Research Article (Open access)

Int. J. Life. Sci. Scienti. Res., 1(1): 1-4, September 2015


Seroprevalence of Hepatitis C Virus Among Indoor and Outdoor Patients of A Tertiary Care Hospital: One Year Study


Tanuj Gupta1*, P.S.Gill2, Uma Chaudhary3

1Demonstrator, Department of Microbiology, PT. B. D. Sharma PGIMS Rohtak, Haryana, India

2Professor, Department of Microbiology, PT. B. D. Sharma PGIMS Rohtak, Haryana, India

3Senior Pofessor and Head of Department, Department of Microbiology, PT. B. D. Sharma PGIMS Rohtak, Haryana, India


Address for Correspondence:
Mr. Tanuj Gupta, Demonstrator, Department of Microbiology,

PT. B. D. Sharma PGIMS Rohtak-124001, Haryana, India

 

ABSTRACT- Aim: The present study was to know the seroprevalence of Hepatitis C virus among indoor and outdoor patients of a teaching tertiary care hospital in North India.

Study design: Place and duration of study: Department of Microbiology, Pt. B. D. Sharma PGIMS Rohtak, Haryana, India, between August 2013 to July 2014. 

Methodology: This is a retrospective study performed on blood samples collected from patients of all ages and both sexes. Commercially available Erba Lisa Hepatitis C ELISA kits were used which detects anti-HCV IgG antibodies. Statistical analysis was performed when two or more variables were needed to compare. SPSS version 17 was used to calculate P value.

Results: The prevalence of HCV was 3.74% in our study. 72.7% were from males and 27.3% were from females. Highest number of positive samples was from 11-20 years age group (5.6%). The positivity for anti-HCV antibodies was higher in indoor samples (7.8%) as compared to outdoor samples (2.3%).

Conclusion: Strict need to follow universal precautions for HCV control and education of public so that high risk activities should be controlled.

Key Words: Hepatitis C virus, Seroprevalence, anti-HCV antibodies, Indoor, HCV control


INTRODUCTION- Hepatitis C is an infectious disease affecting the liver caused by Hepatitis C virus (HCV). HCV is a RNA virus, heterogenous in nature showing multiple genotypes and subtypes. HCV infection is a global health problem with approximately 170 million persons are chronically infected worldwide, an estimated prevalence of approximately 2% and 3 to 4 million persons newly infected each year.1 Hepatitis C can present as acute or chronic hepatitis. Most of the cases of acute hepatitis C are asymptomatic with patients unaware of the underlying infection. Symptomatic acute hepatitis with jaundice is seen in only 25% of the infected patients.

Nearly 54-86% of the infected personprogresses to chronic hepatitis and about one fifth of the patients develop cirrhosis. The patients with cirrhosis are at a higher risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma and about 1-4% of patients are developing this complication every year.2 HCV antibody prevalence varies from 0.4-2% in different parts of the world. In India, prevalence rate is between 1.5-2% in generalpopulation.3

 

Transmission of HCV is primarily by parenteral route which occur byneedlestick injuries, sharing of contaminated needles in intravenous drug addicts, ear and nose piercing, tattooing, sharing of shaving razor, dental procedures and use of contaminated blood inblood transfusion. Recipients of multiple blood transfusions such as patients of thalassemia, haemoglobinopathies, clotting disorders, patient on haemodialysis are particularly at higher risk for acquiring HCV infection.4Other mode of transmission is vertical transmission from infected mother to children. Approximately 7-8 percent of HCV positive women transmit HCV to their offsprings with a higher rate of transmission seen in women co-infected with HIV.5

Detection of Anti-HCV IgG by serological tests is the most common laboratory procedures used for diagnosing hepatitis C. Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), immunoblot assays and more recently immunechromatography based rapid tests are used for serological testing. The most commonly used initial blood test for Hepatitis C is ELISA. However, none of these tests have potential to discriminate between active and resolved HCV infection.6This study was undertaken on serum samples sent from patients admitted in different wards of our tertiary care teaching hospital and also on patients attending outpatient departments to know the seroprevalence of HCV.



MATERIALS AND METHODS- Hepatitis C testing was carried out in our clinical Microbiology laboratory on those blood samples which were collected by clinicians and received in vacutainers with no anticoagulant from the patientsadmitted in different wards and intensive care units (ICUs) as well as patients attending the outpatient departments. This is a retrospective study conducted during time interval of one year from August 2013 to July 2014.  Commercially available Erba Lisa Hepatitis C ELISA kits were used which detects anti-HCV IgG antibodies. These kits are procured from Transasia Bio-Medicals Ltd, Daman. In the laboratory, serum was extractedby centrifugation as soon as possible to avoid haemolysis. These serum samples were numbered and stored in refrigerator at 2-80C. When ELISA was put, these frozen serum specimens were brought to roomtemperature and were thawed properly. All the reagents were also brought to room-temperature and shaken well before use. Erba Lisa Hepatitis C is based on indirect ELISA using a solid phase prepared with the mixture of synthetic peptides and recombinant proteins of HCV i.e. CORE, NS3, NS4 and NS5. This kit detects only IgG type of anti-HCV. The whole test was performed as per manufacturer’s instructions. Optical density was read at 450nm by ELISA reader and cut off value was calculated. Samples with an Optical density less than the cut off value were considered non-reactive. Samples with an Optical density equal to or greater than the cut off value were considered initial reactive. These samples were retested and on retesting if the optical density was less than the cut off value it was considered as non-reactive and if the retest cut off value of the sample is found more then it was considered reactive. Statistical analysis was performed when two or more variables were needed to compare. SPSS version 17 was used to calculate P value.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION- A total of 10750 blood samples were received during study period for Hepatitis C testing. Out of 10750, 403 (3.74%) samples were reactive for anti-HCV antibodies. Among 403 reactive samples, 293 (72.7%) were from males and 110 (27.3%) were from females (table 1). In terms of P value it was extremely significant (<0.0001). Maximum number of samples was received from age group 21-30 years (23.5%), while highest number of positive samples was from 11-20 years age group (5.6%) (Table 2). Studies from different regions of the world show wide variation in prevalence of HCV. Study from south India reported 4.8% seroprevalence of HCV among hospital based general population. In the same study, seroprevalence in males and females was 5.9% and 3.3% respectively.7 However, low rate of anti-HCV antibody positivity among blood donors has also been reported such as 0.34%, 0.4% and 0.5% rate from Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan respectively.8-10 Monthwise distribution of samples are shown in Table 3.

 

Table 1: Sex wise distribution of reactive samples

 

Total no. of samples received

Number and percentage of Reactivesamples

 

10750

Male=7031

 

403(3.74%)

Male=293(4.16%)

P value

<0.0001

Female=3719

Female=110(2.95%)

 

Table 2: Age wise distribution of reactive samples

Age in years

Total no. of samples

Positive samples

0-10

661

29 (4.4%)

11-20

1549

87(5.6%)

21-30

2526

60(2.4%)

31-40

1869

71(3.8%)

41-50

1448

56(3.8%)

51-60

1265

59(4.6%)

61-70

903

31(3.4%)

71-80

358

07(1.9%)

81-90

171

03(1.8%)

Total

10750

403(3.7%)

 

Table 3: Monthwise distribution of total and positive samples

 

Month

Total no. of samples

No. and percentage of Positive samples

Aug 2013

55

0(0)

Sep 2013

275

09(3.3%)

Oct 2013

354

10(2.8%)

Nov 2013

649

18(2.7%)

Dec 2013

761

14(1.8%)

Jan 2014

865

39(4.5%)

Feb 2014

818

20(2.4%)

March 2014

1201

29(2.4%)

April 2014

1282

93(7.2%)

May 2014

1379

64(4.6%)

June 2014

1607

60(3.7%)

July 2014

1504

47(3.1%)

Total

 

10750

403(3.74%)

 

The positivity for anti-HCV antibodies was higher in indoor samples (7.8%) as compared to outdoor samples (2.3%) (Table 4 and 5). Statistically this difference was also very significant (P value 0.0031).

Table 4: Outdoor and indoor distribution of total and positive samples

 

Total outdoor

Total no. of  samples 

No. and  percentage ofPositive samples

Surgery OPD

3320

47(1.4%)

Medicine OPD

1233

68(5.5%)

Gynaecology OPD

172

09(5.2%)

Paediatrics OPD

70

04(5.7%)

Skin OPD

33

01(3%)

ENT OPD

3088

51(1.6%)

Burn plastic surgery ward

37

03(8.1%)

GIC

146

13(8.9%)

Respiratory intensive care unit

23

01(4.3%)

Cardiovascular surgery ward

70

04(5.7%)

Orthopaedics ward

143

07(4.9%)

Gastro surgery ward

343

45(13.1%)

Nephrology ward

104

06(5.7%)

Thalassemia unit

750

96(12.8%)

Urology ward

867

29(3.3%)

Other wards

351

19(5.4%)

 

Table 5: Total number and percentage of positive outdoor and indoor samples

Total outdoor samples

Number of positive outdoor samples

Total         indoor samples

Number of positive indoor samples

P value

7916

180(2.3%)

2834

223(7.8%)

0.0031

 

In our study, anti-HCV antibodies were detected in 13.1% of patients undergoing routine dialysis in nephrology ward. Similar results has also been reported in a study from Coimbatore in which 12.4% of patients on haemodialysiswere found to be anti-HCV positive.11 A number of risk factors have been identified for HCV infection among the dialysis patients, which include cross infections from the sharing of dialysismachines and the dialysis equipment, the reprocessing of dialyzers and blood lines and the increased requirement of blood transfusions.12, 13

Thalassemia patients are more prone to develop HCV and other transfusion transmitted infections. In our study, 12.8% of the thalassemia patients were found to be positive for anti-HCV antibodies. Unsafetherapeutic injections and not properly screened blood used for transfusion are the predominant modalities of transmission of Hepatitis C in India. In India, mandatoryscreening for HCV was introduced as late as in 2002.However, now a day serological markers for HBV, HCV and HIV are screened in blood banks routinely. The interval from the onset of hepatitis to seroconversion to anti-HCV antibody is 4-32 weeks. As ELISA test detects only anti-HCV antibodies so, if the donors who are infected with Hepatitis C virus but have not develop seroconversion they are missed by ELISA. So, it is essential to adopt strict criteria in the selection of donors and to avoid unnecessary transfusion.This should also be supplemented with health education of general population to increase awareness about this virus and its modes of transmission.


CONCLUSIONS-
Although prevalence of HCV in our study is comparable with other studies from different parts of world, even then there is need to follow the universal precautions for HCV control strictly.


AUTHOR’S CONTRIBUTIONS-
Author 1 performed data collection, organise the data and managed the literature searches. Author 2 designed the study, performed the statistical analysis, and wrote the manuscript. Author 3 and Author 4 managed the analysis of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


CONSENT-
This study doesn’t involve human subjects directly. Blood samples were taken by clinicians from patients. We performed testing on those samples which were received in our department. So, we didn’t get consent form from patients.


ETHICAL APPROVAL-
All the procedures and investigations conducted in this study are standard and do not carry any harmful effects on the patients. Thus the present study is well within the ethical norms and is ethically justified. All the biomedical waste generated in the laboratory is discarded as per the recommended guidelines. So, this study is not against the public interest.


REFERENCES

1.      Shepard CW, Finelli L, Alter MJ. Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection.Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:558–67.

2.      Missiha SB, Ostrowski M, Heathcote EJ. Disease progression in chronic hepatitis C: modifiable and nonmodifiable factors. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1699–1714.

3.      Gupta N, Kumar V, Kaur A. Seroprevalence of HIV, HBV, HCV and syphilis in voluntary blood donors. Indian J Med Sci. 2004;58:255–257.

4.      Mukhopadhya A. Hepatitis C in India. J Biosci. 2008;33:465-73.

5.      ACOG Educational Bulletin. Viral hepatitis in pregnancy.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.Int J Gynaecol Obstet.1998;63:195-202.

6.      Kamili S, Drobeniuc J, Araujo AC, Hayden TM. Laboratory diagnostics for Hepatitis C virus infection.Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55:S43-S48.

7.      Bhattacharya S, Badrinath S, Hamide A, Sujatha S. Seroprevalence of hepatitis C virus in a hospital based general population in south India. Ind J Med Microbiol.2003;21(1):43-45.

8.      Afsar I, Gungor S, Sener AG, YurtseverSG. The prevalence of HBV, HCV and HIV infections among blood donors in Izmir, Turkey.Ind J Med Microbiol. 2008;26(3):288-9.

9.      El-Hazmi MM. Prevalence of HBV, HCV, HIV-1, 2 and HTLV-I/IIinfections among blood donors in a teaching hospital in the Central region of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2004;25:26-33.

10.   Mujeeb SA, Aamir K, Mehmood K. Seroprevalence of HBV, HCV and HIV infections among college going Ž rst time voluntary blood donors. J Pak Med Assoc. 2006;56:24-5.

11.  Kumar SP, Venu G, Rao MA, Balakrishnan N, Saravanan T, Rani SA, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of Hepatitis C among maintenance haemo dialysis patients at a tertiary care hospital in Coimbatore, India. J ClinDiag Res. 2011;5(4):725-28.

12.  Salama G, Rostaing L, Sandres K, Izopet J. Hepatitis C infection in a French hemodialysis unit; a multicenter study. J Med Virol.2000;61:44-51.

13.  Jaiswal SP, Chitnis DS, Naik G, Artwani KK, Pandit CS, Salgia et al. Prevalence of anti-HCV antibodies in central India. Indian J Med Res. 1996;104:177-81.