Review Article (Open access) |
---|
Int. J. Life. Sci. Scienti. Res., 4(1):
1527-1530,
January 2018
Efficacy of Aquatic Plants for Removal of Heavy Metals
from Wastewater
Vineet
Soni*, Preetpal Kaur
Plant Bioenergetics and Biotechnology Laboratory,
Department of Botany, Mohanlal Sukhadia
University, Udaipur, India
*Address
for Correspondence: Dr.
Vineet Soni, Asst.
Professor, Department of Botany, Mohanlal
Sukhadia University, Udaipur, India
ABSTRACT-
Wastewater treatment is a problem of grave concern in most developing
countries. In the last two decades, there has been a lot of research to develop
appropriate technologies to alleviate pollution in water resources. Efficient
wastewater treatments through conventional methods are expensive and difficult
to get optimum results. Currently, phytoremediation is an effective and
affordable solution used to remediate toxic pollutants from aquatic ecosystems.
The review describes various aquatic plants, which have high potential to
remove heavy metals from wastewater.
Key-words- Water pollution, Heavy metals, Phytoremediation, Aquatic plants,
Wastewater treatment
INTRODUCTION- Water pollution by
heavy metal ions is one of the worldwide environmental problems [1]. Heavy
metal pollution due to increased industrialization and urbanization is a global
problem. Toxic heavy metals such as cadmium, copper, lead, chromium, zinc, and
nickel are important environmental pollutants, particularly in areas with high
anthropogenic pressure. They can’t be biodegraded so released into the
environment and contribute to lots of toxic effects even in relatively lower
concentrations on living organisms in food chain [2-6] by
bioaccumulation and bio-magnification [7].
Several methods already used
to clean up the environment from these heavy metals including chemical precipitation, oxidation or
reduction, filtration, ion exchange, reverse osmosis, membrane technology,
evaporation and electrochemical treatment (but most of them are expensive,
time consuming and environmentally destructive [8]. Therefore, it is
essential for a remediation technology to be effective, economic/affordable,
and consistent; moreover, it should effectively reduce HM concentrations to
environmentally acceptable levels, and be applicable to field conditions such
as effluents and aquatic bodies. Currently, phytoremediation of metals is an
effective and affordable “green” technology based on the use of specially
selected metal accumulating plants to remove toxic metals from soils and water.
This environment friendly
technology has aesthetic advantages and long-term applicability. It is a
rapidly developing method that uses plants to reduce, degrade, assimilate and
metabolize environmental pollutants such as heavy metals, hydrocarbons,
pesticides, etc. Phytoremediation techniques do not require specialized
equipment and are accepted by local communities. Plants with exceptional
metal-accumulating capacity are known as hyperaccumulator plants [9].
Phytoremediation utilizes the unique and selective uptake capabilities of plant
root systems, together with the translocation, bioaccumulation, and contaminant
degradation abilities of the entire plant body. Many species of plants have
been successful in absorbing contaminants such as lead, cadmium, chromium,
arsenic, and various radionuclides from soils. As reported by Valipour and Ahn [10],
plant species used for phytoremediation should be possibly native and have a
quick growth rate, extensive root system, high biomass yield, various habitats
adaptation, high tolerance and the ability to accumulate the pollutants in the
aboveground parts. Aquatic macrophytes represent a diverse group of plants with
a great potential for removal heavy metals and are categorized as merged, submerged and free-floating
plants. Presently, over 400 species of plant are identified to have
potential for remediation of water sources [11]. A wide range of
wetland plant species, such as Eichhornia,
Salvinia, water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes), duckweed, Azolla,
Potamogeton, Myriophyllum, Typha, Scirpus, Limnocharis flava, Spartina,
Cyperus and Phragmites are frequently used for the heavy metal
remediation in aquatic system [12- 13]. Different kinds of processes
are used in phytoremediation techniques such as phytoextraction,
phytodegradation, rhizofiltration, phytostabilization, phytovolatilization,
phytodesalination and phytofiltration [14]. According to Thakur et al. [15], among these
methods, phytoextraction, rhizofilteration and phytostabilization are
commercially important. Kumar et al. [16]
investigated seven aquatic plant species: Ipomoea
aquatica, Eichhornia crassipes, Typha
angustata, Echinochloa colonum, Hydrilla verticillata, Nelumbo nucifera and Vallisneria spiralis for
phytoremediation of heavy metal in water. The result showed greatest and lowest
accumulation of heavy metals in N.
nucifera and E. colonum,
respectively.
Aquatic plants for Heavy metal removal
Duckweed
Kingdom : Plantae
Subkingdom :
Tracheobionta
Division :
Magnoliophyta
Class :
Liliopsida
Order : Arales
Family :Lemnaceae
Duckweed, the common name
for four main genera of Lemnaceae: Lemna,
Spirodela, Wolffia and Wolffiella, is the smallest and fastest-growing
flowering plant on the planet. Recently, the Lemna spp. has been proved the
most used plant for phytoremediation in comparison with the other aquatic
macrophytes [17]. This plant is used widely for nutrient recovery of
nitro-gen, phosphorus and toxic metals from domestic and agricultural
wastewater [18-19]. Lemna
minor (Fig. 1) and Lemna gibba have
been used extensively for phytoremediation of heavy metals [20]. L. gibba behaves as bio-indicator for
heavy metals that transfer heavy metals from contaminated site to the plant and
could be used to monitor the transfer of metal from lower to higher trophic
levels [21]. As stated by Bocuk et al. [22], L.
minor accumulate high concentrations
of several metals and metalloids, like nickel, copper, cadmium, zinc,
manganese, boron, uranium and arsenic. Interestingly, Miretzky et al. [23] demonstrated that
dried dead L. minor was able to
remove heavy metals (Zn, Cu, Cd) from contaminated water.
Fig. 1: Collection of L. minor from wastewater accumulated at
Udaipur, India
Giant duckweed (Spirodela polyrhiza) is frequently found growing in rivers,
ponds, lakes, and sloughs (Fig. 2). S. polyrhiza was identified as a good arsenic phytofiltrator
by physicochemical adsorption mechanism [24]. Tang et al. [25] evaluated the influences of a polyculture system of three
duckweed species (Lemna aequinoctialis, Landoltia punctata, and S. polyrhiza) on the removal
efficiency, as compared to a monoculture of duckweed, and majority of polycultures
found to have median removal efficiency as compared to respective monocultures.
Recently L. minor and S.
polyrhiza are considered as an effective bioaccumulator
and sensitive bioindicator for Pb [26]. S. polyrhhiza has been found to uptake and transform DDT and
phosphorus pesticides [27].
According to Chaudhuri et al. [28], L. minor and S.
polyrhiza are potential cadmium accumulator, as they were capable
of removing 42–78% and 52–75% cadmium respectively from media depending upon
initial cadmium concentrations.
Fig. 2: Spirodela polyrhiza
Eichhornia crassipes
Kingdom : Plantae
Division : Magnoliophyta
Class : Liliopsida
Order : Liliales
Family : Pontederiaceae
Genus : Eichhornia
Species : crassipes
E. crassipes, a native of South America, is a major freshwater weed in most of
the frost-free regions of the world and is generally regarded as the most
troublesome aquatic plant. It has been widely planted as water ornamental
around the world because of its striking flowers. Liao and Chang [29]
investigated the ability of water hyacinth to remove cadmium lead, copper,
zinc, and nickel in water. In their investigation, they found water hyacinth
plants high bio-accumulator of these trace elements when grown in water
environments with low concentrations of the five elements. The detected values
of cadmium and lead fall within normal range, while that of cobalt and nickel
were within the critical range. However, zinc and copper showed the highest
accumulation with alarming toxicity levels [16].
Azolla
pinnata
Kingdom : Plantae
Phylum : Pteridophyta
Class : Filicopsida
Family : Azollaceae
Genus : Azolla
Species : pinnata
Azolla pinnata (Fig. 3) is locally
distributed in its native range of Africa and Madagascar, India, Southeast
Asia, China and Japan, Malaysia and the Philippines, the New Guinea mainland
and Australia. A. pinnata spreads rapidly by vegetative growth and can form
dense mats, interfering with boating, fishing and swimming. It can block sunlight
from reaching submerged plants and can also reduce oxygen levels in the water
by blocking the interface between the water surface and the atmosphere. A. pinnata was observed to purify waters polluted by two heavy
metals, i.e., mercury and cadmium under a microcosm condition [30].
The phoyoremediation
potential of A. pinnata has
also been recently observed [31-32].
Fig.
3: Azolla pinnata
forming dense mat over the Roopsagar, Udaipur, India
Potamogeton pectinatus
Kingdom : Plantae
Class :
Liliopsida
Order : Najadales
Family : Potamogetonaceae
Genus : Potamogeton
Species : pectinatus
P. pectinatus is commonly known as sago pondweed, is a submersed plant that
grows from a creeping rhizome. Except for the Polar Regions and Pacific
islands, this species occurs worldwide. Sago pondweed grows in fresh, brackish,
and saline waters throughout the state. It is found in stagnant ponds,
spring-fed rivers, and slow flowing marshes. Underwater stands may look like
grassy meadows. The stems are slender and flexible. The plant has high
capabilities to remove heavy metals (Cd, Pb, Cu, Zn, and Mn) directly from the
contaminated water [33].
Pistia stratiotes
Kingdom : Plantae
Division :
Magnoliophyta
Class :
Liliopsida
Order :
Arales
Family :
Araceae
Genus :
Pistia
Species :
stratiotes
Pistia stratiotes is a free-floating aquatic with feathery roots
that can reach up to 50 cm in length. The fleshy leaves of this plant are
arranged in a rosette and measure 2-15 cm in length. The leaves are green to
grayish-green and have dense white hairs and parallel veins on their surface. P.
stratiotes flowers in the
late summer, but the flowers plant are small and inconspicuous. Phytoremediation efficacy of P.
stratiotes has been evaluated by Farnese et
al. [34] and Ugya et al. [35].
CONCLUSIONS- Water
pollution is one of the biggest environmental concerns and it is evident that
phytoremediation is a providing better solution to handle this problem. Hence,
the harvesting of aquatic plants from water bodies should be avoided in
order to control pollution in the aquatic environment and reduce the health
risks to humans and animals caused by heavy metal contamination. Meanwhile,
after harvesting plants, accumulated metals could be removed from plant mass
through leaching methods.
REFERENCES
1.
Hong KS, Lee HM, Bae JS, Ha
MG, Jin JS, Hong TE, Kim JP, Jeong ED. Removal of heavy metal ions by using
calcium carbonate extracted from starfish treated by protease and amylase. J.
Anal. Sci. Technol., 2011; 2(2):75–82.
2.
Kushwaha S. Heavy metal
concentrations in feathers of critically endangered long-billed vultures (Gyps Indicus) in Bundelkhand region,
India. Int. J. Life. Sci. Scienti. Res., 2016; 2(4):365-375.
3.
Menon P, Joshi N, Joshi Effect
of heavy A. metals on seed germination of Trigonella
foenum-graceum L. Int. J. Life. Sci. Scienti. Res., 2016: 2(4):488-493.
4.
Njagi JM, Akunga DN, Njagi
MM, Ngugi MP, Njagi EMN. Heavy metal pollution of the environment by dumpsites:
a case of Kadhodeki Dumpsite. Int. J. Life. Sci. Scienti. Res., 2016;
2(2):191-197.
5.
Rao MV, Acharya Y, Bala AS,
Paramben S, Sowmya K, Raj BV: Study of heavy metals in abnormal growth and
development using an alternate animal model: Heterometrus fulvipes. Int. J. Life. Sci. Scienti. Res., 2017;
3(1):800-807.
6.
Singh CB, Ansari BA.
Biochemical markers of oxidative stress in brain of zebra fish Danio rerio exposed to different heavy
metals lead and Cobalt. Int. J. Life. Sci. Scienti. Res., 2017; 3(6):1484-1494.
7.
Akpor OB, Muchie.
Remediation of heavy metals in drinking water and wastewater treatment systems:
Processes and applications. International Journal of the Physical Sciences,
2010; 5(12):1807-1817.
8.
Rakhshaee R, Giahi M,
Pourahmad A. Studying effect of cell wall’s carboxyl-carboxylate ratio change
of Lemna minor to remove heavy metals
from aqueous solution, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009; 163(1):165–173.
9.
Cho-Ruk K, Kurukote J,
Supprung P, Vetayasuporn S. Perennial plants in the phytoremediation of
leadcontaminated soils. Biotechnology, 2006; 5(1):1–4.
10.
Valipour A, Raman VK, Ahn
YH. Effectiveness of domestic waste water treatment using a bio-hedge water
hyacinth wetland system. Water, 2015; 7:329–347.
11.
Lone MI, He Z, Stoffella PJ,
Yang X. Phytoremediation of heavy metals polluted soils and water: progress and
perspectives. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B, 2008; 9(3):210-220.
12. Hua
J, Zhang C, Yin Y, Chen R, Wang X. Phytoremediation potential of three aquatic
macrophytes in manganese-contaminated water. Water Environ. J., 2012; 26:335–342.
13. Singh
D, Tiwari A, Gupta R. Phytoremediation of lead from wastewater using aquatic
plants. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2012; 8:01–11.
14.
Rahman MA, Hasegawa H.
Aquatic arsenic: phytoremediation using floating macrophytes. Chemosphere,
2011; 83:633–646.
15.
Thakur S, Singh L, Wahid ZA,
Siddiqui MF, Atnaw SM, Din MFM. Plant-driven removal of heavy metals from soil:
uptake, translocation, tolerance mechanism, challenges, and future
perspectives. Environ. Monit. Assess., 2016; 188: 1–11.
16.
Kumar JIN, Soni H, Kumar RN,
Bhatt I. Macrophytes in phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated water and
sediments in Pariyej Community Reserve, Gujarat, India. Turk. J. Fish. Aquat.
Sci., 2008; 8: 193-200.
17.
Newete SW, Byrne MJ. The
capacity of aquatic macrophytes for phytoremediation and their disposal with
specific reference to water hyacinth, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2016;
23:10630–10643.
18.
Mohedano RA, Costa RH,
Tavares FA, Belli Filho P. High nutrient removal rate from swine wastes and
protein biomass production by full-scale duckweed ponds. Bioresourc. Technol.,
2012; 112:98–104.
19.
Zhang D, Gersberg RM, Ng WJ,
Tan SK. Removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in aquatic
plant-based systems: A review, Environ. Pollut., 2014; 184: 620–639.
20.
Guimaraes FP, Aguiar R, Oliveira
JA, Silva JAA, Karam D. Potential of macrophyte for removing arsenic from
aqueous solution. Planta Daninha, 2012; 30:683–696.
21. Mkandawire
M, Dudel EG. Accumulation of arsenic in Lemna
gibba L. (duckweed) in tailing waters of two abandoned uranium mining sites
in Saxony, Germany. Sci. Total. Environ., 2005; 336:81–89.
22.
Bocuk H, Yakar A, Türker OC.
Assessment of Lemna gibba L.
(duckweed) as a potential ecological indicator for contaminated aquatic
ecosystem by boron mine effluent. Biol. Indic., 2013; 29:538–548.
24.
Ray S, Islam S, Tumpa DR, Kayum MA, Shuvro SD. A study on arsenic
and copper extraction capacity of Spirodela
polyrhiza from water. Journal of Civil Engineering and Construction
Technology, 2015; 6(1):1-9.
25.
Tang J, Chen C, Chen L, Daroch M, Cui Y. Effects of pH, initial Pb2+
concentration, and polyculture on lead remediation by three duckweed species. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017; 24:23864–23871.
26.
Hegazy AK, Emam MH,
Lovett-Doust L, Azab E, El-Khatib AA. Response of duckweed to lead exposure:
phytomining, bioindicators and bioremediation. Desalination and Water
Treatment, 2017; 70:227–234.
27.
Gao J, Garrison AW, Hoehamer
C, Mazur CS, Wolfe NL. Uptake and phytotransformation of organophosphorus
pesticides by axenically cultivated aquatic plants. Journal of Agricultural and
Food Chemistry, 2000; 48:6114−6120.
28.
Chaudhuri D, Majumder A, Misra AK,
Bandyopadhyay K. Cadmium removal by Lemna
minor and Spirodela polyrhiza.
International Journal of Phytoremediation, 2014; 16(11):1119-1132.
29.
Liao SW. Chang WL. Heavy
metal phytoremediation by water hyacinth at constructed wetlands in Taiwan. J.
Aquat., Plant Manage., 2004; 42:60-68.
30.
Rai PK. Phytoremediation of
Hg and Cd from industrial effluents using an aquatic free floating
macrophyte Azolla pinnata. International Journal of
Phytoremediation, 2008; 10:430-439.
31.
Kooh MRR, Lim LBL, Lim LH,
Bandara JMRS. Batch adsorption studies on the removal of malachite green from
water by chemically modified Azolla pinnata. Desalination and Water
Treatment, 2016; 57:14632-14646.
32.
Mandakini
LLU, Bandara NJGJ, Gunawardana D. A Study on the phytoremediation potential of Azolla pinnata under
laboratory conditions. Journal of Tropical Forestry and Environment, 2016; 6(1):36-49.
35. Ugya AY, Imam TS, Tahir SM. The use of Pistia stratiotes to
remove some heavy metals from Romi stream: A case study of Kaduna Refinery and
Petrochemical company polluted stream. IOSR J. Environ. Sci. Toxicol. Food
Technol., 2015; 9:48-51.