SSR Inst. Int. J. Life Sci., 6(6):
2687-2693,
November 2020
Antioxidative
properties of Mucuna nivea (Roxb.) DC
by DPPH Assay
Sunil Tayade1, Kamlakar More2*,
Prashant Gawande3
1Research Scholar, Department of Botany, Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University, Amravati (M.S) India
2Assistant Professor, Department of Botany, Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University, Amravati (M.S) India
3Associate
Professor, Department of Botany, Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University, Amravati
(M.S) India
*Address for Correspondence: Dr. Kamlakar More, Assistant Professor, Department of Botany, Sant
Gadge Baba Amravati University, Amravati-444602, Maharashtra, India
E-mail: kamlakarmore@sgbau.ac.in
ABSTRACT- Background: The present study was conducted to evaluate
the antioxidative potential of leaves and seeds of Mucuna nivea due to presence of various bioactive phytoconstituents observed in preliminary phytochemical investigation.
Method: A stable free radical DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) was used as a standard oxidant to evaluate the antioxidant capacity of leaves and seeds extracted with five different solvents.
Result: The qualitative data were obtained by confirming the presence of phytoconstituents, the five different solvents viz petroleum ether, chloroform, acetone, ethanol, and methanol were chosen by increasing order of their polarity. The significant percentage of inhibition of DPPH was observed in seed extracts of petroleum ether and methanol showing 46.33% and 45.76% respectively. However, the leaves extracted in petroleum ether reveals 30.91% of inhibition followed by 29.72% of inhibition were recorded in methanolic extract of leaves. Moreover, the ascorbic acid as a standard antioxidant shows 81.46% and 80.05% inhibition of DPPH in leaves and seed extracts of solvents respectively.
Conclusion: From the observation, it can be concluded that the
seeds and leaves are the good sources for
antioxidants, for the further exploration of bioactive potential of M. nivea, the present investigation
creates a basic platform for the future investigators.
Key
Words: Antioxidants, Ascorbic Acid, Mucuna nivea, DPPH, Free radicals, Phytoconstituents
INTRODUCTION- From ancient time,
medicinal plants act as a boon for human life in the world [1]. About 75% of the global population of developed and
developing countries depends on plants derived medicines for the treatment of
various ailments, it has been estimated that the 70,000 different pants
considerably using as a medicine [2]. Most
of the pharmacological studies are based on the investigation of uses of plants
and its production for novel therapeutic drugs. Numerous health benefits have
been identified like antimicrobial,
anti-inflammatory, anti-diabetic, cancer preventive and antihypertensive
properties [3]. To
cop-up with the oxidative stress the plants synthesize various secondary
metabolites as defence molecules [4]. The oxidative environment acting as a signal for the
synthesis of antioxidants in plants as a defence molecule, the impaired
antioxidant system of an organism resulting in a diseased condition [5]. The
free radicals like superoxide radical (O2−),
hydroxyl radical (OH), peroxide radical (ROO), and nitric oxide radical
causing various pathological implications including heart diseases, reperfusion
injury, inflammation, diabetes, drug toxicity, carcinogenesis and
neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson and Alzheimer diseases [6]. The biomolecules can get oxidized
by interacting with free radicles [7]. The structural alternation in nucleic acids occurs
due to free radicals attacks [8]. The
harmful effect of free radicals or oxidants can be neutralized by increasing
the use of antioxidants derived food in daily life, an adequate amount of
antioxidants in the body can maintain healthy status due to its free radical
scavenging activity, the food processing and preservation industries
continuously use the synthetic antioxidants but also reported their side
effects and proves to carcinogenic [9]. Phytochemicals have a great
impact on different pharmaceutical products with definite therapeutic effect [10]. Polyphenols are strong
antioxidants with tremendous free radical foragers and inhibitors of lipid
peroxidation. Terpenoids are useful for curing obesity-induced metabolic
disorders [11]. Awareness
and popularization of phytoconstituents are of prime importance for developing
new drug products from medicinal plants [12]. Various medicinal plants have
been documented with antioxidants potential [13]. By considering the medicinal importance of genus Mucuna based on the earlier reports on M. pruriens. The investigation on the
antioxidant potential of M. nivea was
conducted.
MATERIAL
AND METHODS
Collection
of samples- Plant material leaves and dry pods of M. nivea (Roxb.) DC was collected from the
area near Maltekdi congress Nagar road, Amravati Maharashtra (India) in
December 2015 and according to the phonological calendar, the frequent visits
were taken to collect the samples. The assessment of antioxidative properties was
performed in the Department of Botany, Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University,
Amravati, Maharashtra, India.
Identification
of plant material- Identification of plant material was
done with the help of standard floras; the flora of British India, Flora of
Amravati District
[14]. The herbarium specimen
was prepared for individual plant and submitted to the Department of Botany,
Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University.
Sample
preparation- The collected plant parts i.e. leaves
were firstly cleaned with tap water to remove dust and other contaminants
followed by semi-hot water treatment. The cleaned plant material then subjected
to the shade drying for about 10 days. After 10 days the plant material i.e.
leaves were transferred to the oven at 400C for 2 hours to remove
the moisture content. Dried plant material was converted to powder by using
electric mixture grinder and passed through the sieve to get the similar size
particles of powder. Prepared leaves powder was stored in an airtight plastic
container and preserved in refrigerator for further experimentation. Seeds were
removed from dry pods, the immature and infected or having diseased seeds were
sorted out. The fresh and clean seeds were cut into small pieces by using
mortar and pestle and small pieces of seeds were converted into a fine powder
with the help of electric mixture grinder. Prepared seeds powder was stored in
an airtight plastic container and preserved in refrigerator for further
experimentation.
Extraction of phytochemicals- Total 10 gm powder was filled in the thimble
(made up of filter paper) and extracted successively with petroleum ether,
chloroform, acetone, ethanol, and methanol in 180 ml for 24 hours using soxhlet extraction assembly. The temperature
of the apparatus maintained at the boiling point for each solvent. The
extractions were carried out using the above mentioned different solvents with
specific characteristics of increasing values of their polarity. The obtained
extracts were filtered through Whatman filter paper no.42 for free and clear
extract. This extract then evaporated and concentrated up to 10 ml. Resultant10
ml extract again filtered and stored in small sterile airtight bottles at -40C
temperature.
Preliminary phytochemical analysis-
The
preliminary phytochemical analysis was performed for all the extracts as per
standard method [15] for testing the different chemical
groups such as alkaloids, flavonoids, phenol, tannins, glycosides, saponins,
terpenoids and steroids present in petroleum ether, chloroform, acetone, ethanol
and methanol. For every chemical group, two tests were selected for confirming
the presence of phytochemicals.
Evaluation
of antioxidant activity by DPPH- A stable free radical
DPPH (1, 1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) was used to calculate the antioxidant
activity, the effect of test samples on DPPH radical was estimated according to
the procedure described by [16]. Two ml of 6 Χ10-5 M
methanolic solution of DPPH was added to 50 ΅l of a methanolic solution (10 mg
ml-1) of the sample. Absorbance measurements commenced immediately.
The decrease of absorbance at 515 nm was continuously recorded in a
spectrophotometer for 16 minutes at room temperature. Methanolic solutions of
standard ascorbic acid were tested at 10 mg/ml concentration. The percentage of
DPPH radical scavenging ability of the sample was calculated from the
absorbance value at the end of 16 min duration. All determinations were
performed in triplicate. The percentage inhibition of the DPPH radical by the
samples was calculated according to the formula given in [17].
IP
= [{AC (0)- AA (t)/ AC(0)}] Χ 100
Where, AC (0) is the absorbance of the control at t
= 0 min
AA
(t) is the absorbance of the antioxidants at t = 16 min
Plant
under study- M. nivea belongs
to family Fabaceae and commonly called as Kuyari. Cultivated in India and
fruiting observed from December to January.
Taxonomic
Classification
Kingdom : Plantae
Division : Phanerogams
Subdivision : Angiosperms
Class : Dicotyledones
Subclass : Polypetalae
Series : Calyciflorae
Order : Rosales
Family : Fabaceae
Genus : Mucuna
Species : Nivea
Local Name : Kuyari
Fig. 1:
A) Habit of M. nivea; B) Twig of M. nivea; C) Green pod of M. nivea;D) Mature pods and seeds of M.
nivea
RESULTS-
Table 1 shows the inhibition percentage of DPPH radical scavenging activity of
leaves samples of M. nivea extracted
successively with petroleum ether, chloroform, acetone, ethanol and methanol.
Table 1:
Inhibition percentage of DPPH radical scavenging activity in five different
solvents extract of M.
nivea leaves
S.No. |
Inhibition
percentage of different extracts |
||||||||||||||
Pet. ether |
Chloroform |
Acetone |
Ethanol |
Methanol |
|||||||||||
Absorbance |
% |
Absorbance |
% |
Absorbance |
% |
Absorbance |
% |
Absorbance |
% |
||||||
C |
E |
C |
E |
C |
E |
C |
E |
C |
E |
||||||
1 |
0.436 |
0.340 |
22.01 |
0.658 |
0.516 |
21.58 |
0.141 |
0.120 |
14.89 |
0.219 |
0.170 |
23.37 |
0.142 |
0.122 |
14.08 |
2 |
0.556 |
0.329 |
40.82 |
0.679 |
0.498 |
26.65 |
0.117 |
0.120 |
32.20 |
0.263 |
0.240 |
08.74 |
0.163 |
0.098 |
39.87 |
3 |
0.515 |
0.361 |
29.90 |
0.661 |
0.473 |
28.44 |
0.154 |
0.140 |
09.09 |
0.258 |
0.152 |
41.08 |
0.159 |
0.103 |
35.22 |
Std. |
0.192 |
0.038 |
80.20 |
0.190 |
0.035 |
81.57 |
0.194 |
0.053 |
72.68 |
0.187 |
0.032 |
82.88 |
0.193 |
0.029 |
84.97 |
C= Control, E= Extract
The inhibition percentage of DPPH
radical scavenging activity was
found to be variable in different solvents, indicating that the solvent
dependant extraction of bioactive compounds from the plant parts under study.
Table 2 shows the inhibition percentage of DPPH radical scavenging activity of
seed samples of M. nivea extracted
successively with petroleum ether, chloroform, acetone, ethanol and methanol.
Table 2:
Inhibition percentage of DPPH radical scavenging activity in a different
extract of M.
nivea seeds
S.No. |
Inhibition
percentage of different extracts |
||||||||||||||
Pet. ether |
chloroform |
Acetone |
Ethanol |
Methanol |
|||||||||||
Absorbance |
% |
Absorbance |
% |
Absorbance |
% |
Absorbance |
% |
Absorbance |
% |
||||||
C |
E |
C |
E |
C |
E |
C |
E |
C |
E |
||||||
1 |
0.213 |
0.122 |
42.72 |
0.256 |
0.216 |
15.62 |
0.253 |
0.191 |
24.50 |
0.245 |
0.129 |
47.34 |
0.256 |
0.125 |
51.17 |
2 |
0.209 |
0.177 |
44.01 |
0.255 |
0.226 |
11.37 |
0.267 |
0.186 |
30.33 |
0.248 |
0.135 |
45.56 |
0.237 |
0.127 |
46.41 |
3 |
0.176 |
0.084 |
52.27 |
0.286 |
0.235 |
17.83 |
0.176 |
0.114 |
35.22 |
0.257 |
0.157 |
39.68 |
0.209 |
0.126 |
39.71 |
Std. |
0.189 |
0.027 |
85.71 |
0.177 |
0.032 |
81.92 |
0.179 |
0.069 |
74.41 |
0.195 |
0.032 |
83.59 |
0.190 |
0.033 |
82.63 |
C= Control, E= Extract
Fig. 2 shows the comparative account on
the anti-oxidative potential of leaves and seeds of M. nivea extracted in five different solvents. This comparative
data on the determination of the anti-oxidative potential of plants under
research creates attention to the researchers for further investigations.
Fig.
2:
Inhibition percentage of DPPH radical scavenging activity of different extracts
of leaves and seeds of M. nivea
DISCUSSION-
It has been observed that various methods are used by researchers to
investigate the antioxidants potential of plants. DPPH radical scavenging
activity is one of the most reliable methods to determine the antioxidants
activity of samples under investigations [18] for the assessment of
the antioxidant potential of leaves and seeds of M. nivea, the
five different solvents viz petroleum
ether, chloroform, acetone, ethanol, and methanol were chosen by increasing
order of their polarity [19]. For obtaining the basic level
phytochemical status, the qualitative assessment was performed which reveals
the presence of alkaloids, flavonoids, phenols, tannins, saponins, glycosides,
steroids and terpenoids. The antioxidant potential of M. pruriens seeds
and leaves extracts was determined by using the solvents mentioned above. DPPH was used as a stable free radical; a
freshly prepared DPPH shows a deep purple colure with absorption maxima at 517
nm [20]. During the interaction with
antioxidants, the deep purple colour is converted into colourless (i.e. 2,
2-diphenyl-1-hydrazine, or substituted analogous hydrazine), resulting in a
decrease in absorption at 517 nm [21].
For the comparative assessment of antioxidant potential, the Ascorbic acid was
used as a standard antioxidant. Inhibition percentage of DPPH radical
scavenging activity of different extracts of leaves and seeds were shown in
Table 1 and 2 and the mean value of the percentage of inhibition was shown in
Fig 2. The significant mean value of percentage of inhibition was recorded in
seed extracts of petroleum ether and methanol i. e 46.33% and 45.76%
respectively. The ascorbic acid as ac standard antioxidant shows 81.46% and
80.05% inhibition of DPPH in leaves and seed extracts of solvents respectively.
However, the leaves of petroleum ether extract reveal 30.91% of inhibitions
followed by 29.72% of inhibition in methanolic extract of leaves were observed.
Most of the researchers have characterized
M.
pruriens in earlier studies [22].
Moreover, in the acidic extract of M.
pruriens contains high phenolic compounds with antioxidant
and hepatoprotective activity [23].
Moreover, the least percentage of inhibition was observed in leaves acetonic
extracts.
CONCLUSIONS- Plants are
a rich source of antioxidants creating prime attention to redevelop the
ethnomedicine because they contain phenols, flavonoids, alkaloids, tannins,
vitamins, terpenoids, and many more phytochemicals responsible for different
pharmacological activities. From the present study, it can be
concluded that the seeds and leaves of M.
nivea are the good sources for antioxidants, and might
have a good impact on neutralization of oxidative stresses. However, the
compounds responsible for this activity are currently unclear.
The
plant's understudy needs to be further explored to reach the identification of
specific compounds responsible for bioactivity; the present investigation creates a basic platform for the future
investigators, the crude idea about antioxidants potential of plants will be
helpful for new researchers to formulate their hypothesis based on present
demands in the field of herbal medicine.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS-
The
authors are thankful to the Department of Botany, Sant Gadge Baba Amravati
University, Amravati (M.S.), India for providing laboratory facilities to carry
out the experiments.
CONTRIBUTION OF AUTHORS
Research concept-Prashant
Gawande, Kamlakar More
Research design-
Sunil Tayade, Kamlakar More
Supervision-Prashant
Gawande,
Materials-
Sunil Tayade, Kamlakar More
Data collection-
Sunil Tayade, Kamlakar More, Prashant Gawande
Data analysis and
interpretation- Sunil Tayade, Kamlakar More, Prashant
Gawande
Literature search- Sunil
Tayade, Kamlakar More
Writing article-
Kamlakar More, Sunil Tayade
Critical review-
Kamlakar More, Prashant Gawande
Article editing-
Kamlakar More
Final
approval- Prashant Gawande
REFERENCES
1.
Merlin MD. Archaeological evidence for the tradition of psychoactive plant use in
the old world. Econ Bot., 2003; 57: 295-323.
2.
Rao, VR, Arora RK. Rationale for
conservation of medicinal plants. In: Medicinal Plants Research in Asia. The
Framework and Project Workpants. International Plant Genetic Resources
Institute, Regional Office for Asia, the Pacific and Oceania (IPGRI-APO).
Malaysia, 2004; 1: 9.
3.
Kasote DM,
Katyare SS, Hegde MV, Bae H. Significance of antioxidant potential of plants
and its relevance to therapeutic applications. Int J Biol Sci., 2015; 11: 982.
4.
Santos HFD,
Campos JF, Santos CMd, Balestieri JBP, Silva DB, et al. Chemical profile and
antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimutagenic and antimicrobial activities of
geopropolis from the stingless bee. Melipona orbignyi. Int J Mol Sci., 2017;
18: 953.
5.
Agbafor KN, Nwachukwu N. Phytochemical
Analysis and Antioxidant Property of Leaf Extracts of Vitex Doniana and Mucuna
Pruriens, Biochem Res Int., 2011; 459839. doi: 10.1155/2011/459839.
6.
Aruoma OI. Free radicals, oxidative
stress and antioxidants in human health and disease. J Am Oil Chem Soc.,
1998; 75(2): 199212.
7.
Lobo V, Phatak A, Chandra N. Free
radicals and functional foods: Impact on human health. Pharmacog Rev., 2010; 4: 118126.
8.
Dizdaroglu M, Jaruga P, Birincioglu M,
Rodriguez H. Free radical-induced damage to DNA: mechanisms and measurement.
Free Rad Biol Med., 2002;
32(11): 110215.
9.
Anagnostopoulou MA, Kefalas P, Papageorgiou
VP. Radical scavenging activity of various extracts and fractions of sweet
orange peel (Citrus sinensis). Food Chem., 2006; 94(1):
19-25.
10. Toumy El S, Sharabasy El F, Ghanem H, Kady El M,
Kassem A. Chemical constituents and pharmacological activities of Zilla spinosa.
Planta Med., 2011; 77: 51.
11. Song J, Yeo SG, Hong EH, Lee BR, Kim JW, et al.
Antiviral activity of hederasaponin B from Hedera helix against enterovirus 71
subgenotypes C3 and C4a. Biomol Ther., 2014; 22: 41.
12. Savithramma N, Rao ML, Suhrulatha D. Screening of
medicinal plants for secondary metabolites. Middle East J Sci Res., 2011; (8):
57984.
13. Kazeem MI, Ashafa AOT. Antioxidant and inhibitory
properties of Dombeya burgessiae leaf extracts on enzymes linked to diabetes
mellitus, Trans R Soc S Afr., 2016(71): 16774.
14. Dhore
MA. Flora of Amravati District With special reference to the distribution of
free species, Amravati University Publication, 2002.
15. Canadanovic
B J, Cetkovic G, Djilas S, Tubas V, Bodanovic G, et al. Radical scavenging, antibacterial
and antiproliferative activities of Melissa
officinalis L. extracts. J Med Food, 2008; 11(1): 133-43.
16.
Toumy El S,
Sharabasy El F, Ghanem H, Kady El M, Kassem A. Chemical constituents and
pharmacological activities of Zilla spinosa. Planta Med., 2011; 77: 51.
17. Yen
GC, Duh PD. Scavenging effect of methanolic extracts of peanut hulls on
free-radical and active-oxygen species., Food Chem., 1994; (42): 629-32.
18. Rice-Evans
CA, Miller J, Bolwell PG., Bramley P.M, and Pridham J. B. The relative
antioxidant activities of plant-derived polyphenolic flavonoids. Free Rad Res., 1995; 22(4): 37583.
19. Canadanovic
B J, Cetkovic G, Djilas S, Tubas V, Bodanovic G, MANDIC A, et al. Radical
scavenging, antibacterial and antiproliferative activities of Melissa officinalis L. extracts. J Med
Food, 2008; 11(1): 133-43.
20. Topal M, Gocer H, Topal F, et al. Antioxidant,
antiradical, and anticholinergic properties of cynarin purified from the
Illyrian thistle (Onopordum illyricum
L.). J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem., 2016; 31: 26675.
21. Amarowicz
R, Pegg BR, Rahimi MP, Bar B, Weil JA. Free-radical scavenging capacity and
antioxidant activity of selected plant species from the Canadian prairies. Food
Chem., 2003; 84: 551-62.
22. Joy GL, Elisa P, de Lima JJ, Bileski-Candida LM.. In vitro evaluation of Mucuna pruriens (L.) DC antioxidant activity. Braz J Pharm Sci., 2011; 47: 3.
23. Obogwu
MB, Akindele AJ, Adeyemi OO. Hepatoprotective and in
vivo Antioxidant Activities of the Hydroethanolic Leaf Extract of Mucuna Pruriens (Fabaceae) in
Antitubercular Drugs and Alcohol Models. Chin J Nat Med., 2014; 12(4): 273-83.