Research Article (Open access) |
---|
Int.
J. Life. Sci. Scienti. Res., 4(5): 2025-2036, September 2018
Isolation,
Characterization, and Application of Calcite Producing Bacteria for
Self-Healing Concrete Preparation
Diksha H.
Jokyani1, Dharmvir A. Chouhan2*
1Student,
P. G Department of Microbiology, Dhote Bandhu Science College, Gondia, India
2Assistant
Professor and HOD, P. G Department
of Microbiology, Dhote Bandhu Science College, Gondia, India
*Address for Correspondence: Dr. D.A. Chouhan, Head and
Assistant Professor, P.G Department of Microbiology, Dhote Bandhu Science
College, Kudwa Road Gondia- 441614, Maharashtra, India
ABSTRACT-
Concrete being the foremost building material broadly used in the construction
sector is subjected to crack formation due to low tensile strength, durability,
and ductility. So this issue is of great curiosity to the researchers in
pursuit for the concrete production with better properties. Micro-cracks are
the main reason for structural failure occurs, when the load applied exceeds
its limits. This causes the seepage of water and other salts. In order to
overcome this, the carbonate precipitating, non-pathogenic, spore-forming,
alkaline resistant strain of Bacillus
subtilis has been explored as a bio-cementing material. Cracks in M20 grade
concrete blocks are injected by direct means with screened bacterial strain Bacillus subtilis (BH3) at the cell
concentration of 104, 105, 106 CFU/ml with
silica gel as an immobilizing agent and calcium lactate as a food source. The cracks were allowed to heal for appropriate
time duration at specific pH, temperature, and urea concentration. These
findings suggest the potential of Bacillus
subtilis in an autogenously healing process.
Keywords:
Bacillus subtilis, BH3, Carbonate
precipitation, Crack, Healing and Bio-cementation
INTRODUCTION- A
large amount of non-renewable resource is consumed by the construction
engineering sector, most of which contribute to the highest proportion of
global CO2 emission at their production or application stage. The
concrete production process is an energy-intensive process if in case of
mining, transportation and processing are considered. Its production level lies
at about 2.35 billion metric tonnes per year and contributes an astonishing 10%
of CO2 emission in the atmosphere [1]. Another
issue concerns is the huge maintenance costs for structure built in past. About
10% of the bridges in the USA are considered structurally deficient and 10% of
it is considered functionally obsolete [2]. Apart from
this the factors like freeze-thaw reactions, shrinkage, results in the cracking
of concrete structures during its hardening and this ultimately leads to
structural deformation. Latter the ingress of some hazardous chemicals and
moisture into the concrete may lead to decrement in its serviceability whereas;
the penetration of sulphates and chlorides in cracks causes the durability to
be affected. Hence the more concern should be given to this so as to prevent
the expansion of cracks by a sustainable means that might involve the natural
microbial mechanism of bio-cementation which is promising.
Autonomously healed concrete is nothing
but the biologically produced limestone by which the cracks can be healed
effectively. The screened bacterial strain of genus “Bacillus” along with the
calcium based nutrient like calcium lactate and an immobilizing agent like
silica gel is mixed in appropriate proportion and injected into the preformed
cracks by direct means. In case if it is added initially to the concrete
mixture then the self-healing agent can lie in the dormant stage within the
concrete for up to about 200 years. Due to any of the damage the water starts
to percolate deep into the structure and the dormant bacterial form if get the
growth favourable conditions to acquire its vegetative form and starts to feed
on calcium lactate consuming oxygen and thereby converting soluble calcium
lactate to insoluble calcium carbonate better called limestone. Here the
consumption of oxygen by the bacterial strain is advantageous as oxygen is
responsible for steel corrosion thereby enhancing the durability of steel
structures [3], Since
1980’s several researchers had been working on this concept and had used the
different bacterial strains such as Jonker et
al. [4] used Bacillus
cohnii bacteria to precipitate CaCO3 while Santhosh et al. [5] and Bang et al. [6] used Bacillus pasteurii.
As
the bacterial cell wall is negatively charged, it will draw the cations from
the environment, Ca2+ and deposit it on their cell surface serving
as a nucleation site. [6]
Ca2+
+ Cell ----------------------ŕ Cell- Ca2+ 1
This
bacterial genus is known to have specific urease activity that is utilized for
the hydrolysis of urea into 1 mole of ammonia and 1 mole of carbonic acid [7].
H2N-CO-NH2 + H2O ----------------------ŕ NH3 + H2N-CO-OH 2
H2N-CO-OH
+ H2O ----------------------ŕ NH3 + H2CO3 3
These
two products will subsequently form 2 moles of ammonium and hydroxide ion as,
H2CO3 ----------------------ŕ HCO3- + H+ 4
2NH3
+ 2H2O ----------------------ŕ 2NH4+
+ 2OH- 5
Reaction
4 and 5 in turn will results in pH increase and shifts the equilibrium,
resulting in the carbonate ion formation as,
HCO3-
+ H+ + 2NH4+ + 2OH- ----------------------ŕ CO32- +
2NH4+ + 2H2O 6
The
carbonate formed in reaction 6 will subsequently react with CO32-
ions, leading to CaCO3 precipitation.
Cell- Ca2+ +
CO32- ----------------------ŕ
Cell- CaCO3 7
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Materials
and Chemical used- Soil samples used for isolation of
potent strain were collected from 12 different construction sites across the
Gondia district, India. All the required chemicals in this work were purchased
from Hi-media laboratories, India. The research work was carried out in the P.G
Department of Microbiology, Dhote Bandhu Science College, Gondia, India from
August 2017 to March 2018.
Preparation
and artificial cracking of concrete blocks- The concrete
blocks of M20 grade were first prepared with the mould size of 100 mm x 60 mm
and left for 28 days curing process. Further, the blocks were subjected to
indigenous cracking by plastic shrinkage method (plastic shrinkage cracks
usually ranges between 1 - 2 mm depth) [8].
Determining
Size of cracks- Size of the cracks in concrete block was
measured using scale [9].
Isolation
of new ureolytic bacteria: Soil
samples pasteurized at 800C for 15 minutes then subjected to tenfold
dilution. The 0.2 ml of pasteurised diluted sample was then plated on sterile
urea agar plates with 5% urea concentration. Plates were incubated at 370C
for 24 - 48 hrs and observed the isolated colonies. Pink colour colonies were
selected and further screened based on the capability to degrade urea in
Christensen’s agar medium and to tolerate high alkaline condition based on pH
optimization studies. The single selected potent organism was in turn
identified based on its morphological and biochemical characteristics. Latter
on the identified isolate was pure cultured on urea agar slants and preserved
at low temperature (40C) [10].
Study
on effect of environmental and nutritional condition on urease production a
capability of BH3 strains: Bacillus
subtilis strain with promising result was selected and the
effect of environmental condition like temperature, and nutritional condition
such as urea concentration were characterized. For temperature optimization, 1
ml of overnight growth culture was inoculated in 3 tubes containing urease
broth except the control tube and incubated at 3 different temperature ranges
as 250C, 350C, and 450C then after 24 hours
the tubes were observed for change in colour intensity and biomass was determined
nephlometrically. For urea concentration, optimization purpose 1 ml of
overnight growth culture was inoculated in 3 tubes containing urea in
concentration range of 2%, 5% and 10% except the control tube and incubated at
350C. After 24 hours the tubes were observed for change in colour
intensity and biomass was determined nephlometrically. [11]
Growth
Curve of Bacillus subtilis strains: The growth curve of
screened isolate was determined to set a growth comparison point at optimum
condition. Three ml of overnight growth culture was used to inoculate in 30 ml
of urea broth in 250 ml conical flask then the culture was incubated for 27
hours at 350C, pH 8, and 5% urea concentration. Inoculation time was
considered as zero time and the quantitative determination of growth was
carried out by spectrophotometer at 600 nm.
Simultaneously the viable cell count was determined as a
colony forming units/ml (CFUs) [12]. The desired isolate was purified and
mixed with silica gel in 1: 100 dilution factors with the cell count 104,105,106
cells so as to immobilize the bacterial cells and hence it can remain embedded
for the long time in the concrete matrix. Along with it, calcium lactate is
also added to it with molar mass 218 g/mole that serve as food source for
bacterial cells. As it gets the growth
favourable conditions it will soon start to precipitate CaCO3 and
the bacterial cells will be in turn coated with it resulting in the autogenous
healing [13].
Water
Permeability Test of Concrete- To determine the water
absorption ability of bacterial concrete, this test was carried out in a
comparative manner. For this, the control and bacteria treated concrete blocks
were kept overnight saturated in the saline buffer and weighed. Then both
blocks were dried in the oven at 1000C for 24 hours, cooled and
again weighed. The obtained values were then put into the formula given below
to determine percent water absorption by both the blocks [14].
%
water absorption = WSaturation – WOven Dried /
WOven Dried X 100
Where,
WSaturation
= Weight of block after saturation
WOven
Dried= Weight of block after drying
RESULT-
As
the durability of concrete is affected by the cracks leading to corrosion of
reinforcing bars, the general method of repairing is time consuming and
expensive, so bio based calcite
precipitation has been proposed as an alternative and sustainable, environment
friendly cracks repair technique. The bio agent selected for this purpose was
based on its tolerance to high pH, and continuous formation of dense CaCO3
in the liquid medium. According to analysis and study of blocks by the
visual examination of concrete core, the estimated size of cracks varied from
0.3 to 0.5 mm [9]. Total 12 urease positive Bacillus subtilis strains were isolated from soil sample. Out of these
12 isolates Bacillus subtilis BH3
strain was found to be most potent.
Optimization-
The
optimum temperature required for growth of Bacillus
subtilis was 350C. Table 1 and Fig. 1 shows the optimization of
temperature by using 3 different temperature ranges.
Table 1: Effect
of temperature on growth and urease activity of Bacillus subtilis strain
S. No. |
Bacterial strains |
Temperature range (0C) |
Growth measurement |
Urease
activity |
Interpretation |
OD600 nm |
|||||
1. |
BH3 |
25 |
1.51 |
Color changes to mild pink |
The maximum urease activity with
effective growth was observed at temperature range of 350C |
2. |
35 |
1.52 |
Color changes to intense pink |
||
3. |
45 |
1.519 |
Color changes to light pink |
BH3= Bacillus
subtilis
strain
Fig. 1: Effect
of temperature on growth of Bacillus
subtilis strain
The specific urea concentration
supporting the growth of selected ureolytic bacterial strain (BH3) was 5%. The
Table 2 and Fig. 2 show the effect of urea concentration on the bacterial
growth and urea degrading ability of it.
Table 2: Effect
of urea conc. on growth and urease activity of Bacillus subtilis BH3 strain
S. No. |
Bacterial strains |
Urea concentration |
Growth measurement |
Urease
activity |
Interpretation |
OD600 nm |
|||||
1. |
BH3 |
2% |
0.54 |
Color changes to light pink |
The maximum ureolytic activity
with effective growth was observed at 5% urea concentration |
2. |
BH3 |
5% |
1.75 |
Color changes to Intense pink |
|
3. |
BH3 |
10% |
1.69 |
Color changes to mild pink |
Fig.
2: Effect of urea conc. on growth of Bacillus
subtilis strains
Spectroscopic
growth curve- The growth curve of Bacillus subtilis was elucidated using the partially optimized
condition. Table 3 and Fig. 3 indicate the growth curve of B. subtilis isolates, which is considered as the selected isolate
of this research paper. The maximum OD was seen between 6 to 10 hours and
referred as log phase. Nephlometric reading showed that the cultures reached
the stationary phase after 10 hours. After 24 hours the bacterial growth was
inhibited due to media component depletion and the release of secondary
metabolite that may be toxic to viable cells.
Table 3: Nephlometric absorbance
values to construct growth curve of screened isolate of B. subtilis
Absorbance
at 600 nm |
||||
Time in hours |
Trial 1 |
Trial 2 |
Trial 3 |
Average |
1 |
0.162 |
0.164 |
0.180 |
0.168 |
2 |
0.372 |
0.343 |
0.417 |
0.377 |
3 |
0.651 |
0.621 |
0.682 |
0.651 |
4 |
0.911 |
1.001 |
1.073 |
0.995 |
6 |
1.400 |
1.545 |
1.521 |
1.488 |
8 |
1.618 |
1.647 |
1.690 |
1.651 |
9 |
1.671 |
1.677 |
1.700 |
1.682 |
10 |
1.720 |
1.677 |
1.710 |
1.702 |
11 |
1.723 |
1.694 |
1.721 |
1.712 |
12 |
1.731 |
1.717 |
1.729 |
1.725 |
25 |
1.019 |
1.724 |
0.940 |
1.227 |
26 |
0.911 |
0.853 |
0.848 |
0.870 |
27 |
0.908 |
0.847 |
0.769 |
0.841 |
Fig.
3: Growth curve of screened potent isolate of B. subtilis
Studies
on concrete crack healing potential of BH3 strains- In
this investigation, the 3 concrete blocks, Block 1, Block 2, and Block 3 were
used for autogenous healing by the selected strain of Bacillus subtilis BH3. Block 1 with crack size of 0.45 mm width was
injected with 105 CFU/ ml along with silica gel and calcium lactate
showed the healing of cracks at 21st day of inoculation and the
width of crack was reduced to 0.18 mm.
Similarly
the Block 2 with crack size of 0.52 mm when injected with 106 CFU/ml
showed the efficient healing on 19th day of inoculation, whereas the
Block 3 with crack size 0.48 mm width, when injected with 104 CFU/ml,
showed the healing on 23rd day of inoculation with the reduction in
crack size up to 0.25 mm.
Table 4: Concrete crack healing potential of B. subtilis strain in block 1 (105 cells/ml)
S.
No. |
Date |
Initial
Characteristics |
Final
characteristic (Width) |
Interpretation |
1. |
22nd January |
Grade: M20 Size:100 X 60
mm Curing: 28 days Crack developed by: plastic shrinkage type Width: 0.45 mm |
0.45 mm |
Block 1,
inoculated with the 105 cells/ ml of BH 3 strain, showed the
effective healing within 21 days from the day of inoculation |
2. |
23rd January |
0.45mm |
||
3. |
24th January |
0.44 mm |
||
4. |
25th January |
0.43 mm |
||
5. |
26th January |
0.41 mm |
||
6. |
27th January |
0.4 mm |
||
7. |
28th January |
0.4 mm |
||
8. |
29th January |
0.38 mm |
||
9. |
30th January |
0.37 mm |
||
10. |
31st January |
0.37 mm |
||
11. |
1st February |
0.35mm |
||
12. |
2nd February |
0.34 mm |
||
13. |
3rd February |
0.31 mm |
||
14. |
4th February |
0.28 mm |
||
15. |
5th February |
0.27 mm |
||
16. |
6th February |
0.25 mm |
||
17. |
7th February |
0.23 mm |
||
18 |
8th February |
0.2 mm |
||
19. |
9th February |
0.19 mm |
||
20. |
10th February |
0.19 mm |
||
21. |
11th February |
0.18 mm |
Fig. 4: Crack
healing study in bacteria treated cracked concrete block (Block 1)
Table
5: Concrete crack healing potential
of B. subtilis strains in block 2 (106cells/ml)
S.
No. |
Date |
Block
characteristics |
Final
characteristic (Width) |
Interpretation |
1. |
22nd January |
Grade: M20 Size:100 X 60
mm Curing: 28 days Crack developed by: plastic shrinkage type Width: 0.52 mm |
0.52 mm |
Block 2, inoculated with the 106 cells/ ml of BH 3 strain, showed the
effective healing within 19 days from the day of inoculation |
2. |
23rd January |
0.52 mm |
||
3. |
24th January |
0.52 mm |
||
4. |
25th January |
0.518mm |
||
5. |
26th January |
0.516 mm |
||
6. |
27th January |
0.514 mm |
||
7. |
28th January |
0.51 mm |
||
8. |
29th January |
0.48 mm |
||
9. |
30th January |
0.47 mm |
||
10. |
31st January |
0.47 mm |
||
11. |
1st February |
0.46 mm |
||
12. |
2nd February |
0.44 mm |
||
13. |
3rd February |
0.44 mm |
||
14. |
4th February |
0.4 mm |
||
15. |
5th February |
0.4 mm |
||
16. |
6th February |
0.4 mm |
||
17. |
7th February |
0.39 mm |
||
18. |
8th February |
0.39 mm |
||
19. |
9th February |
0.38 mm |
Fig. 5: Crack healing study in bacteria
treated cracked concrete block (Block 2)
Table
6: Concrete crack healing potential
of B. subtilis strain in block 3 (104cells/ml)
S.
No. |
Date |
Initial
Characteristics |
Final
characteristic (Width) |
Interpretation |
1. |
22nd January |
Grade: M20 Size:100 X 60
mm Curing: 28 days Crack developed by: plastic shrinkage type Width: 0.48 mm |
0.48 mm |
Block 3,
inoculated with the 104 cells/ ml of BH 3 strain, showed the
effective healing within 23 days from the day of inoculation |
2. |
23rd January |
0.48 mm |
||
3. |
24th January |
0.45 mm |
||
4. |
25th January |
0.44 mm |
||
5. |
26th January |
0.43 mm |
||
6. |
27th January |
0.42 mm |
||
7. |
28th January |
0.38 mm |
||
8. |
29th January |
0.38 mm |
||
9. |
30th January |
0.35 mm |
||
10. |
31st January |
0.34 mm |
||
11. |
1st February |
0.3 mm |
||
12. |
2nd February |
0.3 mm |
||
13. |
3rd February |
0.3 mm |
||
14. |
4th February |
0.29 mm |
||
15. |
5th February |
0.29 mm |
||
16. |
6th February |
0.29 mm |
||
17. |
7th February |
0.28 mm |
||
18 |
8th February |
0.28 mm |
||
19. |
9th February |
0.28 mm |
||
20. |
10th February |
0.26 mm |
||
21. |
11th February |
0.26 mm |
||
22. |
12th February |
0.25 mm |
||
23. |
13th February |
0.25 mm |
Fig. 6: Crack healing study in bacteria
treated cracked concrete block (Block 3)
Water absorption test by using saline
buffer- The saline buffer is used
in this research work so as to determine the increased resistance of concrete
block towards the water penetration and this test was conducted at a laboratory
level. According to this test, the normal concrete block had shown the higher
water absorption as compared to the concrete block treated with potent
ureolytic bacterial strain. Table 7 numerically represents the bacterial
influence on the water permeability of blocks.
Table
7: Water saturation test results of bacteria healed cracked concrete
Blocks
No. |
Weight
(Saturation) |
Weight
(Dried) |
%
water absorption |
Block 1 |
192.73 |
183.70 |
4.91% |
Block 2 |
188.05 |
174.80 |
7.58% |
Block 3 |
152.30 |
140.10 |
8.70% |
Control |
131.1 |
119.4 |
9.79% |
DISCUSSION- This study has revealed the BH3 strain of bacterial
species Bacillus subtilis isolated
from commercial construction sites, have the high ureolytic activity and can
tolerate the pH range up to 12, which becomes the primary factor for
bio-cementation. Salmabanu L and
Suthar G [2] stated this genus of endolithic bacteria can resist the
pH range up to 13 and persist for the long duration with efficient ureolytic
activity. The isolated and screened
potent isolate (BH3) was identified phenotypically and biochemically same as
done by Achal et al. [11]
and Cheng et al. [15]
while the species level characterization was achieved by 16s gene
sequencing technique. From the further optimization studies of BH3 strain, it
was clear that it shows the effective urea degrading activity at temperature 350C
with 5% urea concentration. Similar conclusion was given by Steubing [12],
who stated that change in temperature and nutritionally sound components can
also affect the CaCO3 precipitation efficiency by ureolytic
bacteria. Growth curve of this potent strain was determined
nephlometrically that showed the log phase of this strain during initial 6-10
hours and become stationary after 10 hours further reduction in the growth rate
after 24 hours. The cell count in the range 105 CFU/ml when injected
in block 1 with the crack width size of 0.45 mm shows the significant reduction
in crack size upto 0.18 in 21 days after inoculation which was more effective
as compared to other 2 concrete block injected with 106 and 104
CFU/ml cells. A similar finding was reported by Bai
and Varghese
[16] during an
experimental investigation on the strength
properties of fly ash based bacterial concrete.
The bacteria treated concrete block
shows the significant reduction in its water penetration ability compared to
normal concrete block due to the deposition of CaCO3 matrix like
structure around the bacterial cells thereby blocking the pores and inhibiting
the water percolation through it. As
with constant development in the field of civil engineering and increasing CO2
emission, considerable efforts has been devoted to this alternative concept of
bio healing of concrete.
CONCLUSIONS- Our
research paper describes that due to its self-healing abilities, eco-friendly
nature, resistance to water absorption thereby enhancing the strength of
building materials along with prevention of steel corrosion, the microbial
concrete technology had proved to be better than the conventional technologies.
It may also be termed as “Smart Bio Material”. The overall development of
strength in bio-concrete is attributed to significant reduction in water
absorption capability by using potent bacterial strain of Bacillus subtilis immobilized by means of silica gel and
supplemented with calcium lactate as food source. The efficient healing was
shown with 105 cells, in block 1 with the reduction in crack size
from 0.43 mm to 0.29 mm width at 21st day of inoculation.
More exploratory works at large scale
should be undertaken to determine the efficacy of bio cementation for
consolidations of building. To make the process economical, microbial additives
can repaired by industrial growth of cells by employing the products as lactose
mother liquor and corn step liquor as nutrient source. Also, the durability of
bacterial concrete should be studied under the various weathering conditions.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT-
The
author is grateful to P.G. Department of Microbiology, Dhote Bandhu Science
College, India for their help and support in carrying out present study.
Technical assistance and advice was provided by Dr. D. A. Chouhan so I would like to thank him for his encouragement.
CONTRIBUTION OF AUTHORS
Research
concept- Prof. D. A. Chouhan
Research
design- Prof. D. A. Chouhan
Supervision- Prof. D. A. Chouhan
Data
collection- Diksha H. Jokyani
Data
analysis and interpretation- Diksha H. Jokyani
Literature
search- Diksha H. Jokyani
Writing
article- Diksha H. Jokyani,
Prof. D. A. Chouhan
Critical
review- Prof. D. A. Chouhan
Article
editing- Prof. D. A. Chouhan
Final approval-
Prof. D. A. Chouhan
REFERENCES
1.
Jayaraj G, Tapsi M.S. Self-Healing of
Concrete Using Polymer Technique. International Journal of Recent Engineering
and Development, 2017; 2(1): 21-30.
2.
Salmabanu L, Suthar
G. A Review on Self-Healing Concrete. Journal of Civil Engineering Research,
2015; 5(3): 53-58.
3.
Dinesh S, Shanmugapriyan R, Namitha
Sheen ST. A Review on Bacteria-Based Self-Healing Concrete. Imperial Journal of
Interdisciplinary Research, 2017; 3(1): 2454- 1362.
4.
Jonkers HM, Thijssen A, Copuroglu O,
Schalangen. Application of bacteria as self-healing agent for the development
of sustainable concrete. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference
on BioGeo.Civil Engineering, 2008; 36(2): 230-235.
5.
Santhosh K, Ramachandran SK,
Ramakrishnan V, Bang S. Remediation of concrete using microorganisms. American
Concrete Institute Materials Journal, 2001; 98: 3-9.
6.
Bang SS, Galinat JK, Ramakrishnan V. Calcite
precipitation induced by polyurethane-immobilized Bacillus pasteurii. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2001; 287(4):
404-409.
7.
Reinhardt HW, Joo SS. Permeability and
self-healing of cracked concrete as a function of temperature and crack width,
2002; 33: 981-985.
8.
Dick J, De. Windt W, De Graef B, Saveyn
H, Vander Meeren P, De Belie N, Verstraete W. Bio-deposition of a calcium
carbonate layer on degraded limestone by Bacillus species, Biodegradation,
2006; 17(4): 357-367.
9.
Shetty MS.
Concrete Technology theory and practice. Revised ed., India; Schand
publication: 2006; p. 361-362.
10. Sahmaran
M, Keskin SB, Ozerkan G, Yaman IO. Self-healing of mechanically-loaded self
consolidating concretes with high volumes of fly ash. Cement and Concrete
Composites, 2008; 30(10): 872-879.
11. Achal
V, Mukherjee A, Reddy S. Characterization of two urease-producing and
calcifying Bacillus spp. isolated
from cement. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol, 2010; 20(11): 1571–1576.
12. Steubing
P. Isolation of an Unknown Bacterium from Soil. Proceedings of the 14th
Workshop/Conference of the Association for Biology Laboratory Education (ABLE),
1993; p. 240.
13. Kantha
DA, Sathyanarayanan KS, Darshan BS, Raja RB.
Studies on the characterization of Biosealant properties of Bacillus sphaericus. International Journal
of Engineering Science and Technology, 2010; 2(3): 270-277.
14. Irwan
JM, Faisal Alshalif A, Othman N, Anneza LH. Effect of Ureolytic Bacteria on
Compressive strength and Water Permeability on Bio-concrete. International
Conference on Civil, Architectural, Structural and Construction Engineering,
2015.
15. Cheng
L, Cord-Ruwisch R. In situ soil cementation with ureolytic bacteria by surface
percolation. Ecological Engineering, 2012; 42: 64-72.
16. Bai
CP, Varghese S. An experimental investigation on the strength properties of fly ash based bacterial
concrete. International Journal of Innovative Research in Advanced Engineering,
2014; 3(8): 64-69.