Research Article (Open access) |
---|
ABSTRACT- The present investigation on the impact of fungicides on the growth and development of Spodoptera litura
was carried out in the laboratory of the Department of Entomology, SKUAST- Jammu, during the year 2012-13. Base-line
toxicity of two fungicides viz., mancozeb and ridomil MZ were evaluated against S. litura in the laboratory. The results
showed that fungicides significantly influenced the growth and development of S. litura. The larval development duration
was significantly short, and it was an average (14.61± 0.30), (16.28±0.66) days, when treated with ridomil, and mancozeb
respectively. The results show that fungicides can serve a practical tool to reduce the S.litura and may assume a greater
role in integrated programs showed to manage insect pests and pathogens.
Key-words- Spodoptera litura, Fungicides, Bioassay, Growth and development
INTRODUCTION-
Spodoptera litura Fabricius commonly known as tobacco
caterpillar is a polyphagous pest and cause considerable
damage to soybean, cotton and vegetables [1-3]. Use of
insecticides for controlling this pest is on the rise and it has
the ability to develop resistance to many insecticides [4-5].
Further, various pesticides viz., herbicides, fungicides have
been reported to have detrimental effects on different
aspects of a life cycle of the S. litura [6-7].
In addition, to understand the influence of fungicides on
expression of resistance in plants against insects, it is also
essential to complete a database on the direct and indirect
effect of fungicides on insect pests [6]. Therefore, it is
essential to know the role of fungicides on the
developmental profile of Spodoptera litura. Such
observations will help to understand the shifts in insect pest
population on a crop influenced by these fungicides.
Information on this interesting area of pest management is
scanty.
Therefore, keeping the things in view, the present studies
were contemplated to explore the possibilities of fungicides
against tobacco caterpillar, S. litura to reduce pesticide
load.
MATERIALS AND METHODS-
The larvae and egg patches of S. litura were collected from
castor plant and reared in laboratory at the Department of
Entomology, SKUAST- Jammu, J&K, India. The bioassays
were kept at a temperature of 26±2oC, 60-70±5% relative
humidity and 16:8 (Light: Dark) photoperiod. These
laboratory-reared larvae were used for bioassays and the
cultures were maintained throughout the study period.
Castor leaves were collected from unsprayed plants,
washed and air-dried and made 5 cm diameter leaf discs
with the help of a leaf cutter. A stock solution of each
tested fungicide was made from the available formulation
and different concentrations were prepared. The leaf disc
was dipped in each concentration for 20 seconds [7-8] and
allowed to dry at ambient temperature for about 15-20 min
in a fume hood. Air- dried leaf discs were then placed in
individual plastic petri dishes (5 cm diameter) containing
moistened filter paper. Each treatment (concentration)
including controls was replicated three times. Ten larvae of
S. litura (2nd instar), of uniform age, were exposed to
different concentrations. The larvae were fed on treated
leaves for 48 hrs, thereafter fresh leaves were provided ad
libitum. Observations were recorded on larval period, pupal
period, adult emergence, for all test chemicals. From these
observations, growth index and success index were also calculated [9].
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Mancozeb-
Data presented in Table 1 revealed that the fungicide has a
significant effect on the growth and development
parameters of S. litura. Overall development of larva
significantly prolonged when treated with higher
concentrations. Data obtained in Table (1) illustrate that
there was a significant prolongation (p<0.001) for all larval
stages, the maximum prolongation (20.33+ 0.0.33 days)
being recorded at 2000ppm till pupation comparing with
12.33+ 0.33 days for control larvae. The pupation duration
and pupation percentage ranged from 8.36+ 0.27 (62.5ppm)
to 12.76+ 0.12 (2000ppm) days and 30.00+ 11.54 to
66.66+ 3.33 percent, respectively. Growth and success
indices also revealed the toxic effect of this compound on
an insect with the increase in concentration. The growth
and success indices ranged from 3.05+ 0.15 (62.5ppm) to
0.91+ 0.35 (2000ppm) days and 0.62+ 0.09 to 0.47+ 0.08
per cent, respectively. Singh and Bhattacharya [6] also
observed that mancozeb at concentration of 0.125% to
0.132% resulted in 62.50 to 92.50% survival of S. litura
larvae. The larval periods, as well as its mortality increased
with increase in the level of mancozeb in the diet. A
significant reduction in pupation percentage and adult
emergence was recorded when larvae were reared on diets
fortified with 0.0625% of manoczeb. A field dose of 0.25%
resulted in 5.00% pupation and adult emergence.
Adamski and Ziemnicki [10] tested ethylene
bis-dithiocarbamate fungicide mancozeb on larvae and
imago of Spodoptera exigua and observed decreased
survival, disturbances, and malformations in development,
changes in the activity of tested enzymes.
Guven and Goven [11] tested different pesticides on C.
carnea in the laboratory including three fungicides and
found that fenarimol, mancozeb+metalaxyl, and micronized
sulphur showed 45 %, 28 % and 16 % death rate,
respectively. Adamski et al. [12] observed that mancozeb
causes multilevel alterations, within various tissues and
systems. The observed malformations are similar to those
caused by fenitrothion and carbaryl (carbamate insecticide)
in Spodoptera exigua and Tenebrio molitor fat body [13].
Therefore, they seem to be rather universal, caused by a
chemical imbalance within cells, not the direct action of
pesticides on target tissues and cells. The above mentioned
changes are similar to those reported by Sakr et al. [14] for
mice exposed to mancozeb. These authors reported
irregularities of nuclear structure, that led to apoptosis, loss
of glycogen, dilated ER. Such changes obviously slow
down the activity of cells. Therefore, the activity of a fat
body may be decreased. If decreased weight of fat body,
reported for S. exigua [10], is a universal phenomenon, the
activity of fat body and its effect on insect’s development
would be drastically decreased.
Table 1: Effect of mancozeb on the developmental behavior of larvae of Spodoptera litura
Conc. (ppm) |
2nd instar | 3rdinstar | 4th instar | 5th instar | 6th instar | Total larval period (days) |
Pupal period |
Pupation (%) | Adult emergence (%) |
Growth index (G.I.) |
Success index (S.I.) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | 3.00± 3.00a | 2.00±0.0 0a | 2.67± 0.33a | 2.00±0 .00a | 2.66±0 .33a | 12.33± 0.33a | 7.33±0.3 3a | 90.00±5.7 7c | 90.00±5.77 c | 4.56±0. 23d | 1.00±0.00c |
62.5 | 3.00±. 00ab | 2.00±0.0 0a | 2.66± 0.33a | 2.66±0 .33a | 3.00±0 .00a | 13.33± 0.33ab | 8.36±0.2 7b | 66.66±3.3 3b | 66.66±3.33 b | 3.05±0. 15c | 0.62±0.09a b |
125 | 2.66±0 .33a | 2.66±0.3 3ab | 3.00± 0.00a | 2.33±0 .33ab | 3.66±0 .33b | 14.33± 0.33b | 8.66±0.2 8b | 60.00±5.7 7b | 60.00±5.77 b | 2.72±0. 27c | 0.55±0.04a |
250 | 4.00±0 .00bc | 3.00±0.0 0b | 3.00± 0.33a | 2.66±0 .33ab | 3.66±0 .33b | 16.33± 0.33c | 9.26±0.6 3b | 46.66±6.6 6ab | 46.66±6.66 ab | 1.85±0. 26b | 0.80±0.04b |
500 | 5.00±0 .57c | 3.00±0.0 0b | 3.66± 0.33a | 2.66±0 .33ab | 3.66±0 .33ab | 18.00± 1.15cd | 10.70±0. 20c | 46.66±3.3 3ab | 46.66±3.33 ab | 1.63±0. 16ab | 0.62±0.04a b |
1000 | 4.66±0 .66c | 4.00±0.5 7bc | 3.00± 0.00a | 3.66±0 .33bc | 4.33±0 .33bc | 19.33± 0.88de | 11.13±0. 18c | 33.33±3.3 3a | 33.33±3.33 a | 1.09±0. 14a | 0.54±0.04a |
2000 | 4.33±0 .33 | 3.33±0.3 3c | 3.66± 0.33a | 4.00±0 .33c | 5.00±0 .57c | 20.33± 0.33e | 12.76±0. 12d | 30.00±11. 54a | 30.00±11.5 4a | 0.91±0. 35a | 0.47±0.08a |
Conc. (ppm) |
2nd instar | 3rd instar | 4th instar | 5th instar | 6th instar | Larval period (days) |
Pupal period (days) |
Pupation (%) | Adult emergence (%) |
Growth index (G.I) |
Success index (S.I.) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | 3.00± 0.00a | 2.33±0 .33ab | 2.33±0 .33 | 2.67±0 .33ab | 3.00±0 .00b | 13.33±0 .33a | 9.66±0. 33a | 86.66±3.3 3c | 86.66±3.33d | 3.76±0. 14d | 1.00±0. 00c |
31.25 | 2.67± 0.33a | 2.67±0 .33ab | 2.67±0 .33a | 2.67±0 .33ab | 3.00±0 .00b | 14.33±0 .33ab | 10.00±0 .57ab | 53.33±3.3 3b | 53.33±3.33c | 2.18±0. 10c | 0.63±0. 09ab |
62.5 | 3.33± 0.33a | 2.33±0 .33ab | 2.33±2 .67a | 3.00±0 .00b | 2.33±0 .33a | 13.67±0 .67a | 10.33±0 .33ab | 33.33±6.6 6ab | 30.00±5.77b | 1.25±0. 25b | 0.49±0. 04a |
125 | 3.67± 0.33a | 2.00±0 .00a | 2.67±0 .33a | 3.33±0 .33b | 2.67±0 .33b | 14.00±0 .57a | 10.66±0 .66ab | 26.66±8.8 1ab | 23.33±3.33b | 1.02±0. 23b | 0.70±0. 03b |
250 | 3.33± 0.33a | 3.00±0 .57ab | 3.33±0 .67a | 2.00±0 .00a | 2.67±0 .33b | 14.33±0 .33ab | 11.33±0 .33b | 23.33±3.3 3ab | 23.33±3.33 | 0.73±0. 39ab | 0.57±0. 01ab |
500 | 3.33± 0.33a | 3.33±0 .33b | 3.67±0 .33a | 3.00±0 .00b | 2.33±0 .33a | 15.67±0 .33bc | 13.00±0 .57c | 23.33±3.3 3ab | 16.66±8.81a | 0.67±0. 21ab | 0.67±0. 05b |
1000 | 5.00± 0.57b | 2.67±0 .33ab | 3.67±0 .33a | 2.67±0 .33ab | 3.33±0 .33b | 17.00±0 .57c | 15.33±0 .33d | 10.00±5.7 7a | 6.66±3.33 | 0.20±0. 10a | 0.49±0. 04a |
International Journal of Life-Sciences Scientific Research (IJLSSR)
Open Access Policy Authors/Contributors are responsible for originality, contents, correct references, and ethical issues. IJLSSR publishes all articles under Creative Commons Attribution- Non-Commercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode |
How to cite this article: Srivastava K, Sharma S, Sharma D, Kumar R: Effect of Fungicides on Growth and Development of Spodoptera litura. Int. J. Life. Sci. Scienti. Res., 2017; 3(2): 905-908. DOI:10.21276/ijlssr.2017.3.2.5 Source of Financial Support: Nil, Conflict of interest: Nil |