Research Article (Open access) |
---|
Int. J. Life. Sci. Scienti. Res., 3(3):
1031-1038,
May 2017
Clinical Analysis of Long Non-coding RNA (LncRNA): Therapeutic
Targeting of Tumorigenesis and Tumor Disease
Biaoru Li*
Georgia Cancer Center, MCG, Augusta, GA, USA 30912
*Address for
Correspondence: Dr. Biaoru Li, Faculty of Research
Scientist, Clinical Bioinformatics Specialist, and Member of GA Cancer Center,
Augusta University, GA 30912
Abstract- Long non-coding RNAs(lncRNAs) are
a group of longer than 200 nucleotides which are the largest and more diverse
transcripts in the cells. After study from Functional Annotation of Mammalian cDNA, lncRNAs demonstrated some
special characteristics such as lower quantity, higher tissue-specificity,
higher stage specificity and higher cell subtype specificity. The current
evidence from tumor diseases suggests that lncRNAs
are an important regulatory RNA present at tumor cells, and therefore their
alterations are associated with tumorigenesis and
tumor diseases. Here we presented a clinical landscape of lncRNA
including detection of lncRNA and their clinical
application such as diagnosis biomarkers and therapeutic targets. We also
discussed the challenges and resolving strategies for these clinical
applications.
Key words: Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA), Transcripts, sampling,
Tumor and tumorigenesis
INTRODUCTION- Long non-coding RNAs(lncRNAs) are some longer than 200 nucleotides in which most
of them have not any coding protein function[1]. After several years’
study from projects called as Functional Annotation of Mammalian cDNA (FANTOMs), 35,000 non-coding transcripts identified
from their projects demonstrated that lncRNAs are
10-fold lower than mRNAs with a little open reading frame (ORF) but lncRNA structures are similar to mRNAs including 5’
capping, splicing, and polyadenylation[2].
Interestingly, lncRNAshave about 78%
tissue-specificity, higher stage specificity and higher cell subtype
specificity[3] while mRNAs are only about 19% tissue-specificity,
lower stage specificity and lower cell subtype specificity.
LncRNAssequences
are located intergenic genome,and therefore they can be transcribed as complex,
overlapping transcripts from protein-coding genes with sense and antisense
directions. A comprehensive set of human lncRNAs are
analyzed and annotated by their genomic organization, modifications, cellular
locations and tissue expression profiles so that now human lncRNAsare
finally discovered as a bias toward two-exon
transcripts[4]. Because of lack strong conservation, lncRNAmay play an adaptive selection in evolutionary
pressures or environment pressures. Total RNA sequencing from cDNA libraries show that very few numbers of lncRNA have biologically translated proteins. As Fig 1,
during their RNA transcriptions, lncRNAs target
transcriptional activators or repressors utilized complex such as by Evf-2
functions with a co-activator for the homeobox
transcription factor (D1x2), by CREB binding protein, by HDAC system, by Apolipoprotein A1 (APOA1), by Alu
RNA transcripts, functional repeat sequence domains by Kcnq1ot1, by Xlsirt and Xist and heat shock
RNA-1 (HSR-1) in which an RNAP III regulating its RNAP II supports lncRNA functional regulation. After transcriptional
regulation, lncRNA also involve in mRNA splicing,
transport, translation, and degradation. Besides those, lncRNA
also play function in siRNAs, epigenetics,
imprinting, active X-chromosome, telomere function. Some lncRNAs
maybe have their coding proteins but it is still under investigation[5].
In clinical fields,
increasing evidence demonstrated that lncRNA
alterations are associated with tumor diseases. Here I concluded an outline
from clinical sampling, lncRNA detection and clinical
application fromlncRNAs aberrance in tumor diseases
as Fig 2. In the end of manual, I will present some challenges, and therefore I
will suggest some strategies for these future applications.
Clinical
Sample and Detection- Samples are collected for lncRNAdetection and clinical analysis for patients, either
from tumor tissue or from non-tumor tissue such as body fluids. As we mentioned somewhere else, sampling methods
for RNA detection including non-tumor tissue
sampling and tumor tissue sampling[6].
Non-tumor tissue processes for lncRNA analysis
include body liquid specimens, cell free circulating lncRNAs,
circulating tumor cell (CTC) and exosome. Non-tumor
tissue performances are techniques
which are quickly developing in clinical application and biological companies
at present. Tumor tissue
sampling includes clinical sampling in
vitro; clinical sampling ex vivo
and tissue level sampling with down stream analyses in silico for lncRNA analysis concluded at Table 1. After we understand disadvantages and advantagesof RNA sampling as demnonstrated
at Table 1, we need to decide a best way to harvest patient samples. If tumor
samples are available such as surgically removal or biopsy, tumor cells
sampling is first desirable. Because tumors are highly heterogeneous in tumor
tissue, specific lncRNA are very important for
downstream diagnosis and therapeutic targeting. If physician need length ways
study the change or clinicians need screen lncRNA
change for tumor biomarkers and study therapeutic targeting, liquid biopsy is a
valuable choice because it is easily accessible and minimally invasive.
Table 1:
Clinical Sampling for lncRNA Performance
Non-tumor level |
Tumor tissue level |
||||||
Methods |
Body fluid |
cflncRNA |
Exosome |
CTC-lncRNA |
Sampling in vitro |
Sampling ex vivo |
Tumor tissue |
Clinical
application |
1. Monitor lncRNA during treatment 2. prognosis 3. prediction |
Precision medicine for diagnosis and treatment |
|||||
Advantages |
An easily accessible, minimally invasive way |
Higher Specificity and sensitivity |
|||||
There are two ways to detect lncRNA expressions: (a) specific lncRNA detection by either real time PCR orlncRNA FISH and (b) genomic detection by either microarray or next-generation RNA sequencing. Because lncRNA scan be classified into antisense, Intergenic, intronic, overlapping, bidirectional according to the position and direction of transcription in relation to other genes, some companies set up lncRNAdatabase with their primer designs for Q-rtPCR as Fig 3A. For example, QIAGEN set up an in house database based on human Gencode 19 with the confirmed lncRNA databases containing over 28,000 RT of lncRNA qPCR Assays, their RT2 lncRNA assays have increasingly used for experiments in tumor diseases[7]. RNA FISH is a cytogenetic technique that uses fluorescent probe to bind to lncRNA with a high degree of sequence complementarityas Fig 3B. Fluorescence microscope can find out where the fluorescent probe is bound to the lncRNA. Because lncRNA only express in transcriptional levelwithout protein expression, lncRNA FISH will be very important technique to define the lncRNA expression within cells and tissues though RNA FISH can be used to detect all three RNA (mRNA, miRNA and lncRNA)[8]. Some companies have routinely serviced a probe design with their detection system.
In microarray-based approaches as
Fig 4A, two screening methods include traditional microarray and tiling array
to identify lncRNAs. Because traditional microarrays
can only detect the presence or absence of known lncRNAs
in an RNA pool, they cannot detect novel lncRNAs. DNA
tiling arrays contain oligonucleotide probes
encompassing an entire length of a defined DNA regionto
identify novel lncRNAsso that DNA tiling arrays are a
major advantage to discover new lncRNA. Some companies
developed their microarray chips to detect lncRNA
such as Array star and Affymetrix with about 30,000 lncRNAexpression panel assay [9].
RNA-seq is a very powerful technique to detect and quantify lncRNAs as Fig4B. Because disadvantage of
a RNA-seq is the time and cost by the down stream analysis of the data, it is only used to
discover previously unknown lncRNAs.
Technically, after removal of rRNA from total RNA,
which is suggestive, by some commercially available kits, both polyadenylated RNA and non-polyadenylated
RNA can be used for lncRNA-seq. After sequencing, the
generated reads are aligned to human hg19 reference genomes with TopHat software. The reads are
used to assemble a transcriptome and discover
previously unannotated transcripts by Cufflinks.
Novel lncRNAs can be identified by excluding
protein-coding transcripts and annotated lncRNAs
based on the databases of RefSeq, ENCODE, and FANTOM
(Functional Annotation of the Mammalian Genome). Finally lncRNAs
databases are generated by either lncRNAdb or NRED (Noncoding RNA Expression Database)[10].
After we understand
clinical lncRNA detection, clinical scientists
require to choose a detection method for their
application. The selection is relied
on clinical purpose. For example, if lncRNA assayed
as one or two lncRNAs, qPCR
assay and RNA FISH are first option. lncRNA-tiling array and RNA-seq will be
very good candidates for scientists to screen new lncRNA
alteration while traditional microarray can detect known lncRNA.
Finally, lncRNA profiles performance also
should be considered their downstream
analysis such as skilled bioinformatics scientists and available tools.
Clinical application- As
I mentioned before, lncRNAs are RNAs with some
special features, such as higher tissue-specificity, higher stage specificity
and higher cell subtype specificity, and therefore their expression markers
could be used for biomarkers of diagnostics and classification in tumor
diseases and tumorigenesis.
lncRNAs biomarkers for tumor prediction- As Table 2 demonstrated, RNA FISH techniques are increasingly used
in lncRNA aberrant detection. For example, PCA3 and
PCAT1 have been routinely studied in relationship between prostate tumor and
higher expression from lncRNA FISH for pathology
diagnosis; GAS5 have been reported in breast tumor. UCA1 is reported to
down-regulated with bladder cancer[11].
Encouragingly, an exon microarray
results support lncRNAFISHafter study for thirteen
different cancers because some of them have been reported in prostate cancer,
breast cancer andbladder cancer as lncRNA FISH results [12].
Tumor Types |
IncRNA |
Ensembl ID |
LncRNA Expression |
Prostate Cancer |
PCA3 |
ENSG00000225937 |
Up-regulation |
PCAT1 |
ENSG00000253438 |
Up-regulation |
|
PCGEM1 |
ENSG00000227418 |
Up-regulation |
|
Breast Cancer |
GAS5 |
ENSG00000234741 |
Up-regulation |
Colon Cancer |
KCNQ1OT1 |
ENSG00000258492 |
Up-regulation |
Bladder Cancer |
UCA1 |
ENSG00000214049 |
Down-regulation |
Multiple Cancer |
PVT1 |
ENSG00000249859 |
Up-regulation |
HULC |
ENSG00000251164 |
Up-regulation |
|
MEG3 |
ENSG00000214548 |
Down-regulation |
Table 3: Potential prognostic lncRNA markers
Diseases |
Basic Function |
LncRNA Names |
Genomic location |
Gene size (kb) or Probe-ID |
Locus |
Colon cancer |
Oncogenic lncRNA |
91H |
Chr11p15 |
119.32 |
H19/IGF2 |
CCAT1 |
Chr8q24.21 |
11.88 |
c-MYC |
||
CLMAT3 |
Chr14q32.31 |
1.55 |
SPARC |
||
DANCR |
Chr4q12 |
7.94 |
– |
||
FEZF1-AS1 |
Chr7q31.32 |
6.42 |
FEZF1 |
||
FTX |
ChrXq13.2 |
329.62 |
XIC |
||
HOTAIR |
Chr12q13.13 |
12.64 |
HOXC |
||
HOTTIP |
Chr7p15.2 |
8.68 |
HoxA |
||
lncRNA-ATB |
Chr14q11.2 |
2.73 |
– |
||
MALAT1 |
Chr11q13.1 |
8.75 |
NEAT-2 |
||
PCAT1 |
Chr8q24.21 |
173.96 |
– |
||
PVT1 |
Chr8q24.21 |
306.72 |
PVT1 |
||
TUG1 |
Chr22q12.2 |
9.7 |
TUG1 |
||
UCA1 |
Chr19p13.12 |
7.37 |
UCA1 |
||
Tumor suppressive lncRNA |
GAS5 |
Chr1q25.1 |
4.98 |
GAS5 |
|
LINC01296 |
Chr22q11.1 |
20.55 |
– |
||
MEG3 |
Chr14q32.2 |
81.62 |
DLK1-MEG3 |
||
NcRAN |
Chr17q25.1 |
7.58 |
SNHG16 |
||
ncRuPAR |
Chr5q13.3 |
0.48 |
ncRuPAR |
||
RP11-462C24.1 |
Chr4q25 |
82.27 |
RPL34 |
||
TUSC7 |
Chr3q13.31 |
14.34 |
LSAMP |
||
Breast cancer |
lncRNA |
RP1-34M23.5 |
Chr 1:
34,761,426–34,788,097 (−) |
216579_at, 243747_at |
ENSG00000255811.1 |
RP11-202K23.1 |
Chr 1:
102,199,739–102,389,630 (−) |
1566142_at, 216858_x_at, 201439_at, 224894_at, 202076_at, 1561543_at,
241072_s_at, 219086_at, 1554549_a_at, 239225_at, 227541_at.227693_at,
230223_at |
ENSG00000233359.1 |
||
RP11-560G2.1 |
Chr 12:
75,234,740–75,298,508 (+) |
224370_s_at |
ENSG00000254451.2 |
||
RP4-591L5.2 |
Chr 1:
30,415,825–30,421,108 (+) |
219781_s_at, 221968_s_at |
ENSG00000231949.1 |
||
RP13-104F24.2 |
Chr 17:
64,749,663–64,781,707 (−) |
229747_x_at |
ENSG00000215769.8 |
||
RP11-506D12.5 |
Chr 17:
50,840,057–50,841,626 (−) |
1554773_at |
ENSG00000261976.2 |
||
ERVH48-1 |
Chr 21: 42,916,803–42,925,646
(−) |
232191_at |
ENSG00000233056.2 |
||
RP4-613B23.1 |
Chr 3:
42,601,963–42,654,388 (−) |
231235_at, 202380_s_at, 1557736_at |
ENSG00000230084.5 |
||
RP11-360F5.1 |
Chr 4:
39,112,677–39,126,818 (−) |
226001_at, 232297_at, 233866_at |
ENSG00000249207.1 |
||
CTD-2031P19.5 |
Chr 5:
55,936,143–55,941,727 (+) |
204864_s_at, 212195_at |
ENSG00000262211.1 |
||
RP11-247A12.8 |
Chr 9:
129,175,807–129,177,575 (+) |
226559_at |
ENSG00000268050.2 |
||
SNHG7 |
Chr 9:
136,721,366–136,728,184 (−) |
229002_at, 1552729_at |
ENSG00000233016.6 |
lncRNAs biomarkers
in circulating lncRNA and body liquid- As discussed above, non-tumor tissue
processes are very “popular”
techniques for downstream genomic analysis including lncRNA
performance because of their non-invasive process. Non-tumor
tissue processes for lncRNA analysis include body
liquid specimens, cell free circulating lncRNAs,
circulating tumor cell (CTC) and exosome. Clinically, at present, lncRNAbegin to be used to study special lncRNA
expression in some special tumors and global profiling of the lncRNA aberrance.
As shown at Table 4, MALAT-1 was discovered down-regulated in lung cancer from
peripheral blood cells while HOTAIR was discovered up-regulated in colon cancer
from peripheral blood cells. PCA3 is uncovered in urine of prostate cancer
patients while UCA1 is found in urine of bladder cancer. Interestingly,
AA174084, an lncRNA, can be discovered down-level at
gastric juice in stomach cancer patients[16].
Table 4: Circulating lncRNA
prognostic lncRNA markers for tumor diseases
Cancer Type |
lncRNA |
Samples |
Change |
Lung cancer |
MALAT1 |
Peripheral blood cells |
Down-regulation |
Colon cancer |
HOTAIR |
Peripheral blood cells |
Up-regulation |
Prostate cancer |
PCA3 |
Urine |
up-regulation |
Liver cancer |
PRP11-160H22.5, LOC149086, XLOC014172 |
plasma |
up-regulation |
Bladder cancer |
UCA1 |
Urine |
up-regulation |
Stomach cancer |
AA174084 |
Gastric juice |
down-regulation |
lncRNAspredicting tumorigenesis-
According to a genome-wide
survey on somatic copy-number alterations (SCNAs) of long noncoding
RNA (lncRNA), about 21.8% of lncRNA
genes were located in regions with focal SCNAs[17]. For example, by
integrating bioinformatics analyses of lncRNA SCNAs
and LncRNAexpression, focally amplified lncRNA on chromosome 1(FAL1) partially repress p21 which is
tumor suppressive mechanism[18].
The important somatic genetic alteration in SCNAs is
either amplified or deleted, and thus some of the genes show increased or
decreased expression levels finally leading to aberrance from normal cell into
cancer cells. The data have suggested that the lncRNAslocated
in the SCNAs arerelated with tumorigenesis
so that they called a relationship as driver of tumorigenesis,
or lncRNAs with SCNAs should result in corresponding
gene expression changes[19].
These lncRNA between SCAN and expression profiles are
very suggestive although these profiles should be further confirmed for cancer
driver.
Clinical Challenge for
Application- When the aberrant lncRNAsare
discovered in tumor diseases, the aberrant detection will unfold a great chance
for tumor diagnosis and therapeutic targets. LncRNAs
can be readily detected in biological fluids and their highly specific
expression pattern can be assayed, and therefore lncRNAs
could successfully be used for accurate diagnostics and classification.
Although this application are going to apply for circulating blood from
clinical patients, the emerging techniques of circulating lncRNAs
is restrained by the known information for tumor diagnosis, for example, it is
cause of tumor diseases of lncRNA or an lncRNAconsequence of the disease itself.
In
the therapeutic purpose, although some companies and organizations such as the
Allen Institution for Brain Science, CuRNA, Regulus Therapeutics, Miragen
Therapeutics, and Santaris Pharmaare
developing lncRNA-based strategies against cancer[20], there are several challenges for lncRNAs treatment. For example, (A) LncRNAS
can be blocked by functional molecules such as small molecule inhibitors,
however, our current limited knowledge influences using small molecular
inhibitors in the complicated complexes [21]; (B) Silencing of lncRNAs through RNAi technology
for LncRNA expression levels may be uncertain because
of their secondary structure or intracellular localization. its
potential application on patients is more limited as it involves targeted
genetic manipulation[22]; (C) Structure disruption could be designed
to bind to lncRNAs and change or mimic their
secondary structure. The targeting of harmful lncRNAs
can be applied for gene therapy to specific cellsbut
some lncRNA has toxicity for normal cells[23].Although the potential
application of lncRNAs is huge for therapeutic
purpose, their complicated structuresand functions should be further studied.
It is indisputable that
the clearer after we study lncRNA function and
structure, the more chances for clinical scientists to apply for lncRNA into clinical diagnosis and treatment. Expectantly, lncRNA can approach our desire which will fit an lncRNAdetection from laboratories into bedside patients for
treatment of tumor disease.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS-
Under the support of Dr. H. D. Preisler, we had set
up the method to analyze clinical genomic analysis including single-cell
genomic profiles of tumor cell from solid tumors and leukemia. Now we are going
to use new genomic platform to continue working in lncRNA
aberrance. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is
solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply
recommendation.
REFERENCES
1.
Amaral
PP, Clark MB, Gascoigne DK, Dinger ME, Mattick JS.LncRNAdb: A reference database for long noncoding RNAs.Nucleic Acids Research.
2010; 39: D146–D151.
2.
Carninci
P, Kasukawa T, Katayama S. The transcriptional
landscape of the mammalian genome. Science. 2005; 309 (5740): 1559–63.
3.
Yan Liying,
Yang Mingyu, GuoHongshan,
Yang Lu, Wu Jun Li Rong, Liu Ping, Lian Ying, Zheng Xiaoying.
Single-cell RNA-Seq profiling of human preimplantation embryos and embryonic stem cells. Nature.
Structural & Molecular Biology. 2015; 20 (9): 1131–1139.
4.
Derrien
T, Johnson R, Bussotti G. et al. The GENCODE v7
catalog of human long noncoding RNAs: Analysis of
their gene structure, evolution, and expression. Genome Research. 2012; 22 (9):
1775–1789.
5.
Goodrich JA, Kugel
JF. Non-coding-RNA regulators of RNA polymerase II transcription. Nature
Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2006; 7(8): 612–6.
6.
Li Biaoru. Clinical Analysis of OncomiR
-Therapeutic Targeting of Tumorigenesis and Tumor
Disease. Int J Genomics Proteomics Metabolomics Bioinformatics. International Journal of
Genomics, Proteomics, Metabolomics &
Bioinformatics. 2017; 2(2), 28-35.
7.
Kohls
K, Schmidt D, Holdenrieder S, Müller
SC, Ellinger J. Detection of cell-free lncRNA in serum of cancer patients. 2015; 54(6):819-25.
8.
Chen L, Yang H, Xiao Y, Tang X, Li Y,
Han Q, Fu J, Yang Y, Zhu Y. Lentiviral-mediated overexpression of long non-coding RNA GAS5 reduces invasion
by mediating MMP2 expression and activity in human melanoma cells. Int J Oncol. 2016; 48(4):1509-18.
9.
Yu X, Lin Y, Sui W, Zou
Y, Lv Z. Analysis of distinct long noncoding RNA transcriptional fingerprints in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer
Med. 2017; 10.1002
10. Yang
Y, Chen L, Gu J, et al.
Recurrently deregulated lncRNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Commun.
2017; 13(8):14421.
11. Eissa
S, Matboli M, Essawy NO, Shehta M, Kotb YM. Rapid
detection of urinary long non-coding RNA urothelial
carcinoma associated one using a PCR-free nanoparticle-based assay. Biomarkers.
2015; 20(3):212-7.
12. Chandra
Gupta S, NandanTripathi Y. Potential of long
non-coding RNAs in cancer patients: From biomarkers to therapeutic targets. Int J Cancer. 2016; 10.1002.
13. Luo
ZF, Zhao D, Li XQ, et al. Clinical significance of HOTAIR expression in colon
cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2016; 22(22):5254-9.
14. Seth
A, Kitching R, Landberg G, Xu J, Zubovits J, Burger AM. Gene
expression profiling of ductal carcinomas in situ and
invasive breast tumors. Anticancer Res. 2003; 23(3A):2043-51.
15. Zhang
TH, Liang LZ, Liu XL, et al. Long non-coding RNA MALAT1 interacts with miR-124
and modulates tongue cancer growth by targeting JAG1. Oncol
Rep. 2017; 10.3892.
16. Shao
Y, Ye M, Jiang X, et al. Gastric juice long noncoding
RNA used as a tumor marker for screening gastric cancer. Cancer. 2014;
120(21):3320-8.
17. Wang
ZL, Li B, Piccolo SR, et al. Integrative analysis reveals clinical phenotypes
and oncogenic potentials of long non-coding RNAs
across 15 cancer types. Oncotarget. 2016;
7(23):35044-55.
18. Hu
X, Feng Y, Zhang D, et al. A functional genomic approach identifies FAL1 as an oncogenic
long noncoding RNA that associates with BMI1 and
represses p21 expression in cancer. Cancer Cell. 2014; 26(3):344-57.
19. Jeong
S, Lee J, Kim D, Seol MY, Lee WK, Jeong
JJ, Nam KH, Jung SG, Shin DY, Lee EJ, Chung WY, Jo YS. Relationship of Focally Amplified Long Noncoding on Chromosome 1 (FAL1) lncRNA
with E2F Transcription Factors in Thyroid Cancer. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;
95(4):e2592.
20. Yolanda
Sa´nchez and MaiteHuarte.
Long Non-Coding RNAs: Challenges for Diagnosis and Therapies. NUCLEIC ACID
THERAPEUTICS. 2013; 23(1):10.1089.
21. Tsaimc
MC, Spitale RC, and Chang HY. Long intergenic noncoding RNAs: new
links in cancer progression. Cancer Res. 2011; 71:3–7.
22. Gutschner
T, Baas M and Diederichs S. Noncoding
RNA gene silencing through genomic integration of RNA destabilizing elements
using zinc finger nucleases. Genome Res. 2011; 21, 1944–1954.
23. Colley,
SM, Leedman PJ. SRA and its binding partners: an
expanding role for RNA-binding coregulators in
nuclear receptor-mediated gene regulation. Crit. Rev. Biochem.
Mol. Biol. 2009; 44, 25–33.