Research Article (Open access) |
---|
Int. J. Life. Sci. Scienti. Res.,
1(1):
1-4,
September 2015
Seroprevalence of Hepatitis C Virus Among Indoor and
Outdoor Patients of A Tertiary Care Hospital: One Year Study
Tanuj Gupta1*, P.S.Gill2, Uma Chaudhary3
1Demonstrator, Department
of Microbiology, PT. B. D. Sharma PGIMS Rohtak,
Haryana, India
2Professor,
Department of Microbiology, PT. B. D. Sharma PGIMS Rohtak,
Haryana, India
3Senior Pofessor and Head of Department, Department of
Microbiology, PT. B. D. Sharma PGIMS Rohtak, Haryana,
India
Address for Correspondence: Mr. Tanuj Gupta, Demonstrator, Department of Microbiology,
PT.
B. D. Sharma PGIMS Rohtak-124001, Haryana, India
ABSTRACT-
Aim: The present study was to know the seroprevalence of Hepatitis C virus among indoor and
outdoor patients of a teaching tertiary care hospital in North India.
Study design: Place and duration of
study: Department of Microbiology, Pt. B. D. Sharma PGIMS Rohtak,
Haryana, India, between August 2013 to July 2014.
Methodology: This is a retrospective
study performed on blood samples collected from patients of all ages and both
sexes. Commercially available Erba Lisa Hepatitis C
ELISA kits were used which detects anti-HCV IgG
antibodies. Statistical analysis was performed when two or more variables were
needed to compare. SPSS version 17 was used to calculate P value.
Results: The prevalence of HCV
was 3.74% in our study. 72.7% were from males and
27.3% were from females. Highest number of positive samples was from 11-20
years age group (5.6%). The positivity for anti-HCV antibodies was higher in
indoor samples (7.8%) as compared to outdoor samples (2.3%).
Conclusion: Strict need to follow
universal precautions for HCV control and education of public so that high risk
activities should be controlled.
Key
Words: Hepatitis C virus, Seroprevalence,
anti-HCV antibodies, Indoor, HCV control
INTRODUCTION- Hepatitis C is an
infectious disease affecting the liver caused by Hepatitis C virus (HCV). HCV
is a RNA virus, heterogenous in nature showing
multiple genotypes and subtypes. HCV infection is a global health problem with
approximately 170 million persons are chronically infected worldwide, an
estimated prevalence of approximately 2% and 3 to 4 million persons newly
infected each year.1 Hepatitis C can present as acute or chronic
hepatitis. Most of the cases of acute hepatitis C are asymptomatic with
patients unaware of the underlying infection. Symptomatic acute hepatitis with
jaundice is seen in only 25% of the infected patients.
Nearly 54-86% of the
infected personprogresses to chronic hepatitis and
about one fifth of the patients develop cirrhosis. The patients with cirrhosis
are at a higher risk of developing hepatocellular
carcinoma and about 1-4% of patients are developing this complication every
year.2 HCV antibody prevalence varies from 0.4-2% in
different parts of the world. In India, prevalence rate is between 1.5-2% in
generalpopulation.3
Transmission
of HCV is primarily by parenteral route which occur byneedlestick injuries, sharing of contaminated needles in
intravenous drug addicts, ear and nose piercing, tattooing, sharing of shaving
razor, dental procedures and use of contaminated blood inblood
transfusion. Recipients
of multiple blood transfusions such as patients of thalassemia,
haemoglobinopathies, clotting disorders, patient on haemodialysis are particularly at higher risk for acquiring
HCV infection.4Other mode of transmission is vertical transmission
from infected mother to children. Approximately 7-8 percent of HCV positive women transmit HCV to
their offsprings with a higher rate of transmission
seen in women co-infected with HIV.5
Detection of Anti-HCV IgG by serological tests is the most common laboratory
procedures used for diagnosing hepatitis C. Enzyme linked immunosorbent
assay (ELISA), immunoblot assays and more recently immunechromatography based rapid tests are used for
serological testing. The most commonly used initial blood test for Hepatitis C
is ELISA. However, none of these tests have potential to discriminate between
active and resolved HCV infection.6This study was undertaken on
serum samples sent from patients admitted in different wards of our tertiary
care teaching hospital and also on patients attending outpatient departments to
know the seroprevalence of HCV.
MATERIALS AND METHODS-
Hepatitis C testing was carried out in our clinical Microbiology laboratory on
those blood samples which were collected by clinicians and received in vacutainers with no anticoagulant from the patientsadmitted
in different wards and intensive care units (ICUs) as well as patients
attending the outpatient departments. This is a retrospective study conducted
during time interval of one year from August 2013 to July 2014. Commercially available Erba
Lisa Hepatitis C ELISA kits were used which detects anti-HCV IgG antibodies. These kits are procured from Transasia Bio-Medicals Ltd, Daman. In the laboratory, serum
was extractedby centrifugation as soon as possible to
avoid haemolysis. These serum samples were numbered
and stored in refrigerator at 2-80C. When ELISA was put, these
frozen serum specimens were brought to roomtemperature and were thawed properly.
All the reagents were also brought to room-temperature and shaken well before
use. Erba Lisa Hepatitis C is based on indirect ELISA
using a solid phase prepared with the mixture of synthetic peptides and
recombinant proteins of HCV i.e. CORE, NS3, NS4 and NS5. This kit detects only IgG type of anti-HCV. The whole test was performed as per
manufacturer’s instructions. Optical density was read at 450nm by ELISA reader
and cut off value was calculated. Samples with an Optical density less than the
cut off value were considered non-reactive. Samples with an Optical density
equal to or greater than the cut off value were considered initial reactive.
These samples were retested and on retesting if the optical density was less
than the cut off value it was considered as non-reactive and if the retest cut
off value of the sample is found more then it was
considered reactive. Statistical analysis was performed when two or more
variables were needed to compare. SPSS version 17 was used to calculate P value.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION-
A total of 10750 blood samples were
received during study period for Hepatitis C testing. Out of 10750, 403 (3.74%)
samples were reactive for anti-HCV antibodies. Among 403 reactive samples, 293
(72.7%) were from males and 110 (27.3%) were from females (table 1). In terms
of P value it was extremely
significant (<0.0001). Maximum number of samples was received from age group
21-30 years (23.5%), while highest number of positive samples was from 11-20
years age group (5.6%) (Table 2). Studies from
different regions of the world show wide variation in prevalence of HCV. Study
from south India reported 4.8% seroprevalence of HCV
among hospital based general population. In the
same study, seroprevalence in males and females was
5.9% and 3.3% respectively.7 However,
low rate of anti-HCV antibody positivity among blood donors has also
been reported such as 0.34%, 0.4% and 0.5% rate from Turkey, Saudi Arabia and
Pakistan respectively.8-10 Monthwise
distribution of samples are shown in Table 3.
Table
1: Sex wise distribution of reactive samples
Total no. of samples received |
Number and percentage of Reactivesamples |
|||
10750 |
Male=7031 |
403(3.74%) |
Male=293(4.16%) |
P value <0.0001 |
Female=3719 |
Female=110(2.95%) |
Table 2: Age wise distribution of
reactive samples
Age in years |
Total no. of
samples |
Positive samples |
0-10 |
661 |
29 (4.4%) |
11-20 |
1549 |
87(5.6%) |
21-30 |
2526 |
60(2.4%) |
31-40 |
1869 |
71(3.8%) |
41-50 |
1448 |
56(3.8%) |
51-60 |
1265 |
59(4.6%) |
61-70 |
903 |
31(3.4%) |
71-80 |
358 |
07(1.9%) |
81-90 |
171 |
03(1.8%) |
Total |
10750 |
403(3.7%) |
Table 3: Monthwise distribution of
total and positive samples
Month |
Total
no. of samples |
No. and percentage of
Positive samples |
Aug
2013 |
55 |
0(0) |
Sep
2013 |
275 |
09(3.3%) |
Oct
2013 |
354 |
10(2.8%) |
Nov
2013 |
649 |
18(2.7%) |
Dec
2013 |
761 |
14(1.8%) |
Jan
2014 |
865 |
39(4.5%) |
Feb
2014 |
818 |
20(2.4%) |
March
2014 |
1201 |
29(2.4%) |
April
2014 |
1282 |
93(7.2%) |
May
2014 |
1379 |
64(4.6%) |
June
2014 |
1607 |
60(3.7%) |
July
2014 |
1504 |
47(3.1%) |
Total |
10750 |
403(3.74%) |
The positivity for anti-HCV
antibodies was higher in indoor samples (7.8%) as compared to outdoor samples
(2.3%) (Table 4 and 5). Statistically this difference was also very significant
(P value 0.0031).
Table 4: Outdoor and indoor
distribution of total and positive samples
Total outdoor |
Total
no. of samples |
No. and percentage ofPositive samples |
Surgery OPD |
3320 |
47(1.4%) |
Medicine
OPD |
1233 |
68(5.5%) |
Gynaecology
OPD |
172 |
09(5.2%) |
Paediatrics
OPD |
70 |
04(5.7%) |
Skin
OPD |
33 |
01(3%) |
ENT OPD |
3088 |
51(1.6%) |
Burn plastic surgery ward |
37 |
03(8.1%) |
GIC |
146 |
13(8.9%) |
Respiratory intensive care unit |
23 |
01(4.3%) |
Cardiovascular surgery ward |
70 |
04(5.7%) |
Orthopaedics ward |
143 |
07(4.9%) |
Gastro surgery ward |
343 |
45(13.1%) |
Nephrology ward |
104 |
06(5.7%) |
Thalassemia unit |
750 |
96(12.8%) |
Urology ward |
867 |
29(3.3%) |
Other wards |
351 |
19(5.4%) |
Table 5: Total number and percentage
of positive outdoor and indoor samples
Total outdoor samples |
Number of positive outdoor samples |
Total indoor
samples |
Number of positive indoor samples |
P value |
7916 |
180(2.3%) |
2834 |
223(7.8%) |
0.0031 |
In
our study, anti-HCV antibodies were detected in 13.1% of patients undergoing
routine dialysis in nephrology ward. Similar results has also been reported in a
study from Coimbatore in which 12.4% of patients on haemodialysiswere found to be anti-HCV positive.11 A
number of risk factors have been identified for HCV infection among the
dialysis patients, which include cross infections from the sharing of dialysismachines
and the dialysis equipment, the reprocessing of dialyzers and blood lines and
the increased requirement of blood transfusions.12, 13
Thalassemia patients are more
prone to develop HCV and other transfusion transmitted infections. In our
study, 12.8% of the thalassemia patients were found
to be positive for anti-HCV
antibodies. Unsafetherapeutic injections and not properly
screened blood used for transfusion are the predominant modalities of
transmission of Hepatitis C in India. In India, mandatoryscreening
for HCV was introduced as late as in 2002.However, now a day serological
markers for HBV, HCV and HIV are screened in blood banks routinely. The
interval from the onset of hepatitis to seroconversion
to anti-HCV antibody is 4-32 weeks. As ELISA test detects only anti-HCV
antibodies so, if the donors who are infected with Hepatitis C virus but have
not develop seroconversion they are missed by ELISA.
So, it is essential to adopt strict criteria in the selection of donors and to
avoid unnecessary transfusion.This should also be
supplemented with health education of general population to increase awareness
about this virus and its modes of transmission.
CONCLUSIONS- Although
prevalence of HCV in our study is comparable with other studies from different
parts of world, even then there is need to follow the universal precautions for
HCV control strictly.
AUTHOR’S CONTRIBUTIONS- Author 1 performed data collection, organise the data and managed the literature searches.
Author 2 designed the study, performed the statistical analysis, and wrote the
manuscript. Author 3 and Author 4 managed the analysis of the study. All
authors read and approved the final manuscript.
CONSENT- This study doesn’t involve human subjects directly. Blood samples were
taken by clinicians from patients. We performed testing on those samples which
were received in our department. So, we didn’t get consent form from patients.
ETHICAL APPROVAL- All the procedures and investigations conducted in
this study are standard and do not carry any harmful effects on the patients.
Thus the present study is well within the ethical norms and is ethically
justified. All the biomedical waste generated in the laboratory is discarded as
per the recommended guidelines. So, this study is not against the public
interest.
REFERENCES
1.
Shepard
CW, Finelli L, Alter MJ. Global epidemiology of
hepatitis C virus infection.Lancet Infect
Dis. 2005;5:558–67.
2.
Missiha
SB, Ostrowski M, Heathcote
EJ. Disease progression in chronic hepatitis C: modifiable and nonmodifiable factors. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1699–1714.
3.
Gupta N, Kumar V, Kaur
A. Seroprevalence of HIV, HBV, HCV and syphilis in
voluntary blood donors. Indian J Med
Sci. 2004;58:255–257.
4.
Mukhopadhya
A. Hepatitis C in India. J Biosci. 2008;33:465-73.
5.
ACOG Educational
Bulletin. Viral hepatitis in pregnancy.American
College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.Int J Gynaecol Obstet.1998;63:195-202.
6. Kamili S, Drobeniuc J, Araujo AC, Hayden TM. Laboratory diagnostics for Hepatitis
C virus infection.Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55:S43-S48.
7.
Bhattacharya S, Badrinath S, Hamide A, Sujatha S. Seroprevalence of hepatitis C virus in a hospital based
general population in south India. Ind J Med
Microbiol.2003;21(1):43-45.
8.
Afsar I, Gungor S, Sener AG, YurtseverSG. The prevalence of HBV, HCV and HIV infections among
blood donors in Izmir, Turkey.Ind J Med Microbiol. 2008;26(3):288-9.
9.
El-Hazmi MM. Prevalence of HBV,
HCV, HIV-1, 2 and HTLV-I/IIinfections among blood donors in a teaching hospital
in the Central region of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2004;25:26-33.
10. Mujeeb SA, Aamir K, Mehmood K. Seroprevalence of HBV, HCV and HIV infections among college
going Ž rst time voluntary blood donors. J Pak Med
Assoc. 2006;56:24-5.
11. Kumar SP, Venu G, Rao MA, Balakrishnan N, Saravanan T, Rani SA, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of Hepatitis C
among maintenance haemo dialysis patients at a
tertiary care hospital in Coimbatore, India. J ClinDiag
Res. 2011;5(4):725-28.
12. Salama G, Rostaing
L, Sandres K, Izopet J.
Hepatitis C infection in a French hemodialysis unit;
a multicenter study. J Med Virol.2000;61:44-51.
13. Jaiswal SP, Chitnis
DS, Naik G, Artwani KK, Pandit CS, Salgia et al.
Prevalence of anti-HCV antibodies in central India. Indian J Med Res. 1996;104:177-81.