the growth, mortality and recruitment
of Philippines fishes. ICLARM Technical Report 1985; (13):127.
3.
Yesaki M. Thailand. Biological and Environmental
Observations. A report prepared for the Pole-and-Line Tuna Fishing in Southern
Thailand Project. FAO. FI: DP/THA/77/008: 1982; Field doc. 3,
p. 46.
4.
Yesaki M. Estimates of age and growth of kawakawa (Euthynnus affinis), longtail
tuna (Thunnus tonggol) and
frigate tuna (Auxis thazard) from the
Gulf of Thailand based on length data. IPTP-89-GEN-17- AUG_1, Indo-Pacif, p.
Development Management Programme. 1989.
5.
Dwiponggo A, Hariati T, Banon S, PalJmares ML, and Pauly D.
Growth, mortality and recruitment of commercially important fishes and Penaeid shrimps in Indonesian waters. ICLARM Technical
Reports 17, p. 91. Research Institute for Marine Fisheries, Jakarta, Indonesia
and International Centre for Living Aquatic Resources Management, Manila,
Philippines. 1986.
6.
Lu Z, Quanshui
D, and Youming Y. Growth and mortality of Auxis thazard in the Taiwan Strait and
its adjacent sea. J. Fish. China, 1991; 15(3): 228-235.
7.
Yesaki M and Arce F. A review of the Auxis
fisheries of the Philippines and some aspects of the biology of Frigate (A. thazard) and bullet (A. rochei)
tunas in the Indo-Pacific region. In: Shomura, R.S., Majkowski, J. & Langi, S.
(Eds.) Proceedings of the First FAO Expert Consultation on Interactions of
Pacific Tuna Fisheries, 3-11 December 1991, Noumea,
New Caledonia, FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 336/2, 1994.
8.
Tao Yu, Chen Mingru, Du Jianguo, Lu Zhenbin and Yang Shengyun. Age
and growth changes and population dynamics of the black pomfret
(Parastromateus niger) and
the frigate tuna (Auxis thazard) in
the Taiwan Strait. Department of Oceanography, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res., 2012; 40(3): 649-656.
9.
Geehan J, and Pierre L. Review of the statistical data available for neritic tuna species. IOTC-2015- WPNT-07 Rev 1, 2015; 39.
10. Hartaty H and Setyadji DB. Population parameter of frigate tuna (Auxis thazard) in the Sibolga and Adjacent waters. BAWAL. 2016; 8(3) December
2016: 183-190.
11.
Pillai NGK, and. Ganga U. Fishery and Biology
of Tunas in the Indian Seas. CMFRI, Cochin: 1985; 35.
12.
Silas EG, Pillai PP, Srinath M, Jayaprakash AA, Muthiah C, Balan V, Yohannan T M, Siraimeetan P, et al. Population dynamics of tunas: stock
assessment. In: Silas, E.G. (Ed.), Tuna fisheries of the exclusive economic
zone of India: biology and stock assessments. CMFRI Bulletin 1985; (36):
20-216.
13. Siraimeetan P. Fishery and
bionomics of tunas at Tuticorin. In: Silas, E.G.
(Ed.), Tuna fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone of India: biology and
stock assessments. CMFRI Bulletin 1985;
(36): 86-216.
14. Joseph L, Maldeniya R, and Van der Knaap M. Fishery and age and
growth of kawakawa (E. affinis) and frigate tuna (A. thazard). In: Collective Volume of Working Documents presented
at the Expert Consultation on Stock Assessment of Tunas in the Indian Ocean, Colombo,
Sri Lanka, 4-8 December 1986. Indo-Pacific Tuna Development Management Programme, 1986; (l 2): 113-23.
15. Kasim HM. Fishery, growth,
mortality rates and stock assessment of Auxis
thazard (Lacepede) along Tuticorin
coast, Gulf of Mannar. The Fifth Indian Fisheries
Forum Proceedings, 2002; 17-20 January 2000, Orissa, India.
16. Jude D, Neethiselvan N, Gopalakrishnan P, and Sugumar G.
Gill net selectivity studies for fishing frigate tuna, Auxis thazard Lacepede (Perciformes: Scombridae) in Thoothukkudi waters, southeast coast of India. Indian J.
Mar. Sci., 2002; 31(4): 329-333.
17. Kasim HM, and Abdussamad
EM. Stock assessment of coastal tunas along the east coast of India. In: Somvanshi, V.S., Varghese, S., & Bhargava,
A.K. (Eds.), Proceedings of Tuna Meet-2003, Kochi, 2003; 42–53.
18. Abdussamad EM, Pillai PP, Kasim HM, and Balasubramanian TS.
Fishery and population characteristics of coastal tunas at Tuticorin.
J. Mar. Biol. Ass. India, 2005; 47(1): 50-56.
19. Ghosh S, Pillai
NGK, Dhokia HK. Fishery, population characteristics
and yield estimates of coastal tunas at Veraval.
Indian J. Fish, 2010; 57(2):7-13.
20. Ghosh Shubhadeep, Sivadas M, Abdussamad EM, Rohit Prathibha,
Koya KP. Said, Joshi
KK, Anulekshmi C, et al. Fishery, population
dynamics and stock structure of frigate tuna Auxis thazard (Lacepede,
1800) exploited from Indian waters. Indian J. Fish., 2012; 59 (2):
95-100.
21. Abussamad EM, Koya KP, Rohith P, and Kuriakaose S. Neritic tuna fishery along the Indian coast and biology and
population characteristics of longtail and frigate
tuna. IOTC–2013–WPNT03–18, 2013; 2: 8.
22. Gayanilo FC. Jr, Sparre P, and Pauly D. The FAOICLARM Stock Assessment Tools (FiSAT) User’s Guide. FAO computerized information series (Fisheries).
No. 8. Rome, FAO, 1996; 26.
23. Beverton RHJ and Holt SJ. A
review of methods for estimating mortality rates in exploited rates in
exploited fish populations with special reference to source of bias in catch
sampling. Rapp. P.V. Reun. CIEM, 1956; (140): 67-83.
24. Pauly D. On the
interrelationships between natural mortality, growth parameters and mean
environmental temperature in 175 fish stocks. J. Cons. Int. Explor.
Mer., 1980; 39: 175-192.
25. Munro JL and Pauly D. A
Simple Method for Comparing Growth of Fishes and Invertebrates. ICLARM Fishbyte, 1983; 1:5-6.
26. Pauly D and Munro JL. Once More on the Comparison of Growth in Fish and
Invertebrates. ICLARM Fishbyte, 1984; 2: 21.