Research Article (Open access)

SSR Inst. Int. J. Life Sci., 9(5): 3299-3306, September 2023

Effect of Combined Treatment of Massage, Exercise and KIASTM with That of Only Exercise in Patients with Diastasis Recti

Pooja Pandey Tripathi*

Department of Physiotherapy, RGUHS University, Bangalore, India

 

*Address for Correspondence: Dr. Pooja Pandey Tripathi, Department of Physiotherapy, RGUHS University, Bangalore, India

E-mail: drpoojapandey@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT Background: Diastasis rectus abdominis (DRA) is a common problem in pregnant and post-partum women caused by hormonal stress. It affects pelvic stability and posture. Non-surgical interventions like abdominal exercises, mild aerobic exercises, and the Cyriax1 cross-friction massage technique improve muscle strength, reduce back pain, and decrease abdominal separation. Kinesio Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (KIASTM) can also help reduce pain and improve compliance. To analyze the efficacy of Kinesio Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization as a part of physiotherapy in patients with diastasis recti.

Methods: A retrospective study analyzed patient data from November 2022 to April 2023, focusing on diastasis recti. Initial measurements and assessments were conducted on two groups: Study group (n=41) received massage, exercises, and Kinesio Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (KIASTM), while the Control group (n=39) received exercise and massage only. Measurements were taken before and after treatment, and the significance of KIASTM was statistically analyzed. Patients with chronic systemic conditions were excluded.

Results: The study showed significant differences (p<0.05) between the two groups in most parameters assessed, except for "Finger Measurements Vertical (Before)" and "Inch measurements before treatment (above umbilicus)" (p>0.05). Parameters like "Finger Measurements Vertical (After),""Inch measurements before and after treatment", "Days of treatment," and "Depth before (in cm)" showed significant differences (p<0.05) between the two groups.

Conclusion: The study has concluded that KIASTM significantly reduces the diastasis recti and achieves other desirable outcomes.

Keywords: Massage, Diastasis Recti, Rectus abdominis, Physiotherapy, Soft Tissue Mobilization

INTRODUCTION- Diastasis rectus abdominis (DRA) is a common health problem in both post-partum and pregnant women [1,2]. Determination of DRA is accomplished by using a separation criterion of more than 2 cm at points of linea alba [2-4]. DRA is frequent and negatively affects women's health during pregnancy and after [5,6]. It develops during the second trimester. 66% to 100% experience DRA in their third trimester, and 53% suffer just after giving birth [7-10]. Hormones, including relaxin, progesterone, and estrogen, exert mechanical stress over the abdominal wall during gestation. Displacement in abdominal organs causes elastic changes in connective tissue, ultimately causing DRA [11,12]. Multiple pregnancies, polyhydramnios, flaccid abdominal muscles, microsomia and obesity are some predisposing factors [13-17]. These changes affect the stretches and lengthen the rectus abdominis of women during [2,3,18]. Ultimately, functional strength and mechanical control of the abdominal wall decreases, resulting in diastasis recti [10,19]. DR cause impaired pelvic stability and alteration in posture, making the pelvis and lumbar spine vulnerable to injury [20-22]. It can also result in defecting trunk side bending, rotation, parturition, elimination, and respiration [21,23]. Moreover, DR may cause post-partum women severe health complications in the lower back and cosmetic defects [24,25]. These women suffer acute pain in the abdomen and pelvic region. In several cases, DR is unresolved but can last for many years [26].

Abdominal and aerobic exercises can be preferred as non-surgical interventions for treating women with DRA [27-29]. The change in the muscles after exercising strengthens its contractile tissue. Therapeutic exercises lead to the activation of Slow Twitch (ST) as well as Fast Twitch (FT) fibres in skeletal muscles, thereby improving muscular strength [30]. A core exercising routine can be proven helpful in treating DRA as it reduces back pain [31,32]. Strengthening the lower abdomen's core muscles helps develop a muscular corset in the postnatal period. This periodic physical movement alleviates muscle toning, reducing abdominal separation [33]. Moreover, therapeutic exercises help in reducing DRA by 2 cm because of routine stabilization exercises and abdominal bracing [34,35].

The Cyriax1 cross-friction massage is the ancestor of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (KIASTM), which uses hard tools to manipulate soft tissue [36]. It has recently gained popularity as an alternative to conventional manual therapy methods. The same studies that revealed KIASTM improves the healing process through enhanced fibroblast proliferation [3,14] and higher collagen synthesis, maturation, and alignment apply to all of these techniques and businesses, as well as others [35,36], despite instrument and protocol variations. KIASTM may be therapeutically beneficial in treating non-specific thoracic discomfort in adults and groups with tendinopathy. Furthermore, pain negatively impacts patient compliance; as a result, using KIASTM to reduce pain may increase treatment compliance.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS Research Design- The study was conducted retrospectively by extracting the data of the patients who visited the author from November 2022 to April 2023. The details of the patients were considered. At initial visit before the treatment was started, the patients underwent series of measurements including horizontal and vertical finger measurements of the diastasis recti, measurement of the same in inches, depth of the diastasis recti and presence of hernia. The patients were randomized into either of 2 groups the Study group (n=41) or Control group (n=39). The Study group received massage, scheduled exercises and KIASTM.

 

Interventions- Core activation exercises, abdominal and diaphragmatic breathing exercises were given. But the patients were never given back extension exercises and were told not to bend forwards (bend your knees and go down). The patients were given massage, including abdominal massage and taping, in case of a few cases or asked to wear an umbilical belt during treatment. KIASTM is a manual therapy technique that utilizes specially designed instruments to mobilize soft tissue. The treatment is usually administered by a trained healthcare professional, such as a physical therapist, chiropractor, or sports medicine physician. During the treatment, the practitioner uses the instruments to apply pressure and scrape the skin in a specific pattern over the affected area. This helps to break up scar tissue and adhesions, increase blood flow, and improve range of motion. The treatment is typically performed for 5-10 minutes, with multiple sessions often required for optimal results. The exact technique and duration of treatment may vary depending on the patient's condition and the practitioner's assessment. The Control group received only exercise and massage. Each patient received treatment based on the severity and requirement. The measurements which were conducted before the treatments, were also being determined after the treatment in both groups. The measurements were statistically analyzed to find out the significance of KIASTM.

 

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria- The diastasis recti patients who visited the author's clinic were only included in this study. The patients who continued and followed-up with the treatment had shared all the required information that were only included. The patients with underlying chronic systemic conditions did not continue or visit the author for follow-up measurements, did not share all the required information, were excluded from the study.

 

Statistical Analysis- The study used SPSS 25 for effective analysis. The continuous data were expressed as mean standard deviation, while the discrete data were expressed as frequency and its respective percentage. The study employed one-way ANOVA as a statistical tool for analyzing the measurements between the two groups. The level of significance considered was p<0.05.

 

Ethical Approval- The author obtained consent from all the patients during their treatment schedules. The study used the patients' data, maintaining the privacy of the patient's details.

 

RESULTS- Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of patients in the study group (n=41) and control group (n=39). The characteristics include age, BMI, baby weight, twin delivery, education level, ability to lift heavy, Beighton test results for hypermobility, physical activity level, and type of delivery. The mean age was similar between the groups, and both groups had a similar distribution of Education, Physical Activity, and kind of delivery. The study group had a slightly higher BMI and a higher percentage of hypermobility and ability to lift heavy compared to the control group.

 

Table 1: Baseline characteristics of the patients in each group

Characteristic

Study Group

N = 41

Control Group

N = 39

Age

38.39 6.26

37.87 4.38

BMI

25.62 3.2

25.12 3.6

Weight of the baby

2.9 0.4

2.8 0.5

Twin Delivery, n (%)

1 (2.43)

0

Education

 

 

Higher Education and below, n (%)

4 (9.75)

5 (12.8)

Graduate and above, n (%)

37 (90.24)

34 (87.17)

Ability to lift heavy

Yes, n (%)

15 (36.58)

12 (30.76)

No, n (%)

26 (63.41)

27 (69.23)

Beighton Test (Hypermobility)

Not hypermobile, n (%)

8 (19.51)

9 (23.08)

Hypermobility, n (%)

33 (80.49)

30 (76.92)

Physical Activity (≥ 30 minutes)

Regular, n (%)

4 (9.76)

3 (7.69)

Irregular, n (%)

16 (39.02)

14 (35.9)

No activity, n (%)

21(51.22)

22 (56.41)

Type of Delivery

Vaginal, n (%)

7 (17.07)

5 (12.82)

Cesarean, n (%)

34 (82.93)

34 (87.18)

 

Table 2 displays the pre-treatment measures of the study group, revealing that their finger and inch measurements were comparatively smaller than those of the control group. Following the intervention, there was a notable decrease in the measurements of the study group. Again, the control group exhibited an increase in their respective values. The study group exhibited a shorter treatment time, decreased depths before and during treatment and marginally less severe hernia severity than the control group.

 

Table 2: Mean values of each parameter of the patients in both the groups

Parameter

Study Group

Control Group

Finger Measurements Horizontal (Before)

5.26 1.88

8.54 2.39

Finger Measurements Vertical (Before)

8.83 2.26

8.87 1.47

Finger Measurements Horizontal (After)

1.67 1.08

1.5 0.79

Finger Measurements Vertical (After)

2.1 0.86

3.97 0.84

Inch measurements before treatment (at umbilicus)

36.93 4.01

38.66 2.39

Inch measurements before treatment (above the umbilicus)

35.99 4.21

36.75 2.61

Inch measurements before treatment (below the umbilicus)

38.32 4.22

40.8 2.37

Inch measurements after treatment (at umbilicus)

33.63 3.65

37.29 2.44

Inch measurements after treatment (above the umbilicus)

33.09 3.52

35.41 2.59

Inch measurements after treatment (below umbilicus)

35.05 3.99

39.53 2.35

Days of treatment

7.73 2.25

13.74 4.15

Depth before (cm)

6.55 2.03

8.15 1.99

Depth after (cm)

2.01 0.8

6.3 1.58

Hernia

1.88 0.33

1.97 0.16

 

Table 3 displays the results of a significance test conducted on various parameters between two groups. The study also found that there is a significant difference (p<0.05) between the two groups in most of the parameters assessed, except for the "Finger Measurements Vertical (Before)" and "Inch measurements before treatment (above the umbilicus)" (p>0.05). Again, the study found that parameters like "Finger Measurements Vertical (After), Inch measurements before treatment (at umbilicus), Inch measurements before treatment (below umbilicus), Inch measurements after treatment (at umbilicus), Inch measurements after treatment (above umbilicus), Inch measurements after treatment (below umbilicus), Days of treatment," and "Depth before (in cm)" have significant differences between the two groups (p<0.05).

Therefore, the study assessed that there is a significant difference between the two groups for most of the parameters assessed, except for "Finger Measurements Vertical (Before)" and "Inch measurements before treatment (above the umbilicus)."

 

Table 3: Significance Test findings of each parameter assessed between the two groups

 

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F-value

p-value

Finger Measurements Vertical (Before)

Between Groups

0.03

1

0.03

0.01

0.921

Within Groups

286.16

78

3.66

 

 

Total

286.20

79

 

 

 

Finger Measurements Vertical (After)

Between Groups

70.40

1

70.40

97.05

<.001

Within Groups

56.58

78

0.72

 

 

Total

126.98

79

 

 

 

Inch measurements before treatment (at umbilicus)

Between Groups

67.32

1

67.32

6.19

0.01

Within Groups

869.93

80

10.87

 

 

Total

937.26

81

 

 

 

Inch measurements before treatment (above the umbilicus)

Between Groups

10.90

1

10.90

0.90

0.34

Within Groups

968.28

80

12.10

 

 

Total

979.18

81

 

 

 

Inch measurements before treatment (below the umbilicus)

Between Groups

125.14

1

125.14

10.74

0.002

Within Groups

931.48

80

11.64

 

 

Total

1056.62

81

 

 

 

Inch measurements after treatment (at umbilicus)

Between Groups

285.17

1

285.17

29.74

<.001

Within Groups

766.93

80

9.58

 

 

Total

1052.11

81

 

 

 

Inch measurements after treatment (above the umbilicus)

Between Groups

108.44

1

108.44

11.55

0.001

Within Groups

750.60

80

9.38

 

 

Total

859.05

81

 

 

 

Inch measurements after treatment (below the umbilicus)

Between Groups

407.86

1

407.86

38.36

<.001

Within Groups

850.50

80

10.63

 

 

Total

1258.37

81

 

 

 

Days of treatment

Between Groups

772.63

1

772.63

69.23

<.001

Within Groups

881.58

79

11.15

 

 

Total

1654.22

80

 

 

 

Depth before (cm)

Between Groups

60.26

1

60.26

14.46

<.001

Within Groups

333.41

80

4.16

 

 

Total

393.68

81

 

 

<.001

Depth after (cm)

Between Groups

398.42

1

398.42

228.62

 

Within Groups

139.41

80

1.74

 

 

Total

537.83

81

 

 

 

 

DISCUSSION- One of the frequent problems experienced by post-partum women is DRA. DRA can be challenging to treat. Due to the past lack of knowledge about this condition, many patients could not receive prompt and efficient diagnosis and treatment, which caused the parturients' DRA symptoms to worsen continuously and impacted their quality of life [37-40]. The occurrence and progressive aggravation of complications and the requirement for surgical treatment can be prevented by early diagnosis and detection of DRA. In China, medical clinics are frequently the initial contact points for diagnosing and caring for DRA in post-partum women.

Because of its early symptoms' mildness, maternal post-partum DRA received less attention in the past. Yet, as more research and studies have been conducted, more excellent knowledge of DRA has emerged. One of the frequent issues during pregnancy and the post-partum period is DRA [37,38]. It may start around week 14 of pregnancy and worsen during the next few weeks until birth. Although the illness has grown apparent, there is still debate on DRA diagnosis and course of action [39,40]. Long-term post-partum DRA may result in health issues, such as enduring low back pain and abdominal and pelvic discomfort. This has been clearly shown in prior investigations. In the first six months after giving birth, 40% of women statistically report having ongoing pelvic and lower back pain [31,32]. DRA is not a health issue that can be resolved for many post-partum women and may worsen over time. The symptoms of DRA and whether they may be treated directly or indirectly determine whether to intervene or provide treatment. According to the study's findings, the DRA separation was greatly enhanced and mended above the umbilicus' centre and below its 4.5 cm border, not just partially recovered.

The key to treating DRA separation early on and normalizing it is relieving patient symptoms. Another efficient option to treat DRA is by non-surgical treatment and early active intervention techniques [29]. At the same time, corsets, acupuncture treatment, pelvic floor muscle exercise, posture and back care, frequent abdominal workouts, and other non-surgical procedures have all been suggested as effective non-surgical interventions for DRA treatment.

Exercise can significantly reduce DRA symptoms and is a successful non-surgical treatment, according to a prior study that showed the effectiveness of abdominal exercises with bracing in lowering DRA in the early post-partum period. This suggests that workouts may be pretty useful in the early post-natal period, suggesting a non-surgical treatment option for DRA [33].

For a resistant and bulging abdominal wall, static abdominal contractions, pelvic rocking, sit-ups, and leg slides are also advised [39]. According to some reports, the ribs, linea alba, and thoracolumbar fascia can all be stabilized by bilateral activation of the transversus abdominis. The gap at the linea alba is closed by contracting the transversus abdominis, shortening the rectus abdominis muscles. Also, it has been demonstrated that therapeutic activities effectively treat several particular disorders in women. According to a recent study, closed kinetic chain workouts in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis significantly improved bone mineral density and decreased fall risk. Based on this information, therapeutic exercises, such as ones that enhance core stability, may be helpful for DRA patients [40].

 

CONCLUSIONS- The study has concluded that KIASTM significantly reduces the diastasis recti and achieves other desirable outcomes. The variables measured in this study showed KIASTM, if applied with massage and exercise, can bring significant positive results within less time. The study, however, is single-centred, and findings cannot be considered conclusive. The author suggests conducting similar studies in other settings and centres to bring out the findings from varied populations. Overall, this study has highlighted an essential point of physiotherapy dealing with diastasis recti patients, which is quite common in lactating mothers.

The study further highlighted that the group receiving KIASTM needed fewer days to achieve the desired goal.

 

CONTRIBUTION OF AUTHORS

One author is only contributed to this article.

 

REFERENCES

1.     Chiarello CM, Falzone LA, McCaslin KE, Patel MN, et al. The effects of an exercise program on diastasis recti abdominis in pregnant women. J Womens Health Phys Therap., 2005; 29(1): 11-16.

2.     Gruszczyńska D, Dąbek A, Rekowski W. Diastasis recti abdominis-what may cause it in postpartum women?. Postepy Rehabilitacji, 2021; 35(2): 24.

3.     Alamer A, Kahsay G, Ravichandran H. Prevalence of diastasis recti and associated factors among women attending antenatal and postnatal careatmekelle city health facilities, tigray, Ethiopia. Age, 2019; 20, pp.37.

4.    Manik RK, Dubey S, Joshi A. The Effect of Possible Yogic Practices in Management of Pregnancy Induced Hypertension. J Surv Fish Sci., 2023; 10(1S): 4237-46.

5.     Rett MT, Almeida TV. Factors relating to mother and child associated with separation of the rectus abdominis muscle in immediate puerperium. Rev Bras Sa de Matern Infant Recif., 2014; 14(1): 73-80.

6.     Rett MT, Braga MD, Bernardes NO, Andrade SC. Prevalence of diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles immediately post-partum: comparison between primiparae and multiparae. Rev Bras Fisioter., 2009; 13(4): 275-80.

7.     Hafeez S, Baig TI, Ali M, Hafeez H, et al. Prevalence of Diastasis Recti Abdominis in Females with Respect to Their Stage and Status of Pregnancy. Pak J Med Health Sci., 2022; 16(05): 1498-98.

8.     Benjamin DR, van de Water AT, Peiris CL. Effects of exercise on diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscle in the antenatal and postnatal periods: a systematic review. Physiotherapy., 2014; 100(1): 1-8.

9.     Yuan S, Li Y, Li Q, Fan L, Zhou J. Surgery versus non-surgery interventions on rectus abdominis diastasis with or without hernias: a systematic review. Ind J Surg., 2021; pp: 1-14.

10.  Candido G, Lo T, Janssen P. Risk factors for diastasis of the recti abdominis. J Assoc Chart Physiother Womens Health, 2005; 97(2): 49-54.

11.  Korra MC, Korra MD. Puerperio. Obstetrics Obstetric Practice, 12a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Medici; 1999; 65(4): 1-12.

12.  Lopes LC, Lopes RUI. Application of point of care ultrasound and relevance of anatomy in necrotizing fasciitis. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Pl stica, 2022; 37: 76-79.

13.  Thabet AA, Alshehri MA. Efficacy of deep core stability exercise program in post-partum women with diastasis recti abdominis: a randomised controlled trial. J Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions, 2019; 19(1): 62.

14.  Stephenson RG, O'connor LJ. Obstetric and gynecologic care in physical therapy, 2nd Ed. New York: Slack incorporated press., 2000; 24(7): 1-10.

15.  Mesquita LA, Machado AV, Andrade AV. Fisioterapia para redu o da di stase dos m sculos retos abdominais no p s-parto. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet., 1999; 42(6): 11-20.

16.  Mota P, Pascoal AG, Sancho F, Bo K. Test-retest and intrarater reliability of 2-dimensional ultrasound measurements of distance between rectus abdominis in women. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther., 2012; 42(11): 940-46.

17.  Tupler J, Gould J. Lose your mummy tummy. Cambridge: Da Capo Press, 2005; 40(4): 21-34.

18.  Lee DG, Lee LJ, McLaughlin L. Stability, continence and breathing: the role of fascia following pregnancy and delivery. J Bodywork Move Ther., 2008; 12(4): 333-48.

19.  Spitznagle TM, Leong FC, Van Dillen LR Prevalence of diastasis recti abdominis in a urogynecological patient population. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct., 2007; 18(3): 321-28.

20.  Acharry N, Kutty RK. Abdominal exercise with bracing, a therapeutic efficacy in reducing diastasis-recti among postpartal females. Int J Physiother Res., 2015; 3(2): 999-1005.

21.  Aguirre DA, Santosa AC, Casola G, Sirlin CB. Abdominal wall hernias: imaging features, complication, and diagnostic pitfalls at multi-detector row CT. Radiographics., 2005; 25(6): 1501-20.

22.  Caldeira A, Lott M, Duran C, Holgu n JC. Other trends in abdominoplasty: new design and importance of lipo-mid-abdominoplasty in body contour surgery. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Pl stica, 2023; 35: 60-71.

23.  Parker M, Millar L, Dugan S. Diastasis rectus abdominis and lumbo-pelvic pain and dysfunction - Are they related? J Womens Health Phys Therap., 2009; 33(2): 15-22.

24.  Hall H, Sanjaghsaz H. Diastasis Recti Rehabilitation. 2021; In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan. 2023 Aug 8. available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34424636/.

25.  Opala-Berdzik A, Dabrowski S. Physiotherapy in diastasis of the rectus muscles of abdomen in women during pregnancy and post-partum. Fizjoterapia, 2009; 17(4): 67-70.

26.  Keeler J, Albrecht M, Eberhardt L, Horn L, Donnelly C, et al. Diastasis recti abdominis: a survey of women's health specialists for current physical therapy clinical practice for post-partum women. J Womens Health Phys Therap., 2012; 36(3): 131-42.

27.  Jessen ML, berg S, Rosenberg J. Treatment options for abdominal rectus diastasis. Front surg., 2019; 6: 65.

28.  Snijders T, Verdijk LB, Beelen M, McKay BR, Parise G, et al. A single bout of exercise activates skeletal muscle satellite cells during subsequent overnight recovery. Exp Physiol., 2012; 97(6): 762-73.

29.  Walton L, Costa A, LaVanture D, McIlrath S, Stebbins B. The effects of a 6 week dynamic core stability plank exercise program compared to a traditional supine core stability strengthening program on diastasis recti abdominis closure, pain, oswestry disability index (ODI) and pelvic floor disability index scores (PFDI). Phy Ther Rehab., 2016; 3(1): 3-8.

30.  Rathi M. Effect of pelvic floor muscle strengthening exercises in chronic low back pain. IJPOT, 2013; 7(1): 121-25.

31.  El-Mekawy H, Eldeeb A, El- Lythy M, El-Begawy A. Effect of Abdominal Exercises versus Abdominal Supporting Belt on Post-Partum Abdominal Efficiency and Rectus Separation. Int J Med Health Sci., 2013; 7(1): 75-79.

32.  Litos K. Progressive Therapeutic Exercise Program for Successful Treatment of a Post-partum Woman With a Severe Diastasis Recti Abdominis. J Womens Health Phys Therap., 2014; 38(2): 58-73.

33.  Okike K, Phillips DP, Swart E, O Connor MI. Orthopaedic faculty and resident sex diversity are associated with the orthopaedic residency application rate of female medical students. JBJS, 2019; 101(12): e56.

34.  Hammer WI. The effect of mechanical load on degenerated soft tissue. J Bodyw Mov Ther., 2008; 12(3): 246 56.

35.  Keshwani N, Mathur S, McLean L. The impact of exercise therapy and abdominal binding in the management of diastasis recti abdominis in the early post-partum period: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Physiother Theory Pract., 2021; 37(9): 1018-33.

36.  Malcher F, Lima DL, Lima R, et al. Endoscopic onlay repair for ventral hernia and rectus abdominis diastasis repair: why so many different names for the same procedure? A qualitative systematic review. Surg Endosc., 2021; 35(10): 5414-21.

37.  Sperstad JB, Tennfjord MK, Hilde G, et al. Diastasis recti abdominis during pregnancy and 12 months after childbirth: prevalence, risk factors and report of lumbopelvic pain. Br J Sports Med., 2016; 50(17): 1092-96.

38.  van de Water AT, Benjamin DR. Measurement methods to assess diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscle (DRAM): a systematic review of their measurement properties and meta-analytic reliability generalization. Man Ther., 2016; 21(4): 41-53.

39.  Parker MA, Millar LA, Dugan SA. Diastasis rectus abdominis and lumbo-pelvic pain and dysfunction-Are they related?. J Women's Health Phy Ther., 2009; 33(2): 15-22.

40.  Carlstedt A, Bringman S, Egberth M, Emanuelsson P, Olsson A, et al. Management of diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles: recommendations for Swedish national guidelines. Scandinavian J Surg., 2021; 110(3): 452-59. doi: 10.1177/1457496920961000.