Research Article (Open access) |
---|
SSR Inst. Int. J. Life.
Sci., 5(1):
2140-2147,
January 2019
Diversity of
Molluscan communities in Kondakarla Freshwater Lake, Visakhapatnam, Andhra
Pradesh
Amaravathi D 1*, P S Raja Sekhar2, Rama Rao K3
1Lecturer, Department of
Biological Sciences, Chaitanya College of Education, PS Bonagi, Parawada,
Visakhapatnam, India
2Professor, Department of
Environmental Sciences, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, India
3Asstant Professor,
Department of Zoology, SR & BGNR Govt. Degree College, Khammam, Telangana
State, India
*Address for Correspondence: Amaravathi D, Lecturer,
Department of Biological Sciences, Chaitanya College of Education, PS Bonagi,
Parawada, Visakhapatnam, India
E-mail: drkarriramarao@gmail.com
ABSTRACT-
Background: Kondakarla Lake is
the second largest natural fresh water lake in Andhra Pradesh, India located at
a distance of 42 km from Visakhapatnam. The
molluscan faunal diversity was investigated during the study period from July
2012 to June 2014. The study aimed to keep records mainly on the
taxonomy, distribution, status, and conservation need of the different species.
Methods: Samples were
collected with the help of local people by using Peterson’s grab sampler, Surber
and D-Frame. The collected samples were washed and preserved in plastic screw
cap bottles and preserved in 70 - 80% ethyl alcohol and in 5% formalin
solution.
Results: Altogether 14 species of these 28.57% of class Bivalvia and 71.429% of Gastropoda were recorded
at four selected stations. Order Mesogastropoda
dominant with 2 families which contributed to 50% of the total population
followed by Trigoinoida and Bsommatophora each contributed to 25%.
The number and Percentage composition of Population Status were recorded during
the study period. The recorded range of
various diversity indexes were noted at different seasons.
Conclusion: Kondakarla freshwater
lake consisting of 28.571% of class
Bivalvia and 71.429% of gastropoda was recorded at four stations during the
study period. The Population Status was 07.143% abundant, 57.143% species were
common, 21.429% species were moderate and 14.286% species were rare in the
total catch.
Keywords: Bivalvia, Diversity Index, Gastropoda, Population Status, Mollusca
INTRODUCTION- The Indian freshwater
community is a rich diversity of molluscs, representing 212 species belonging
to 21 families, 164 species were recorded from rivers and streams [1].
Approximately 5,000 species of freshwater snails were inhabitant lakes, ponds,
and streams worldwide [2]. Freshwater mussels are soft-bodied
animals that are usually producing an external skeleton is composed of a limy
material or calcium carbonate, which serves both protective and supportive
purposes. Freshwater molluscs grouped into two main classes i.e. Bivalves, and
Gastropods. These are found in a wide range of freshwater habitats and have
varied life history strategies, with lifespan that vary from species to species
three months i.e. pea clams, 120 years for pearl mussels. They find their
highest levels of endemism and diversity in ancient lakes, large river basins,
and artesian basins and all of these habitats can be found within the Eastern
Mediterranean region [3]. The freshwater snails are bioindicators
and play a crucial role in the natural ecosystem. They are saprophytic animals
and purify water bodies as they consume algae, zooplankton, diatoms, and
organic waste. They provide food for many kinds of animals such as fish, birds
and also for human beings and they are part of food webs [4,5].
Being mollusks are significant to humans throughout history food source, tools,
jewelry, and even pets [6]. The present study aimed to keep records
mainly on the taxonomy, distribution, status, and conservation need of the
different species found at Kondakarla
freshwater lake.
MATERIALS AND METHOD- Study Area- Kondakarla Lake is the second largest natural fresh water
lake in Andhra Pradesh located at a distance of 42 km from Visakhapatnam and 7
km from Anakapalle. It is located north-east of Kondakarla village, lies
between latitudes 17°35'30" and 17°36'02" N, and longitudes 82°59̕
27˝ and 83°1̕ 0˝ E. Samplings were
done between 6.30 am and 11.30 am on every bimonthly
and analysed in department of Environmental sciences laboratory, Andhra
University. Four stations were
selected for the present study
to the collection of Molluscans during the period June 2012 to May 2014. They are
(Station 1- Kakarapalli (E), Station II- Kondakarla Bird sanctuary (W), Station III -
Vadrapalli (N), Station IV - Avasomavaram (S) (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1: Kondakarla Ava Freshwater lake study area
Collection, Preservation, and
Identification- Molluscans were
collected from each sampling site with the help of local people by using the
boat, nylon scoop net, gloves, Peterson’s grab sampler, Surber and D-Frame. The
Specimens were assembled to use hand-picking and scoop method, and collected
samples were washed and preserved in plastic screw cap bottles and preserved in
70 - 80% ethyl alcohol and in 5% formalin solution [7]. Diversity
was estimated by counting the total number of species per square meter for each
sample. The specimens were categorized and identified on the basis of
characteristics of the shell such as shape, size, color, and ornamentation of
coiled shell [8-12]. Other characteristics include whorls as
rounded, angular, keel over including shape, length and number of the spire,
aperture as sinistral/dextral, opercula (trap door) absence/presence and their
shape. Few minute characteristics such as the size and shape of apex, suture
deepness, low, the shape, position, size of umbilicus and columellar,
Imperforated and perforated, the outer covering (periostracum), pigment,
patterning (ribbed and striated), eye and tentacle position were also studied
this course of work [13,14]. The mathematical expression of Shannon- Wiener Index (H), Simpson Index, Menhinick Index, Buzas and Gibson’s Index, and
Evenness was calculated by using online calculator [15].
RESULTS- The present study revealed, the occurrence of fourteen species
belongs to two classes, three orders, four families and ten genera. List of molluscan fauna including their
Class, order, family, genus, species and IUCN status were recorded in the
present investigation was given in Table 1. 28.57% of class Bivalvia and 71.42%
of gastropoda was recorded at four stations during the study period. The listed
species are Lamellidens corrianus, Lamellidens marginalis, Parreysia
favidens, Parreysia corrugate, Bellamya
bengalensis, Bellamya dissimilis, Thiara (Melanoides) tuberculata, Tarebia granifera, Tarebia granifera, Bithynia pulchella, Pila globosa, Lymnaea acuminate, Gyraulus convexiusculus and Indoplanorbis exustus.
Table 1: List of
molluscans and their class, order, family, genus, species, population status
and IUCN status at Kondakarla Lake
|
Taxa |
Population Status |
IUCN 2018-1 |
Class:
Bivalvia |
|
||
Order:
Trigoinoida |
|
||
Family– Unionidae |
Lamellidens corrianus |
C |
LC |
|
Lamellidens marginalis |
C |
LC |
|
Parreysia
favidens |
M |
LC |
|
Parreysia
corrugata |
C |
LC |
Class: Gastropoda |
|
||
Order: Mesogastropoda |
|
||
Family– Viviparidae |
Bellamya bengalensis |
M |
LC |
|
Bellamya dissimilis |
M |
LC |
Family-
Thiaridae |
Thiara rudis |
R |
LC |
|
Thiara (Melanoides) tuberculata |
C |
LC |
|
Tarebia granifera |
R |
LC |
|
Bithynia pulchella |
C |
LC |
|
Pila globosa |
C |
LC |
Order:
Bsommatophora |
|
||
Family– Planorbidae |
Lymnaea acuminata |
C |
LC |
|
Gyraulus convexiusculus |
C |
LC |
|
Indoplanorbis exustus |
A |
LC |
LC- Least concern; A=
Abundant (76-100%); C = Common (51-75%); M = Moderate (26-50%); R = Rare
(1-25%) of the total catch
In the present investigation, the number and percentage
composition of families, genera, and species under different orders are shown
in Table 2 and Fig 2, 3, 4. Order Mesogastropoda
dominant with 2 families which contributed to 50% of the total population
followed by Trigoinoida and Bsommatophora each with one, which
contributed to 25%. Recorded orders Mesogastropoda
dominant with 5 genera which contributed to 50% of the total population
followed by Bsommatophora with 3
contributed to 30% and Trigoinoida
with 2 contributed to 20%. Order Mesogastropoda dominant with 7 species,
which contributed to 50% of the total population followed by Trigoinoida with 4, which contributed
to 28.57% and Bsommatophora with 3
contributed to 21.43%.
Table 2: The number and percent
composition of families, genera and species of Molluscans under various orders
S.
No. |
Order |
Families
(%) in an order |
Genera
(%) in an order |
Species
(%) in an order |
1 |
Trigoinoida |
25 |
20 |
28.57 |
2 |
Mesogastropoda |
50 |
50 |
50 |
3 |
Bsommatophora |
25 |
30 |
21.43 |
In the present study, the number and percent composition of genera
and species under various families were represented in Table 3 and Fig. 5, 6.
The generic composition of Molluscans belonging to different families shows
that ten genera were recognized. The highest genera under Thiaridae contributed
to 4, which contributed to 40% followed by Planorbidae with 3 contributed to
30%, Unionidae with 2 contributed to 20% and Viviparidae with one, which
contributed to 10%.
Table 3: Number and percent composition
of genera and species under various families
S. No. |
Families |
Genera in a family (%) |
Species in a family (%) |
1 |
Unionidae |
20 |
28.57 |
2 |
Viviparidae |
10 |
14.29 |
3 |
Thiaridae |
40 |
35.71 |
4 |
Planorbidae |
30 |
21.43 |
The number and percentage composition of population status is one
species were abundant, which contributed to 7.14%, 08 species were common,
which contributed to 57.14%, three species moderate which contributed to 21.43%
and two species rare, which contributed to 14.29% in the total population
(Table 4, Fig. 7). According to IUCN [24] all 14 species of both
classes were Least Concern (LC) Table 1. On
an average of various diversities, indexes
were
analyzed during the study period from July 2012 to June
2014. The recorded range of Shannon’s Index (H), Simpson Index,
Menhinick Index, Buzas, and Gibson’s Index of class Bivalvia was 1.30 – 0.18 and gastropoda is 2.21 – 0.11. The calculate range
in various orders i.e. Trigoinoida
was 1.36 – 0.18, Mesogastropoda was 01.83 – 0.16, Bsommatophora was 1.09- 0.32.
Evenness is nearly similar in all classes and orders Table 5, Fig. 8, 9.
Table 4: The number and percentage composition of Population Status
in the total population
Population Status |
A (76 - 100%) |
C (51 - 75%) |
M (26 - 50%) |
R (1 - 25%) |
Number of species |
01 |
08 |
03 |
02 |
Composition (%) |
7.14 |
57.14 |
21.43 |
14.29 |
A=Abundant, C= Common, M= Moderate, R= Rare
Fig. 7: Number and percentage composition of Population Status
Table 5: Average diversity indexes from July 2012 to June 2014 in Kondakarla Ava Lake
Diversity Index |
Class |
Orders |
|||
Bivalvia |
Gastropoda |
Trigoinoida |
Mesogastropoda |
Bsommatophora |
|
Shannon’s Index (H) |
1.36 |
2.21 |
1.36 |
1.83 |
1.09 |
Evenness E=H/Hmax |
0.98 |
0.96 |
0.98 |
0.94 |
0.99 |
Simpson Index |
0.18 |
0.11 |
0.18 |
0.16 |
0.32 |
Menhinick Index |
1.27 |
1.10 |
1.27 |
0.99 |
0.52 |
Maralef Richness Index |
1.30 |
2.04 |
1.30 |
1.53 |
0.57 |
Buzas and Gibson’s Index |
0.98 |
0.91 |
0.98 |
0.89 |
0.99 |
Fig. 8: Diversity Index in different classes Fig. 9: Diversity Index
in different orders
DISCUSSIONS- The similar
observations were made reported by Subba
[16] was identified ten freshwater molluscs, nine species belonging
to six families viz. Planorbidae, Viviparidae, Pilidae, Lymnaedae and Thiaridae
of class Gastropoda and one species is of family Amblemidae of the class
Bivalvia. Seba Roy and Gupta [17] reported a total of 16 molluscan taxa belonging to 2 classes, viz., Gastropoda,
and Bivalvia, 4 orders, 5 families and 9 genus were recorded from 12 different
sites, of the 16 species, 5 gastropods and 2 bivalves were recorded in a few
sites only and appeared to be sensitive to anthropogenic disturbances. Raina et
al. [18] recorded
17 species and identified from
nine families in Sip River is a tributary of River Narmada. The
documentation of bivalve as a whole during the period of study was less
dominant as compared to Gastropoda. Similar reports were observed by Khade and
Mane [19] studied the diversity of bivalve and gastropod Molluscs
from mangrove habitat, rocky substrata, sandy beach, and muddy habitat was
studied. The 22% bivalves while 78% gastropods were recorded.
Ercan et al. [20] reported the freshwater mussel fauna of Turkey has hitherto received little attention. Five native mussel species belonging to 3 genera were encountered in surveys: Anodonta cygnea, A. anatina, Unio pictorum, U. crassus, and Dreissena polymorpha. In addition, an invasive species from Asia, A. woodiana, was recorded in the region for the first time. Pir et al. [21] investigated on the distribution of molluscans in Narmada River, where as Biju et al. [22] recorded on molluscs collected from the Bharathapuzha River, Kerala [23] noted on a collection of freshwater Molluscs from Lahore.
In this present study, the number and percentage composition of
families, genera, and species under different orders similarities were
identified by various investigators.
Burdi et al. [25]
noted a total of four genera including seven species of pelecypods were
identified where Parreysia (Radiatula) wynegungansis was found most dominant.
Pelecypod populations were fairly good and more or less same numbers of
individuals were recorded. Negi and Mamgain
[26] were reported to assess the benthic
macro-invertebrates from the Tons river, is to be inversely correlated with the maximum diversity of benthos at the upstream
site ('H' 0.204) during
the winter season while it was recorded minimum
during the
rainy season at all the sites. Maximum diversity is reported during the winter season at all the sites. Kakar
et al. [27] reported
species diversity indices of freshwater in different sites of Balochistan
province, Kumar and Vyas [28] investigated on diversity index of
molluscan communities in Narmada River.
CONCLUSIONS- Kondakarla freshwater lake consisting of 28.571% of class Bivalvia and 71.429% of Gastropoda was recorded
at four stations during the study period. The Population Status is 07.143%
abundant, 57.143% species were common, 21.429% species were moderate and
14.286% species were rare in the total catch. This study concluded that the presence of diversified Molluscan community
indicated that the lake is a good potential bioindicator.
Further investigations on habitat wise
preferences with life cycles of mollusc fauna could provide insights into their
conservation and an important food resource to migratory birds of the
Kondakaral Lake.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS- The author would like to thank the administrators of Chaitanya
College of Education for granting the necessary permission towards pursuing the
Ph. D. We extend our thanks to the Head, Dept. of Environmental Sciences,
Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, for support and facilities provided for
conducting this research study.
CONTRIBUTION OF AUTHORS
Research concept- First
Report of Molluscans from Kondakarla Lake
Research design- Amaravathi
D
Supervision- Prof. PS Raja Sekhar
and Dr. K. Rama Rao
Materials- Dr. K. Rama Rao
Data collection- Kondakarla
Lake
Data analysis- Online
software and scientific calculator
Literature search- Andhra
University central Library and Biological Abstracts
Writing article- Dr. K. Rama
Rao
Critical review- Not
Sufficient Literature
Article editing- Dr. K. Rama
Rao
Final approval- Dr. K. Rama Rao, Dr. Amaravathi D
REFERENCES
1. Rao NVS. Recent Advance in Freshwater Biology. 2: In K.S. (ed.), New Delhi, India, Anmol Publications, 1993; pp. 187-201.
2. Abbott RT. Snail invaders. Natural History, 1950; 59: pp. 80–85.
3.
Seddon M. Molluscan
biodiversity and the impact of large dams (Thematic Review II. I
prepared as an input to the World Commission on Dams). World Commission on Dams, Cape Town, South Africa, 2000.
4. Harman WN. Pollution Ecology of Freshwater Invertebrates; Snails (Mollusca: Gastropoda), in C.W. Hart and S.L.H. Fuller (eds.), Academic Press, New York, 1974; 275-302.
5.
Burdi
GH, Baloch WA, Begum F. Ecologicalstudies of
freshwater mussels History. (pelecypoda) of Indus River and its canal at Kotri
barrage Sindh, Pakistan. Sindh Uni. Res. J., 2008; 41: 31-36.
6.
Biju
KA, Sushama S, Biswas T. Molluscs collected from the
Bharathapuzha river, Kerala. J. Inland Fish. Soc. India, 2008; 33(2): 68-69.
7. Kamran K, Kakar A, Arif S, Iqbal A. Evaluation of insect repellent and insecticide implantation
techniques against Aeolesthes sarta Solsky in Quetta district of Baluchistan
province, Pakistan, J. of Ent. And Zoo. Stu., 2017; 5(2): 273-76.
8.
Annandale
N, Prashad B. The Mollusca of the inland waters of
Balochistan and of Seistan. Records of the Indian Museum, 1919; 18: 17-64.
9.
Annandale
N, Prashad B. Some freshwater Mollusca from the Bombay
precidency. Records of the Indian Museum, 1919; 16: 139-52.
10.
Dey RA. Hand book on India
Fresh Water Molluscs. Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta, 2007.
11.
Subba
R. Hand book of freshwater molluscs of India. Zoological Survey of
India, Calcutta 1989; pp. 1-289.
12.
Preston
HB. The Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma. Mollusca
(Freshwater Gastropoda and pelecypoda). Taylor and Francisco, London, 1915; pp.
1-244.
13.
Rao NVS. Fresh water
Molluscs of India. Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta: 1993; 1-289.
14.
Tonapi GT. Freshwater animal
of Indian Ecological approach, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. New Delhi, 1980;
1-341.
15.
Young TM. Biodiversity
Calculator for the Simpson and Shannon Indexes. Formula and Manual for the
Calculation of Shannon-Wiener Index Alpha Biodiversity [ᾳ], 2017; pp. 4.
16.
Subba
BR. Molluscan Check List of Ghodaghodi Tal Area, Kailali District. Our
Nature, 2003; 1: 1-2.
17.
Roy S, Gupta A. Molluscan
diversity in River Barak and its tributaries, Assam, India, Assam Uni. J. Sci. and Tech. Bio.
Env. Sci., 2010; 5(1):
109-13.
18. Raina RK, Vyas V, Swarup A, Gurjar P.
Molluscan Diversity in River Sip-A Tributary of River Narmada in Central India,
Int. J. Pure App. Bio. Sci., 2016; 4(5): 108-13.
19.
Khade SN, Mane UH. Diversiversity of Bivalve and Gastropod, Molluscs
of some localities from Raigarh district, Maharashtra, west coast of India.
Recent Res. Sci. and Tech., 2017; 4(10): 43-48.
20.
Ercan
E, Gaygusuz O, Tarkan AS, Richard M, Smith C. The ecology of freshwater
bivalves in the Lake Sapanca Basin, Turkey. Turk. J.
Zool., 2013; 37: 730-38.
21.
Pir Z, Ali I, Mudgal LK,
Seddique A. Distribution of Molluscans in Narmada River, India, Researcher, 2010; 2(10): 41-46.
22.
Biju KA, Sushama S, Biswas
T. Molluscs collected from the Bharathapuzha River, Kerala. J. Inland Fish. Soc. India, 2001; 33(2): 68-69.
23.
Akhtar S. On a collection of
freshwater Molluscs from Lahore. Biologia., 1978; 24: 437-47.
24. IUCN Red List of
threatened species, version 2018.1. www.iucnredlist.org down loaded on Nov, 2018.
25. Burdi GH, Baloch WA, Begum F, Soomro AN, Khuhawar MY. Ecological Studies on Freshwater Bivalve
mussels (Pelecypoda) of Indus River and its Canals at Kotri Barrage Sindh,
Pakistan. Sindh Univ. Res.
Jour. (Sci. Ser.), 2009; 41(1): 31-36.
26. Negi RK, Mamgain S. Seasonal Variation of Benthic Macro Invertebrates from
Tons River of Garhwal
Himalaya Uttarakhand, Pakistan, J. Bio.
Sci., 2013; 16(22): 510-16.
27.
Kakar S, Kamran K, Essote
SA, Iqbal A, Ali M. Species diversity of freshwater snails (Mollusca:
Gastropoda) in different sites of Balochistan, Province of Pakistan, IJB, 2017;
10 (3): 251-59.
28.
Kumar A, Vyas V. Diversity
of molluscan communities in River Narmada, India. J. Che. Bio. Phy. Sci., 2012;
2(3): 1407-12.